March 2001
·
84 Reads
·
71 Citations
Journal of Political Philosophy
What is this page?
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
Publications (2)
March 2001
·
28 Reads
·
7 Citations
The Journal of Value Inquiry
Au-dela du debat opposant M. Walzer et J. Rawls sur la question des principes de la justice, l'A. montre qu'une conception de la raison publique internationale et de la justice minimale doit rejeter une approche sociale de la justice au profit d'un pluralisme raisonnable.
Citations (2)
... See Quong (2011, p. 141). To be sure, consider the controversy around tolerating the unreasonable (Friedman, 2000;Kelly & McPherson, 2001;Quong, 2011). Unreasonable persons reject one or more fundamental elements of a political conception of justice. ...
Reference:
El rawlsianismo y lo que urge
- Citing Article
March 2001
Journal of Political Philosophy
... While Walzer's argument is useful in identifying that ideas about what constitutes a 'good' society are culturally contingent, his views have been seen as legitimising too much separation between spheres of justice and failing to suggest any minimum cross-cultural standards. Kelly (2001: 76), for example, has argued that Walzer's conception of spheres runs the risk of presenting cultures as static, homogenous and mutually exclusive. In the context of this paper, the crucial point is that a conceptualisation of society as a set of separate and self-determining spheres, each with its own principles of justice and formulation of rights, leaves little possibility for any notion of social inclusion across cultural difference. ...
- Citing Article
March 2001
The Journal of Value Inquiry