May 2017
·
72 Reads
·
4 Citations
Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
Objectives This study of directiveness draws on the literature on patient-therapist matching, neutrality, and resistance. Our aim was to investigate how psychotherapists conceptualize directiveness as an attitude, with a focus on pantheoretical aspects of directiveness. Design and methodsOur data are narratives from 18 interviews with psychotherapists of different theoretical orientations (cognitive-behavioural, family-systems, humanistic-experiential, and psychodynamic), and from focus-group discussions with six other psychotherapists. ResultsThe analysis yielded four general themes: expression of directiveness (behaviour, agency, structure), its presence (depending on phase of and goals for therapy), its positive and negative outcomes (for patients and therapists, respectively), and therapist awareness (initial and shifting, depending on theoretical orientation). Conclusions Directiveness may be construed as an attitude. It supposedly increases via certain responses, but only a few of these are considered positive by therapists at large. Directiveness may be more present in early and late phases of therapy, and more warranted with patients that function poorly. There are both positive and negative outcomes of directiveness, but therapists are more prone to disclose the former.