Emily Yang’s research while affiliated with University of California, Los Angeles and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (5)


Alphavirus replication shows differential sensitivity to endogenous ZAP in 293T cells. (A,C) ZAP KO and WT 293T cells untreated (A) or treated with 5 U/mL IFN-β for 24 h (C) were infected with GFP-expressing RRV, SINV, ONNV, or CHIKV vaccine strain 181/clone 25 (MOI = 1 PFU/cell). Cells were harvested and fixed at 24 h post-infection (h.p.i.), and their percentage of infection was determined by flow cytometry. Data are combined from three independent experiments performed with biological replicates in triplicate wells. Error bars represent the standard deviations (SD). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (unpaired T test with Holm–Šídák’s multiple comparisons test: ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001). (B,D) Fold inhibition of alphavirus replication by ZAP. Data from panels A (B) or C (D) are represented. Fold inhibition relative to ZAP KO was calculated by dividing the percentage of infection of each virus in ZAP KO 293T cells by the percentage of infection in WT 293T cells. Error bars represent the standard deviations (SD). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).
Alphavirus production shows differential sensitivity to IFN-induced endogenous ZAP in 293T cells. Following treatment with 5 U/mL IFN-β for 24 h, ZAP KO and WT 293T were infected with RRV (A), SINV (B), ONNV (C), and the CHIKV vaccine strain (181/clone 25) (D) at MOI = 0.1 PFU/cell. Media overlaying the cells were harvested at 0, 8, 24, and 48 h.p.i., and the viral titer was determined by infection of BHK-21 cells in standard plaque assays. Mean values from four biological replicates across two independent experiments are plotted, and error bars represent the SD. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni posttest: **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).
ZAPS and ZAPL binding to alphavirus genomic RNA do not correlate with alphavirus replication sensitivity to ZAP. (A,C) Lysates of ZAP KO 293T cells with induced expression of RFP-ZAPS (A) or RFP-ZAPL (C) were incubated with biotinylated Fluc RNA or gRNA of RRV, SINV, ONNV, or CHIKV. Following streptavidin-mediated pull-down of biotinylated RNA, ZAP associated with each RNA and in whole cell lysate (input) was assayed by immunoblot (IB). Expected sizes: RFP-ZAPS = 106 kDa, RFP-ZAPL = 130 kDa. Data are representative of results from three independent experiments. (B,D) ImageJ quantifications of panel A (B) or C (D). Data are combined from three independent experiments. Error bars represent the SD. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ****, p < 0.0001).
The alphavirus nsP gene region contains the ZAP sensitivity determinant. (A) Schematics of chimeric viruses generated. The GFP construct is the same across all viruses. (B) ZAP KO 293T cells with doxycycline-inducible expression of ZAPS or ZAPL were infected with GFP-expressing SINV, ONNV, or ONNV nsP/SINV sP chimeric virus at MOI = 0.1 PFU/cell for 18 h before their percentage of infection was determined by flow cytometry. Fold inhibition by ZAP relative to doxycycline-untreated (-dox) cells is shown here. Error bars represent the SD. Data representative of two independent experiments performed with biological replicates in triplicate wells. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: **, p < 0.01; ****, p < 0.0001). ns—not significant.
ZAPS and ZAPL binding to alphavirus nsP RNA do not correlate with alphavirus replication sensitivity to ZAP. (A,C) Lysates of ZAP KO 293T cells with induced expression of RFP-ZAPS (A) or RFP-ZAPL (C) were incubated with biotinylated Fluc RNA or nsP RNA of RRV, SINV, ONNV, or CHIKV. Following streptavidin-mediated pull-down of biotinylated RNA, ZAP associated with each RNA and in whole cell lysate (input) was assayed by immunoblot. Expected sizes: RFP-ZAPS = 106 kDa, RFP-ZAPL = 130 kDa. Data are representative of results from three independent experiments. (B,D) ImageJ quantifications of panel A (B) or C (D). Data are combined from three independent experiments. Error bars represent the SD. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01).

+3

Alphavirus Evasion of Zinc Finger Antiviral Protein (ZAP) Correlates with CpG Suppression in a Specific Viral nsP2 Gene Sequence
  • Article
  • Full-text available

March 2023

·

69 Reads

·

12 Citations

·

Kelly S. Aldana

·

Emily Yang

·

[...]

·

Certain re-emerging alphaviruses, such as chikungunya virus (CHIKV), cause serious disease and widespread epidemics. To develop virus-specific therapies, it is critical to understand the determinants of alphavirus pathogenesis and virulence. One major determinant is viral evasion of the host interferon response, which upregulates antiviral effectors, including zinc finger antiviral protein (ZAP). Here, we demonstrated that Old World alphaviruses show differential sensitivity to endogenous ZAP in 293T cells: Ross River virus (RRV) and Sindbis virus (SINV) are more sensitive to ZAP than o’nyong’nyong virus (ONNV) and CHIKV. We hypothesized that the more ZAP-resistant alphaviruses evade ZAP binding to their RNA. However, we did not find a correlation between ZAP sensitivity and binding to alphavirus genomic RNA. Using a chimeric virus, we found the ZAP sensitivity determinant lies mainly within the alphavirus non-structural protein (nsP) gene region. Surprisingly, we also did not find a correlation between alphavirus ZAP sensitivity and binding to nsP RNA, suggesting ZAP targeting of specific regions in the nsP RNA. Since ZAP can preferentially bind CpG dinucleotides in viral RNA, we identified three 500-bp sequences in the nsP region where CpG content correlates with ZAP sensitivity. Interestingly, ZAP binding to one of these sequences in the nsP2 gene correlated to sensitivity, and we confirmed that this binding is CpG-dependent. Our results demonstrate a potential strategy of alphavirus virulence by localized CpG suppression to evade ZAP recognition.

Download

Elucidation of TRIM25 ubiquitination targets involved in diverse cellular and antiviral processes

September 2022

·

112 Reads

·

24 Citations

The tripartite motif (TRIM) family of E3 ubiquitin ligases is well known for its roles in antiviral restriction and innate immunity regulation, in addition to many other cellular pathways. In particular, TRIM25-mediated ubiquitination affects both carcinogenesis and antiviral response. While individual substrates have been identified for TRIM25, it remains unclear how it regulates diverse processes. Here we characterized a mutation, R54P, critical for TRIM25 catalytic activity, which we successfully utilized to “trap” substrates. We demonstrated that TRIM25 targets proteins implicated in stress granule formation (G3BP1/2), nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (UPF1), nucleoside synthesis (NME1), and mRNA translation and stability (PABPC4). The R54P mutation abolishes TRIM25 inhibition of alphaviruses independently of the host interferon response, suggesting that this antiviral effect is a direct consequence of ubiquitination. Consistent with that, we observed diminished antiviral activity upon knockdown of several TRIM25-R54P specific interactors including NME1 and PABPC4. Our findings highlight that multiple substrates mediate the cellular and antiviral activities of TRIM25, illustrating the multi-faceted role of this ubiquitination network in modulating diverse biological processes.


The Role of ZAP and TRIM25 RNA Binding in Restricting Viral Translation

June 2022

·

154 Reads

·

19 Citations

The innate immune response controls the acute phase of virus infections; critical to this response is the induction of type I interferon (IFN) and resultant IFN-stimulated genes to establish an antiviral environment. One such gene, zinc finger antiviral protein (ZAP), is a potent antiviral factor that inhibits replication of diverse RNA and DNA viruses by binding preferentially to CpG-rich viral RNA. ZAP restricts alphaviruses and the flavivirus Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) by inhibiting translation of their positive-sense RNA genomes. While ZAP residues important for RNA binding and CpG specificity have been identified by recent structural studies, their role in viral translation inhibition has yet to be characterized. Additionally, the ubiquitin E3 ligase tripartite motif-containing protein 25 (TRIM25) has recently been uncovered as a critical co-factor for ZAP’s suppression of alphavirus translation. While TRIM25 RNA binding is required for efficient TRIM25 ligase activity, its importance in the context of ZAP translation inhibition remains unclear. Here, we characterized the effects of ZAP and TRIM25 RNA binding on translation inhibition in the context of the prototype alphavirus Sindbis virus (SINV) and JEV. To do so, we generated a series of ZAP and TRIM25 RNA binding mutants, characterized loss of their binding to SINV genomic RNA, and assessed their ability to interact with each other and to suppress SINV replication, SINV translation, and JEV translation. We found that mutations compromising general RNA binding of ZAP and TRIM25 impact their ability to restrict SINV replication, but mutations specifically targeting ZAP CpG-mediated RNA binding have a greater effect on SINV and JEV translation inhibition. Interestingly, ZAP-TRIM25 interaction is a critical determinant of JEV translation inhibition. Taken together, these findings illuminate the contribution of RNA binding and co-factor interaction to the synergistic inhibition of viral translation by ZAP and TRIM25.


Figure 2. TRIM25 co-IP/MS Identifies TRIM25 interactors. (A) Western blot of TRIM25 inducible 293T cell 85 lines in the presence of increasing amount of dox (0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 10 μg/mL). Data are representative 86 of two independent experiments. (B) Schematic of co-IP/MS experiment to identify TRIM25 interactors. (C-D) 87 Volcano plots of proteins significantly enriched over TRIM25 KO background in TRIM25-R54P co-IP/MS in the 88 (C) absence or (D) presence of viral infection. Data representative of two independent experiments. Blue dots 89 represent proteins that were also significantly enriched in TRIM25-WT co-IP and red dots represent proteins that 90 were only enriched in TRIM25-R54P co-IP. Proteins were counted as enriched when log2FC>1.5 and -91 log10Pvalue>1.3 (Pvalue<0.05). The R package EnhancedVolcano 83 was used to generate volcano plots. (E) 92 Gene ontology terms significantly enriched in all unique TRIM25-WT and TRIM25-R54P interactors. Analysis 93 performed for GO terms in biological processes using DAVID. 31,32 94
Figure 4. TRIM25 interacts with and mono-ubiquitinates UPF1. (A) Western blot of TRIM25 inducible cells 02 transfected with V5-tagged UPF1 in the presence or absence of 1 μg/mL dox. Lysates were subjected to FLAG 03 IP. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (B-C) Western blot of TRIM25 inducible cells 04 transfected with (B) V5-UPF1 or (C) V5-UPF1 mutants (K281R, K592R) and HA-Ub in the presence of 1 μg/mL 05 dox. Lysates were subjected to V5 IP. Data are representative of three independent experiments. 06
Substrate trapping approach identifies TRIM25 ubiquitination targets involved in diverse cellular and antiviral processes

March 2022

·

74 Reads

·

3 Citations

The tripartite motif (TRIM) family of E3 ubiquitin ligases is well known for its roles in antiviral restriction and innate immunity regulation, in addition to many other cellular pathways. In particular, TRIM25-mediated ubiquitination affects both carcinogenesis and antiviral response. While individual substrates have been identified for TRIM25, it remains unclear how it regulates diverse processes. Here we characterized a mutation, R54P, critical for TRIM25 catalytic activity, which we successfully utilized to "trap" substrates. We demonstrated that TRIM25 targets proteins implicated in stress granule formation (G3BP1/2), nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (UPF1), and nucleoside synthesis (NME1). R54P abolishes TRIM25 inhibition of alphaviruses independently of the host interferon response, suggesting that this antiviral effect is a direct consequence of ubiquitination. Consistent with that, we observed diminished antiviral activity upon knockdown of several TRIM25-R54P specific interactors including NME1. Our findings highlight that multiple substrates mediate the cellular and antiviral activities of TRIM25, illustrating the multi-faceted role of this ubiquitination network in diverse biological processes.


All About the RNA: Interferon-Stimulated Genes That Interfere With Viral RNA Processes

December 2020

·

310 Reads

·

123 Citations

Interferon (IFN) signaling induces the expression of a wide array of genes, collectively referred to as IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) that generally function to inhibit viral replication. RNA viruses are frequently targeted by ISGs through recognition of viral replicative intermediates and molecular features associated with viral genomes, or the lack of molecular features associated with host mRNAs. The ISGs reviewed here primarily inhibit viral replication in an RNA-centric manner, working to sense, degrade, or repress expression of viral RNA. This review focuses on dissecting how these ISGs exhibit multiple antiviral mechanisms, often through use of varied co-factors, highlighting the complexity of the type I IFN response. Specifically, these ISGs can mediate antiviral effects through viral RNA degradation, viral translation inhibition, or both. While the OAS/RNase L pathway globally degrades RNA and arrests translation, ISG20 and ZAP employ targeted RNA degradation and translation inhibition to block viral replication. Meanwhile, SHFL targets translation by inhibiting -1 ribosomal frameshifting, which is required by many RNA viruses. Finally, a number of E3 ligases inhibit viral transcription, an attractive antiviral target during the lifecycle of negative-sense RNA viruses which must transcribe their genome prior to translation. Through this review, we aim to provide an updated perspective on how these ISGs work together to form a complex network of antiviral arsenals targeting viral RNA processes.

Citations (4)


... It also interacts with various cellular proteins that may act as cofactors, enhancing its antiviral effects [29]. Furthermore, ZAP can augment other antiviral systems [30,31]. Recent studies, including our own, have demonstrated that flaviviruses such as Zika virus, JEV, and WNV are susceptible to ZAP antiviral effects in VERO cells [30,32,33]. ...

Reference:

Infectious Subgenomic Amplicon Strategies for Japanese Encephalitis and West Nile Viruses
Alphavirus Evasion of Zinc Finger Antiviral Protein (ZAP) Correlates with CpG Suppression in a Specific Viral nsP2 Gene Sequence

... 11,12 The discovery of new ligands for E3 ligases, particularly those with non-degradative ubiquitination activity, presents a promising strategy to activate alternative cellular outcomes for disease-related proteins. 13 We sought to assess whether the E3 ligase TRIM25, reported to catalyse the formation of both Lys48-and Lys63-linked ubiquitin chains, 14 could be liganded and repurposed for targeted protein ubiquitination. TRIM25 is a member of the TRIM family of RING-type E3 ligases and comprises a canonical Nterminal tripartite motif (TRIM) and a variable C-terminal PRYSPRY substrate binding domain (Fig. 1A). ...

Elucidation of TRIM25 ubiquitination targets involved in diverse cellular and antiviral processes

... 15 As the majority of current proximity-inducing small molecules for E3s recruit substrates to the physiological substrate binding component (e.g. the substrate adaptor of Cullin RING E3s), 11 we focused our efforts towards liganding the PRYSPRY substrate binding domain of TRIM25. TRIM25 has been reported to ubiquitinate a number of different substrates, possibly in some cases mediated through RNA binding, 16 including RIG-I, 15,17,18 DDX3X 19 and ZAP, [20][21][22] with diverse roles in immune regulation, cancer signalling pathways and antiviral activity. [23][24][25][26] As such, TRIM25 is a promising candidate for redirection to a variety of neosubstrates, and the development of novel chemical tools Fig. S1A, ESI; † (E) k obs (h −1 ) plotted against concentration (mM), fitted using a straight line fit. ...

The Role of ZAP and TRIM25 RNA Binding in Restricting Viral Translation

... Upon closer inspection of the genes included in the innate immunity cluster, we recognized that most of these genes were downregulated in hnRNP A1-expressing cells compared to the parental CB3 cells and the hnRNP A1Bexpressing CB3 cells (Fig. 3C). Since many of the genes are considered as interferon stimulated genes 28 , we confirmed that this observation was not due to a differential expression of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), including TLR3 which is responsible for viral dsRNA recognition 29 (data not shown). Given these results, we proposed that in basal conditions, hnRNP A1, but not hnRNP A1B, represses the expression of genes that contribute to innate immunity and, more precisely, to the dsRNA response. ...

All About the RNA: Interferon-Stimulated Genes That Interfere With Viral RNA Processes