Emily K Mallaber's research while affiliated with Boston University and other places
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publication (1)
Songbirds provide a powerful model system for studying sensory-motor learning. However, many analyses of birdsong require time-consuming, manual annotation of its elements, called syllables. Automated methods for annotation have been proposed, but these methods assume that audio can be cleanly segmented into syllables, or they require carefully tun...
Citations
... 48 Researchers have used PAFs to cluster vocalisations of zebra finches (Taeniopygia 49 guttata) [18], baboons (Papio ursinus) [19], bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops 50 truncatus) [20], gibbons (Hylobates funereus) [21], and mice (Mus musculus) [22,23]. 51 For instance, Elie et al. [18] used 22 PAFs extracted using the Biosound package [24] to 52 cluster zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) vocalisations, Sainburg et al. [25] used 18 53 features from the same package to visualise and cluster vocalisations from 20 species, 54 Clink and Klinck [21] used Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) to cluster 55 gibbon (Hylobates funereus) calls by individual, and Van Segbroeck et al. [22] used a 56 gammatone filterbank to cluster mice (Mus musculus) vocalisations. Alternatively, to 57 capture spectro-temporal variations, the concatenation of consecutive spectrogram 58 frames can be used [25,26]. ...
