Emanuel Meier’s research while affiliated with ETH Zurich and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Figure 1. (Left) The routes used in the two scenarios. Numbers indicate the location of objects and the order in which they had to be identified. The northern route corresponds to Scenario A (first turning left), the southern one to Scenario B (first turning right). (Right) An overview of the objects in the two scenarios.
Figure 2. (Left) The numpad keys and their mapping to the eight vibe boards. "5" was used to initiate the vibration following a wizard-of-oz approach. (Right) The tactile belt used as part of this study, visible are two vibe boards (bottom), the power supply/battery (top left), and the microcontroller (top right).
Figure 3. Experimental setup used in the study. The experimenter (left) monitors the participant's performance and triggers vibrotactile cues to guide him to the next target along the route. The participant (right) controls a general aviation aircraft and tries to identify objects in the simulated environment while wearing eye tracking glasses and a tactile belt.
Figure 4. The study procedure the participants went through as part of the main study.
Figure 5. Set of sketch maps drawn by one of the participants after the flights. The identified objects are marked with crosses and numbered from 1 to 5.

+1

FlyBrate: Evaluating Vibrotactile Cues for Simulated Flight
  • Article
  • Full-text available

May 2022

·

78 Reads

·

6 Citations

·

·

Emanuel Meier

·

[...]

·

Contemporary aircraft cockpits rely mostly on audiovisual information propagation which can overwhelm particularly novice pilots. The introduction of tactile feedback, as a less taxed modality, can improve the usability in this case. As part of a within-subject simulator study, 22 participants are asked to fly a visual-flight-rule scenario along a predefined route and identify objects in the outside world that serve as waypoints. Participants fly two similar scenarios with and without a tactile belt that indicates the route. Results show that with the belt, participants perform better in identifying objects, have higher usability and user experience ratings, and a lower perceived cognitive workload, while showing no improvement in spatial awareness. Moreover, 86% of the participants state that they prefer flying with the tactile belt. These results suggest that a tactile belt provides pilots with an unobtrusive mode of assistance for tasks that require orientation using cues from the outside world.

Download

Citations (1)


... Unlike relying solely on visual and auditory feedback, this form of feedback significantly reduced individuals' cognitive load. An empirical study found that adding vibrotactile feedback in simulated flight training improved individuals' performance in flight tasks (Lutnyk et al., 2023). Tactile feedback, such as force and vibration, helps control virtual scenes and enhances device perception in remote operations (Giri et al., 2021). ...

Reference:

The Effect of Electroencephalogram Feedback in Virtual Reality Interactive System on Creativity Performance, Attention Value, and Cognitive Load
FlyBrate: Evaluating Vibrotactile Cues for Simulated Flight