Elliot B. Werner’s research while affiliated with Philadelphia University and other places

The first two visual field examinations of each of 16 glaucoma suspects and 16 glaucoma patients, who were followed up for a median of 7.46 years with seven examinations, were averaged. Three-dimensional color-coded images of the visual field were then generated. After correcting for test-retest variability, the images, as well as additional interpolated images, were aligned and presented in rapid succession to create an animation sequence. Five glaucoma specialists trained themselves to classify the visual fields as either progressing or not progressing. The interobserver and intraobserver agreement rates were then calculated. Perfect agreement (100% concordance) between the observers was obtained for 18 (56.3%) subjects, and at least 80% concordance was obtained for 27 (84.4%) subjects. Of the eight sequences that were repeated to test intraobserver agreement, four of the five observers had a value of at least 87.5%.

Computerized optic disc topographic measurements (cup-disc ratio, neuroretinal rim area, disc volume) and automated visual field parameters (total field loss, mean sensitivity) were similar in 48 eyes with primary open angle glaucoma and 27 eyes with low-tension glaucoma. In open angle glaucoma, the neuroretinal rim area was negatively correlated with the cup-disc ratio and the disc volume. Total field loss was positively correlated with the cup-disc ratio and the disc volume and negatively correlated with the neuroretinal rim area. Eyes with low-tension glaucoma showed a negative correlation between neuroretinal rim area and cup-disc ratio, and between total field loss and rim area. However, low-tension glaucomatous eyes did not have significant correlations between disc volume and rim area and between total field loss and cup-disc ratio or disc volume. Cupping in low-tension glaucoma was broadly sloping, resulting in less disc volume alteration.

The first four Octopus-automated visual field examinations of 29 patients with elevated intraocular pressure but apparently normal optic discs and Goldmann visual fields were studied for the presence of a learning effect on the visual field parameters of mean sensitivity, number of disturbed test locations, total field loss, and short-term fluctuation. A learning effect, if present, would manifest itself as an improvement in the visual field as patients become more experienced with the test. There was no apparent effect of patient experience on the mean sensitivity of the whole visual fields or the mean sensitivity of the test locations within 20 degrees of fixation. There was a significant (P = 0.012) increase in mean sensitivity for the test locations outside 20 degrees of fixation. There were significant (P less than 0.01) improvements in short-term fluctuation, total loss, and number of disturbed points between the first and second visual field examinations. The results indicated that there was a learning effect between the first and second automated visual field in glaucoma suspect patients who had previous experience with manual perimetry. It was not, however, very large in most patients and seems to be present in the peripheral portions of the visual field only. In most cases, it was not necessary to obtain more than two "baseline" examinations unless a patient demonstrated unusually high short-term fluctuation or had visual field defects inconsistent with the remainder of their clinical examination.

The total variability of the visual field was measured in 20 patients with open-angle glaucoma who appeared to be clinically stable and well controlled on medical therapy. All patients had at least four visual fields performed on the Octopus 201 perimeter with at least 12 months follow-up since their first visual field. The four most recently performed visual fields were analyzed. Two different methods for calculating total variability were used. One was based on the variance of the threshold determinations and the other was based on the range. The average total variability per subject was 2.8 decibels (db) using the variance-based calculation and 5.1 db using the range-based calculation. Ninety-five percent of the test locations had a variability of less than 6 db by the variance-based calculation method and 13 db by the range-based calculation method. We discuss the possibility of using this type of data to develop criteria for detection of progressive visual field loss in glaucoma.

We performed bilateral argon laser trabeculoplasty on 34 patients with medically uncontrolled open-angle glaucoma. Preoperative intraocular pressure was greater than 21 mm Hg, with a less than 3-mm Hg difference between the two eyes. Laser treatment (360 degrees) was performed on both eyes within a three-month interval. Mean (+/- S. D.) baseline intraocular pressure was similar in the first- (26.9 +/- 3.7 mm Hg) and second- (26.5 +/- 3.3 mm Hg) treated eyes. One hour after treatment, four first- and four second-treated eyes had a greater than 30% increase in intraocular pressure. The one-hour change in pressure was highly correlated between the two eyes (r = .794, P less than .0001). Intraocular pressure was reduced (P less than .0001) one, two, and three years after treatment in both the first and second-treated eyes. The percentages of first- and second-treated eyes with a pressure of less than or equal to 21 mm Hg were similar at one, two, and three years. Pressure response between the two eyes was correlated (P less than .0001) at year 1 (r = .815), 2 (r = .757), and 3 (r = .886) after laser therapy.

Variability of optic disk topographic measurements obtained with the Rodenstock Optic Nerve Head Analyzer was determined by obtaining three separate images on one eye of ten normal subjects and nine subjects without glaucoma. Marking of the disk margin was performed in a random and masked fashion on each image three times by three independent observers. The overall variabilities of the measurements of the subjects with glaucoma were not statistically different from those of the normal subjects. Overall variability was about 0.2 mm2 for total disk area, 0.08 for cup/disk ratio, 0.2 mm2 for disk rim area, and 0.07 mm3 for cup volume. The largest component of the variability was the result of acquisition of separate images of the optic disk at different times. Observer inconsistency in marking the disk edge was relatively small. Based on the expected amount of random variability of the measurements, we proposed criteria for detecting significant change in the optic disk over time.

The first four automated visual field examinations of 20 patients with clinically stable chronic open-angle glaucoma who had previously undergone manual perimetry were studied for the presence of a learning effect on mean sensitivity, number of disturbed test locations, total loss, and short-term fluctuation. A learning effect, if present, would manifest itself as an improvement in the visual field as patients become more experienced with the test. There was no apparent effect of patient experience on the mean sensitivity, total loss, or the number of disturbed test locations. There was a significant (P less than 0.0001) decrease in short-term fluctuation as measured by the root mean square between the first and second visual field examinations. These results indicate that a learning effect did not play an important role in the clinical interpretation of automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma who have previous experience with manual perimetry. In most cases, it was not necessary to obtain more than one "baseline" examination unless a patient demonstrated unusually high short-term fluctuation or had visual field defects inconsistent with the rest of the clinical examination.

The visual fields of 30 patients (subjects) with glaucoma were sent to six experienced clinicians (observers). Each subject had at least four visual field examinations on the OCTOPUS 201 automated perimeter spanning at least one year. Each observer was asked to review the visual field data of each subject and determine whether the visual fields were stable, improved, or worse over time. The visual field data were then analyzed using six different statistical models. In only 15 of the 30 subjects did at least five of the six human observers agree on the behavior of the visual field. Agreement among the statistical models was better, with at least five of the six models agreeing on 22 of the 30 subjects. It was concluded that there is, at present, no validated technique for detecting progressive visual field loss in glaucoma using automated perimetry when relatively few visual fields are available for analysis.

Nineteen patients undergoing argon laser trabeculoplasty for open-angle glaucoma were studied prospectively. All patients had glaucomatous visual field defects with inadequate medical control of intraocular pressure (IOP) before laser treatment. All patients had two automated visual fields immediately before laser treatment. They also had follow-up automated perimetry at 1, 4, 8, and 12 months posttreatment. The serial visual fields were compared using a one-way analysis of variance and trend analysis. After the laser trabeculoplasty, six patients showed visual field improvement, eight showed no change, and five showed progressive visual field deterioration. Patients with little fluctuation of IOP measurements after laser treatment had a better prognosis for visual field retention. The mean IOP level, however, was a poor predictor of visual field progression. Patients with more extensive visual field damage before laser treatment did not do worse than patients with less extensive visual field loss.