Ellen Snyder’s research while affiliated with Merck & Co. and other places

The orexin receptor antagonist suvorexant was previously reported to significantly improve total sleep time (TST), by 28 min per night versus placebo after 4 weeks, in a sleep laboratory polysomnography (PSG) study of patients with Alzheimer's disease and insomnia. The study included an exploratory evaluation of a consumer‐grade wearable “watch” device for assessing sleep that we report on here. Participants who met diagnostic criteria for both probable Alzheimer's disease dementia and insomnia were randomized to suvorexant 10–20 mg (N = 142) or placebo (N = 143) in a double‐blind, 4‐week trial. Patients were provided with a consumer‐grade wearable watch device (Garmin vívosmart® HR) to be worn continuously. Overnight sleep laboratory PSG was performed on three nights: screening, baseline and Night 29 (last dose). Watch treatment effects were assessed by change‐from‐baseline in watch TST at Week 4 (average TST per night). We also analysed Night 29 data only, with watch data restricted to the PSG recording time. In the 193 participants included in the Week 4 watch analysis (suvorexant = 97, placebo = 96), the suvorexant–placebo difference in watch TST was 4 min (p = .622). In patients with usable data for both assessments at the baseline and Night 29 PSG (suvorexant = 57, placebo = 50), the watch overestimated TST compared to PSG (e.g., placebo baseline = 412 min for watch and 265 min for PSG) and underestimated change‐from‐baseline treatment effects: the suvorexant–placebo difference was 20 min for watch TST (p = .405) and 35 min for PSG TST (p = .057). These findings show that the watch was less sensitive than PSG for evaluating treatment effects on TST.

Companies, managers, and individual contributors all have important roles in establishing and maintaining a culture of diversity and inclusion. This chapter discusses drivers of diverse workforces, bias, and ways statisticians in industry can show leadership and take action to build a strong culture of diversity and inclusion in their organizations.

We evaluated a single‐item Patient Global Impression‐Severity (PGI‐S) scale for assessing insomnia severity during the clinical development programme for suvorexant. The analyses used data from two randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, 3‐month, Phase III clinical trials of suvorexant in patients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV criteria insomnia. Patients assessed insomnia severity during the previous week using the PGI‐S, a one‐item questionnaire containing six response options ranging from 0 (none) to 5 (very severe), at baseline and at Week 2, and Months 1, 2, and 3 after randomisation. The seven‐item Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and other subjective and objective assessments were also completed by patients. PGI‐S responses were compared primarily with the ISI using descriptive statistics and correlations. The PGI‐S demonstrated favourable measurement characteristics (validity, reliability, responsiveness and sensitivity). PGI‐S scores decreased from baseline to Month 3 in a similar pattern to the ISI total score, and the Spearman correlation coefficient between PGI‐S and the ISI was .73. An improvement of ≥2 points on the PGI‐S defined a treatment responder, based on comparison to the ISI definition of a responder (improvement of ≥6 points). Our present findings suggest that the PGI‐S is a simple but valid, reliable, responsive, sensitive, and meaningful patient‐reported assessment of insomnia severity. The PGI‐S may be particularly useful as a companion outcome to sleep monitoring using wearable sleep devices or smartphones in at‐home settings.

Introduction Suvorexant, an orexin receptor antagonist, improved total sleep time (TST) in a sleep laboratory polysomnography (PSG) study of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and insomnia. The study included a pilot evaluation of an actigraphy watch for continuously recording patient’s sleep and daytime activity. We report on the utility of the watch for assessing sleep in relation to gold-standard PSG. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, 4-week trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02750306). Participants who met diagnostic criteria for both probable AD dementia and insomnia were randomized to suvorexant 10-20mg or placebo. Overnight sleep laboratory PSG was performed on 3 nights: screening, baseline, and Night-29 (last dose). An actigraphy watch (Garmin vívosmart® HR) was worn continuously by the patient. Separate analyses were performed for PSG and watch. We compared treatment effects on change-from-baseline in PSG-TST at Night-29 and WATCH-TST at Week-4 (average TST per night over Week-4). We also analyzed Night-29 data only with watch data restricted to the PSG recording time. Results A total of 274 participants were included in the Night-29 PSG analysis (suvorexant=135, placebo=139) and 223 in the Week-4 watch analysis (suvorexant=113, placebo=110). Suvorexant improved Night-29 PSG-TST by 28 minutes versus placebo (p=0.001) and Week-4 WATCH-TST by 17 minutes versus placebo (p=0.144). In the subgroup who had usable data for both assessments at Night-29 (suvorexant=57, placebo=50), the watch overestimated TST compared to PSG (e.g. placebo baseline scores = 412 minutes for WATCH-TST and 265 minutes for PSG-TST) and underestimated change-from-baseline treatment effects: the suvorexant versus placebo difference was 35 minutes for PSG-TST (p=0.057) and 20 minutes for WATCH-TST (p=0.405). Conclusion The watch was less sensitive than PSG for evaluating treatment effects on TST. However, results obtained with the watch were directionally similar to PSG in indicating a benefit of suvorexant versus placebo for improving TST in AD patients with insomnia. Support Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA

Introduction Suvorexant, an orexin receptor antagonist that enables sleep to occur via competitive antagonism of wake-promoting orexins, improved total sleep time (TST) in a sleep laboratory polysomnography (PSG) study of patients with AD and insomnia. Here we report on the effects of suvorexant on sleep architecture in the study. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, 4-week trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02750306). Participants who met diagnostic criteria for both probable AD dementia (of mild to moderate severity) and insomnia were randomized to suvorexant 10mg (could be increased to 20mg based on clinical response) or matching placebo. Overnight sleep laboratory PSG was performed on 3 nights: screening, baseline, and Night-29 (last night of dosing). Suvorexant differences from placebo in changes-from-baseline at Night-29 for sleep architecture were analyzed as exploratory endpoints. Results A total of 274 participants were included in the analysis (suvorexant N=135, placebo N=139). At Night-29, suvorexant improved TST by 28 minutes versus placebo (p=0.001). There were no significant differences between suvorexant and placebo in the % of TST spent in REM (1.3%, 95% CI: -0.5, 3.0), N1 (0.6%, 95% CI: -1.2, 2.5), N2 (-1.0%, 95% CI: -3.2, 1.2), or N3 (-0.6%, 95% CI: -1.8, 0.6). There was no significant difference between suvorexant and placebo in latency to REM (-5.4 minutes, 95% CI: -23.4, 12.7). Conclusion Suvorexant improves TST without altering the underlying sleep architecture in AD patients with insomnia. Support Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA

Introduction: We evaluated the clinical profile of the orexin receptor antagonist suvorexant for treating insomnia in patients with mild-to-moderate probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia. Methods: Randomized, double-blind, 4-week trial of suvorexant 10 mg (could be increased to 20 mg based on clinical response) or placebo in patients who met clinical diagnostic criteria for both probable AD dementia and insomnia. Sleep was assessed by overnight polysomnography in a sleep laboratory. The primary endpoint was change-from-baseline in polysomnography-derived total sleep time (TST) at week 4. Results: Of 285 participants randomized (suvorexant, N = 142; placebo, N = 143), 277 (97%) completed the trial (suvorexant, N = 136; placebo, N = 141). At week 4, the model-based least squares mean improvement-from-baseline in TST was 73 minutes for suvorexant and 45 minutes for placebo; (difference = 28 minutes [95% confidence interval 11-45], p < 0.01). Somnolence was reported in 4.2% of suvorexant-treated patients and 1.4% of placebo-treated patients. Discussion: Suvorexant improved TST in patients with probable AD dementia and insomnia.

Objective: The determinants of sleep quality (sQUAL) are poorly understood. We evaluated how well a large number of objective polysomnography (PSG) parameters can predict sQUAL in insomnia patients participating in trials of sleep medications or placebo. Methods: PSG recordings over multiple nights from two clinical drug development programs involving 1158 insomnia patients treated with suvorexant or placebo and 903 insomnia patients treated with gaboxadol or placebo were used post-hoc to analyze univariate and multivariate associations between sQUAL and 98 PSG sleep parameters plus patient's age and gender. Analyses were performed separately for each of the two clinical trial databases. For univariate associations, within-subject correlations were estimated using mixed effect modeling of bi-variate longitudinal data with one variable being a given PSG variable and the other being sQUAL. To evaluate how accurately sQUAL could be predicted by all PSG variables jointly plus patient's age and gender, the Random Forest multivariate technique was used. Random Forest was also used to evaluate the accuracy of sQUAL prediction by subjective sleep measures plus age and gender, and to quantitatively describe the relative importance of each variable for predicting sQUAL. Results: In the univariate analyses, total sleep time (TST) had the largest correlation with sQUAL compared with all other PSG sleep parameters, and the magnitude of the correlation between each PSG sleep architecture parameter and sQUAL generally increased with the strength of their associations with TST. In the multivariate analyses, the overall accuracy of sQUAL prediction, even with the large number of PSG parameters plus patient's age and gender, was moderate (area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AROC): 71.2-71.8%). Ranking of PSG parameters by their contribution to sQUAL indicated that TST was the most important predictor of sQUAL among all PSG variables. Subjective TST and subjective number of awakenings jointly with patient's age classified sQUAL with higher accuracy (AROC: 78.7-81.7%) than PSG variables plus age and gender. The pattern of findings was consistent across the two clinical trial databases. Conclusion: In insomnia patients participating in trials of sleep medications or placebo, PSG variables had a moderate but consistent pattern of association with sQUAL across two separate clinical trial databases. Of the PSG variables evaluated, TST was the best predictor of sQUAL. CLINICAL TRIALS: trial registration at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01097616; NCT01097629; NCT00094627; NCT00094666.

Background: Pembrolizumab is a potent, humanized, monoclonal anti-programmed death 1 antibody that has demonstrated effective antitumor activity and acceptable safety in multiple tumor types. Therapeutic biologics can result in the development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs), which may alter drug clearance and neutralize target binding, potentially reducing drug efficacy; such immunogenicity may also result in infusion reactions, anaphylaxis, and immune complex disorders. Pembrolizumab immunogenicity and its impact on exposure, safety, and efficacy was assessed in this study. Patients and methods: Pembrolizumab immunogenicity was assessed in 3655 patients with advanced or metastatic cancer treated in 12 clinical studies. Patients with melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, urothelial cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma were treated with pembrolizumab at 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 200 mg every 3 weeks. An additional study involving 496 patients with stage III melanoma treated with 200 mg adjuvant pembrolizumab every 3 weeks after complete resection was analyzed separately. Results: Of 3655 patients, 2000 were evaluable for immunogenicity analysis, 36 (1.8%) were treatment-emergent (TE) ADA-positive; 9 (0.5%) of these TE-positive patients had antibodies with neutralizing capacity. The presence of pembrolizumab-specific ADAs did not impact pembrolizumab exposure, nor did pembrolizumab immunogenicity affect the incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) or infusion-related reactions. There was no clear relationship between the presence of pembrolizumab-specific ADAs and changes in tumor size across treatment regimens. Of the 496 patients treated with pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy, 495 were evaluable, 17 (3.4%) were TE ADA-positive; none had neutralizing antibodies. Conclusions: The incidence of TE (neutralizing positive) ADAs against pembrolizumab was low in patients with advanced tumors. Furthermore, immunogenicity did not appear to have any clinically relevant effects on the exposure, safety, or efficacy of pembrolizumab. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01295827 (February 15, 2011), NCT01704287 (October 11, 2012), NCT01866319 (May 31, 2013), NCT01905657 (July 23, 2013), NCT02142738 (May 20, 2014), NCT01848834 (May 8, 2013), NCT02255097 (October 2, 2014), NCT02460198 (June 2, 2015), NCT01953692 (October 1, 2013), NCT02453594 (May 25, 2015), NCT02256436 (October 3, 2014), NCT02335424 (January 9, 2015), NCT02362594 (February 13, 2015).