Elizabeth M. Sieminski’s research while affiliated with Lincoln University - Pennsylvania and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Developing prospective elementary teachers’ abilities to identify evidence of student mathematical achievement
  • Article

February 2011

·

101 Reads

·

37 Citations

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

·

·

·

[...]

·

Elizabeth M. Sieminski

This study investigated the effects of a classroom intervention on prospective elementary teachers’ ability to evaluate evidence of student achievement of mathematical learning goals. The intervention was informed by a framework for teacher education which aims to provide prospective teachers (PTs) with the skills needed to systematically learn from their own teaching practice. Prospective teachers (N=160) participated in an intervention aimed at addressing their misconceptions about evidence of student learning. Results revealed that after the intervention, PTs were less likely to consider teacher behaviors to be evidence of student learning and more likely to discount student responses that were irrelevant to a specified learning goal. However, PTs were still likely to take procedural fluency as evidence of conceptual understanding and may have become overly skeptical of student understanding. Implications of the study suggest new ways of developing prospective teachers’ ability to systematically study and improve their teaching. KeywordsProspective teachers–Evaluating teaching–Analyzing teaching–Analyzing student work–Learning to teach–Teacher preparation

Citations (1)


... Morris et al. (2009) found that K-8 PTs focused primarily on students' explicit and visible actions instead of the concepts underlying those actions and that the correctness of students' responses also positively influenced PTs' analyses of students' mathematical understanding. In other words, PTs overestimated students' mathematical understanding when students correctly used procedures (e.g., the area formula) or gave correct answers; they deemed procedural understanding as evidence of conceptual understanding (Morris 2006;Spitzer et al. 2011). ...

Reference:

Finding the boundary of kindergarteners' subtraction understanding: prospective teachers' problem development and questioning
Developing prospective elementary teachers’ abilities to identify evidence of student mathematical achievement
  • Citing Article
  • February 2011

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education