Eleonora Nieddu’s research while affiliated with University of Padua and other places

Total hepatectomy and liver transplantation has emerged as a game-changing strategy in the treatment of several liver-confined primary or metastatic tumors, opening the new era of transplant oncology. However, the expansion of indications is going to worsen the chronic scarcity of organs, and new strategies are needed to enlarge the donor pool. A possible source of organs could be developing split liver transplantation (SLT) programs. We propose to refer donors aged 18-50 years unsuitable for pediatric patients and donors aged 50-60 years for split evaluation. This will generate new small left lateral grafts that can be used for RAPID procedures, based on a national waiting list specifically for non-HCC oncologic patients. Centralized imaging review will streamline the donor-recipient matching process and address organizational challenges. Additionally, adopting an ex-situ splitting technique during hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion could further enhance logistical efficiency and improve graft viability. The proposed protocol (ALERT 50) will therefore promote the development of oncologic indications without affecting the standard waiting list and without competing with urgent or pediatric patients.

Liver transplantation is emerging as a promising strategy to treat several malignancies, in selected patients. However, expanding the indication for LT to oncologic indication exacerbates the persisting shortage of grafts. Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) appears as a useful solution to enlarge the donor pool to meet this need. This review aims to comprehensively explore the current indications for LDLT in the context of hepatic malignancies, emphasizing reported outcomes and presenting future perspectives. A particular attention will be devoted to ethical considerations. The review will focus on the role of LDLT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), for intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA and pCCA), and for colo-rectal liver metastases (CRLM). Lastly, we will present new techniques of living transplantation using small left lateral grafts, namely RAPID Resection And Partial Liver segment II-III transplantation with Delayed total hepatectomy) and dual-graft transplantation (DG-LDLT).

Background Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare biliary tract tumor with poor prognosis that often is challenging to diagnose and the majority of patients present with advanced stage. Squamous cell carcinoma antigen 1 (SCCA1) overexpression has been found in different tumors associated with poor prognosis and chemoresistance. Aims To assess the presence and possible prognostic role of SCCA1/2 isoforms in bile and serum of patients with CCA. Methods Forty seven surgical patients (36 with CCA and 11 with benign diseases) were prospectively included in the study. Serum and bile specimens were collected at the time of surgery and free and IgM-complexed SCCA was quantified by ELISA (Xeptagen, srl). Results Free or IgM linked SCCA was rarely found in serum, while SCCA was detectable in bile samples of patients with CCA, especially in those with extrahepatic form (43% vs 17%, p = 0.008), but not in controls. Despite similar tumor stage, these positive patients presented a trend toward a higher percentage of portal invasion (27% vs 15%) and of tumor recurrence than negative cases (62% vs 40%), although the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion These preliminary results indicate that bile testing for SCCA is a specific marker of extrahepatic CCA, with potential prognostic value.

Background: The continuous emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) with immune escape properties, such as Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529), questions the extent of the antibody-mediated protection against the virus. Here we investigated the long-term antibody persistence in previously infected subjects and the extent of the antibody-mediated protection against B.1, B.1.617.2 and BA.1 variants in unvaccinated subjects previously infected, vaccinated naïve and vaccinated previously infected subjects. Methods: Blood samples collected 15 months post-infection from unvaccinated (n=35) and vaccinated (n=41) previously infected subjects (Vo' cohort) were tested for the presence of antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) antigens using the Abbott, DiaSorin, and Roche immunoassays. The serum neutralising reactivity was assessed against B.1, B.1.617.2 (Delta), and BA.1 (Omicron) SARS-CoV-2 strains through micro-neutralisation. The antibody titres were compared to those from previous timepoints, performed at 2- and 9-months post-infection on the same individuals. Two groups of naïve subjects were used as controls, one from the same cohort (unvaccinated n=29 and vaccinated n=20) and a group of vaccinated naïve healthcare workers (n=61). Results: We report on the results of the third serosurvey run in the Vo' cohort. With respect to the 9-month time point, antibodies against the S antigen significantly decreased (P=0.0063) among unvaccinated subjects and increased (P<0.0001) in vaccinated individuals, whereas those against the N antigen decreased in the whole cohort. When compared with control groups (naïve Vo' inhabitants and naïve healthcare workers), vaccinated subjects that were previously infected had higher antibody levels (P<0.0001) than vaccinated naïve subjects. Two doses of vaccine elicited stronger anti-S antibody response than natural infection (P<0.0001). Finally, the neutralising reactivity of sera against B.1.617.2 and BA.1 was 4-fold and 16-fold lower than the reactivity observed against the original B.1 strain. Conclusions: These results confirm that vaccination induces strong antibody response in most individuals, and even stronger in previously infected subjects. Neutralising reactivity elicited by natural infection followed by vaccination is increasingly weakened by the recent emergence of VOCs. While immunity is not completely compromised, a change in vaccine development may be required going forward, to generate cross-protective pan-coronavirus immunity in the global population.

In February and March 2020, one of the first Italian clusters of SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected in the municipality of Vo’. Positive subjects were followed up at 2 and 9 months post-infection with different immuno-assays and a micro-neutralisation test. Here we report on the results of the third serosurvey conducted in the same population in June 2021, 15 months post-infection, when we tested 61% of the infected individuals (n=76). Antibodies against the spike (S) antigen significantly decreased (P<0.006, Kruskal-Wallis test) among unvaccinated subjects (n=35) and increased (P<0.0001) in vaccinated individuals (n=41), whereas those against the nucleocapsid (N) decreased in the whole cohort. From the comparison with two control groups (naïve Vo’ inhabitants (n=20) and healthcare workers (HCW, n=61)), subjects vaccinated post exposure (hybrid immunity) had higher antibody levels (P<0.0001) than subjects vaccinated when naïve. Two doses of vaccine elicited stronger anti-S antibody response than natural infection (P<0.0001). Finally, the neutralising reactivity of sera against the B.1.617.2 (Delta) was lower than compared to the B.1 strain (median 1:320 versus 1:1280 1/dil, P<0.0001, and 1:640 versus 1:2560 1/dil, P=0.0014, after one or two vaccine doses, respectively), although subjects with hybrid immunity maintained neutralising titres above 1:40 1/dil.

In February and March 2020, two mass swab testing campaigns were conducted in Vo’, Italy. In May 2020, we tested 86% of the Vo’ population with three immuno-assays detecting antibodies against the spike and nucleocapsid antigens, a neutralisation assay and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Subjects testing positive to PCR in February/March or a serological assay in May were tested again in November. Here we report on the results of the analysis of the May and November surveys. We estimate a seroprevalence of 3.5% (95% Credible Interval (CrI): 2.8–4.3%) in May. In November, 98.8% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 93.7–100.0%) of sera which tested positive in May still reacted against at least one antigen; 18.6% (95% CI: 11.0–28.5%) showed an increase of antibody or neutralisation reactivity from May. Analysis of the serostatus of the members of 1,118 households indicates a 26.0% (95% CrI: 17.2–36.9%) Susceptible-Infectious Transmission Probability. Contact tracing had limited impact on epidemic suppression.

A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2956-7.