December 1951
·
111 Reads
·
1,368 Citations
Columbia Law Review
What is this page?
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
Publications (1)
Citations (1)
... Simply put, Sutherland "started with a theory or a discipline" and became "blind to facts" (Laub 2006, p. 240 [2005). Those ostensible "facts" about crime and criminals were already well known to Sutherland through the works of Bernard, Sheldon, and Eleanor Glueck (see B. Glueck 1918Glueck , 1925Glueck & Glueck, 1930, 1950. However, Sutherland rejected theories that were non-sociological because biological theories of crime were used as a rationale for the holocaust by the Third Reich (Rafter, 2008, p. 287, 294), and he dismissed any theoretical frameworks based on personality factors and traits (Rafter, 2006, p. 38;, p. 198 [2018. ...
- Citing Article
December 1951
Columbia Law Review