Eduardo Ascarrunz’s research while affiliated with University of Fribourg and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (11)


Figure 2. Anterior plastral lobes of select turtle taxa from the Eocene of western Europe. The pleurodire Neochelys franzeni (SMF ME1091, Messel Pit, Middle Eocene) in ventral aspect (A), based on Cadena (2015). The geoemydid Palaeoemys "messeliana" (HLMD ME13437, Messel Pit, Middle Eocene) in ventral aspect (B). The geoemydid Palaeoemys "kehreri" (SMF ME11389, Messel Pit, Middle Eocene) in ventral (C) and visceral (D) aspect. Hervet's (2006) reconstruction of the "ptychogasterid" Merovemys ploegi (northern France, Early Eocene) in ventral (E) and visceral (F) aspect. The "ptychogastrid" Geiselemys ptychogastroides (GM XXVI-204/62, Geiseltal, Middle Eocene) in ventral (G) and visceral (H) aspect. Grey lines and shading represent breakage lines or regions covered by other structures.
A plastron fragment reveals a previously unrecorded turtle species in the Eocene of Messel Pit, Germany
  • Article
  • Full-text available

October 2024

·

47 Reads

Fossil Record

Eduardo Ascarrunz

·

Depending on taxonomic opinion, between four and five turtle species are well attested for the Middle Eocene Messel Pit formation of Germany. Here, we describe specimen SMF ME-3495 from the Messel collection of the Senckenberg Museum in Frankfurt, which unambiguously corresponds to an additional turtle species. The specimen consists of a partial anterior plastral lobe that can be distinguished from other Messel turtle taxa on the basis of the presence of gular tubercles, an extensive epiplastral lip, narrow gulars that lap onto the entoplastron, and a sinuous gulo-humeral sulcus. The fragment is not sufficient to diagnose another contemporary European turtle taxon, but its epiplastral lip morphology is reminiscent of “ptychogasterid” geoemydids (Cryptodira). We also remark on bone corrosion consistent with “shell disease” and distinctive coloration.

Download

Synthetic phylogeny of testudinatans highlighting many of the species and clades mentioned in the text. Based mainly on Joyce (2017), Sterli et al. (2021), and Thomson et al. (2021). Ages of divergences between extant groups are based on the estimates of Thomson et al. (2021). The stratigraphic spans of extant species and clades are not depicted. The ages of the nodes that are directly ancestral to extinct species are arbitrary.
The external anatomy of the bony carapace of testudinatans. Pholidosis is shown by the imprints (sulci) left by the borders of the corneous scutes. Kayentachelys aprix is the oldest known testudinatan that displays the complete mesochelydian plan: the general layout of bone plates and scutes that is preserved in the majority of living turtles, such as the emydid Malaclemys terrapin. Earlier testudinatans like Proganochelys quendstedti and Proterochersis porebensis (reconstructions) had more capacial scutes, and the series of marginal scutes did not meet in the posterior part of the carapace. Proterochersis also shows evidence of numerous irregular bone plates that are not present in mesochelydians; see Szczygielski & Sulej (2019) for details. Labelled elements are bone plates. Scute homologies are colour-coded. Thin lines represent bone plate sutures; thick lines represent sulci. The sutures in Proganochelys are unknown. Proganochelys after Gaffney (1990), Proterochersis after Szczygielski & Sulej (2019), Kayentachelys after Joyce (unpublished), Malaclemys by E.A.
Simulations of pholidosis of the carapace with a reaction-diffusion model. Darker colours indicate higher concentrations of activator of the first reaction diffusion-process (A1) or the inhibitor of the second reaction-diffusion process (I2). A, The beginning (t=0) and end (t=250000 iterations) of the simulation with the original parameters of Moustakas-Verho et al. (2014). The diffusion rates of A1 and its inhibitor I1 are 4 and 120, respectively. B, Simulations with lower diffusion rates of the activator and the inhibitor in the first process. The simulation with ⅛ of original diffusion rate parameters was run for 300000 iterations, and formed additional series of placodes but not scute seams. C, Comparison of simulated and real pholidosis patterns.
Comparison of the carapace pholidosis of several testudinatans. Waluchelys cavitesta after Sterli et al. (2021), Platychelys oberndorferi idealized from Sullivan & Joyce (2017), Tropidemys seebachi reconstructed from Joyce & Mäuser (2020), Clemmydospis and Sakya after Danilov (2005). The central region of the carapace of Waluchelys cavitesta is unknown.
Pileus scalation patterns in squamates. Left: Traditionally hypothesized homologies of scales between different squamate clades. Identities become clear only when the scales are large, forming scutes. Diagrams after Ursel (1978) and Gauthier et al. (2008) for Xantusia. Right: The typical pattern of pileus scutes of snakes appears in the boa Chilabothrus, nested in a clade where the likely ancestral condition was with granular scales. The same scutes can be identified in the Chilobothrus and the distantly related python Malayopython. Phylogeny after Reynolds et al. (2014) and Burbrink et al. (2020). Numbers at the nodes are the divergence times in Ma after Burbink et al. (2020).
The macroevolutionary and developmental evolution of the turtle carapacial scutes

January 2022

·

947 Reads

·

7 Citations

Vertebrate Zoology

The scutes of the carapace of extant turtles exhibit common elements in a narrow range of topographical arrangements. The typical arrangement has remained constant since its origin in the clade Mesochelydia (Early Jurassic), after a period of apparent greater diversity in the Triassic. This contribution is a review of the development and evolutionary history of the scute patterns of the carapace, seen through the lens of recent developmental models. This yields insights on pattern variations in the fossil record. We reinterpret the “supracaudal” scute and propose that Proganochelys had five vertebral scutes. We discuss the relationship between supramarginal scutes and Turing processes, and we show how a simple change during embryogenesis could account for origin of the configuration of the caudal region of the carapace in mesochelydians. We also discuss the nature of the decrease in number of scutes over the course of evolution, and whether macroevolutionary trends can be discerned. We argue that turtles with complete loss of scutes (e.g., softshells) follow clade-specific macroevolutionary regimes, which are distinct from the majority of other turtles. Finally, we draw a parallel between the variation of scute patterns on the carapace of turtles and the scale patterns in the pileus region (roof of the head) of squamates. The size and numbers of scales in the pileus region can evolve over a wide range, but we recognized tentative evidence of convergence towards a typical configuration when the scales become larger and fewer. Thus, typical patterns could be a more general property of similar systems of integumentary appendages.


Figure 3 Measurements taken to construct the log-ratio characters in Table 2. On the fossil specimens measurements with a contralateral homologue were taken on whichever side they were best preserved. On specimens of extant species, the geometry of the shell was first captured with 3D landmark coordinates and symmetrised, and then the measurements were taken as distances between landmarks. Full-size  DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11805/fig-3
Specimens added to the discrete and continuous datasets for this study.
Comparison of the phylogenetic placement methods used in this study.
The phylogenetic relationships of geoemydid turtles from the Eocene Messel Pit Quarry: a first assessment using methods for continuous and discrete characters

August 2021

·

255 Reads

·

5 Citations

The geoemydid turtles of the Eocoene Messel Pit Quarry of Hesse, Germany, are part of a rich Western European fossil record of testudinoids. Originally referred to as “ Ocadia” kehreri and “ Ocadia” messeliana , their systematic relationships remain unclear. A previous study proposed that a majority of the Western European geoemydids, including the Messel geoemydids, are closely related to the Recent European representatives of the clade Mauremys . Another study hypothesised that the Western European geoemydid fauna is more phylogenetically diverse, and that the Messel geoemydids are closely related to the East Asian turtles Orlitia and Malayemys . Here we present the first quantitative analyses to date that investigate this question. We use continuous characters in the form of ratios to estimate the placement of the Messel geoemydids in a reference tree that was estimated from molecular data. We explore the placement error obtained from that data with maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods, as well as linear parsimony in combination with discrete characters. We find good overall performance with Bayesian and parsimony analyses. Parsimony performs even better when we also incorporated discrete characters. Yet, we cannot pin down the position of the Messel geoemydids with high confidence. Depending on how intraspecific variation of the ratio characters is treated, parsimony favours a placement of the Messel fossils sister to Orlitia borneensis or sister to Geoemyda spengleri , with weak bootstrap support. The latter placement is suspect because G. spengleri is a phylogenetically problematic species with molecular and morphological data. There is even less support for placements within the Mauremys clade.


Estimating the phylogeny of geoemydid turtles (Cryptodira) from landmark data: An assessment of different methods

August 2019

·

430 Reads

·

14 Citations

Background In the last 20 years, a general picture of the evolutionary relationships between geoemydid turtles (ca. 70 species distributed over the Northern hemisphere) has emerged from the analysis of molecular data. However, there is a paucity of good traditional morphological characters that correlate with the phylogeny, which are essential for the robust integration of fossil and molecular data. Part of this problem might be due to intrinsic limitations of traditional discrete characters. Here, we explore the use of continuous data in the form of 3D coordinates of homologous landmarks on the turtle shell for phylogenetic inference and the phylogenetic placement of single species on a scaffold molecular tree. We focus on the performance yielded by sampling the carapace and/or plastral lobes and using various phylogenetic methods. Methods We digitised the landmark coordinates of the carapace and plastron of 42 and 46 extant geoemydid species, respectively. The configurations were superimposed and we estimated the phylogenetic tree of geoemydids with landmark analysis under parsimony, traditional Farris parsimony, unweighted squared-change parsimony, maximum likelihood with a Brownian motion model, and neighbour-joining on a matrix of pairwise Procrustes distances. We assessed the performance of those analyses by comparing the trees against a reference phylogeny obtained from seven molecular markers. For comparisons between trees we used difference measures based on quartets and splits. We used the same reference tree to evaluate phylogenetic placement performance by a leave-one-out validation procedure. Results Whatever method we used, similarity to the reference phylogeny was low. The carapace alone gave slightly better results than the plastron or the complete shell. Assessment of the potential for placement of single species on the reference tree with landmark data gave much better results, with similar accuracy and higher precision compared to the performance of discrete characters with parsimony.


Fig. 1 Skull of the Devonian actinopterygian Cheirolepis trailli † in lateral (a), anterior (b), and ventral (c) view (after [59]). Opercular/ branchiostegal series in red outlines with branchiostegal rays in light red fill. The pattern of these bones in this stem-actinopterygian may be considered the basic actinopterygian pattern. The elements in this succession include the operculum, suboperculum, branchiostegal rays, and gulars. Some authors include also Dh dermohyale, aOp accessory operculum, Pop preoperculum (and other absent bones here) in the series, while others exclude the gulars from it (for references see text). Any of these elements may be missing, hence the synonymous names 'opercular series', 'branchiostegal series', 'operculo-branchiostegal series', and 'operculo-gular series'. Op, operculum; Sop, suboperculum; Br, branchiostegal rays; lG, lateral gular; mG medial gular
Fig. 3 Phylogenetic distribution of mean branchiostegal ray numbers (left), and histograms of the species mean and range of branchiostegal numbers (right). The nodal ancestral values were reconstructed under the EB model, and interpolated along branches using the contMap function of the R package phytools v. 0.6 [63, 64]. Branch lengths are proportional to time. The silhouettes show the approximate position of selected clades. The age of the root is 443 Ma. Note that the intraspecific variation in the number of branchiostegals is probably underreported
On trends and patterns in macroevolution: Williston’s law and the branchiostegal series of extant and extinct osteichthyans

June 2019

·

597 Reads

·

13 Citations

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Background: The branchiostegal series consists of an alignment of bony elements in the posterior portion of the skull of osteichthyan vertebrates. We trace the evolution of the number of elements in a comprehensive survey that includes 440 extant and 66 extinct species. Using a newly updated actinopterygian tree in combination with phylogenetic comparative analyses, we test whether osteichthyan branchiostegals follow an evolutionary trend under 'Williston's law', which postulates that osteichthyan lineages experienced a reduction of bony elements over time. Results: We detected no overall macroevolutionary trend in branchiostegal numbers, providing no support for 'Williston's law'. This result is robust to the subsampling of palaeontological data, but the estimation of the model parameters is much more ambiguous. Conclusions: We find substantial evidence for a macroevolutionary dynamic favouring an 'early burst' of trait evolution over alternative models. Our study highlights the challenges of accurately reconstructing macroevolutionary dynamics even with large amounts of data about extant and extinct taxa.


Polymorphic characters in the reconstruction of the phylogeny of geoemydid turtles

October 2018

·

119 Reads

·

22 Citations

Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society

Several attempts to resolve the phylogeny of turtles in the clade Geoemydidae using morphology have been unsuccessful, in part because of unusually high levels of polymorphism. This has hindered the integration of the geoemydid fossil record into a phylogenetic framework. Many methods, shown to improve phylogenetic inference, allow the incorporation of different amounts of state frequency information from polymorphic characters into a phylogenetic analysis. Here, we present a new character matrix for the shell of geoemydids and assess the performance of polymorphism coding methods (‘majority’, ‘generalized frequency coding’, ‘polymorphic’ and ‘missing’) in a phylogenetic analysis by comparing the result topology of each method with a reference molecular phylogeny. The four coding methods failed to recover trees that were both well resolved and highly congruent with the reference phylogeny. Moreover, contrary to previous studies, the coding methods that made more use of character states frequencies did not perform better. However, a leave-one-out subsampling analysis suggested that despite these problems, the new matrix can still be used to place fossils in the geoemydid phylogeny with some reliability. Finally, we provide a list of characters that diagnose the major clades in our molecular reference tree.


Table 2 . Mean resolution and accuracy attained in species placement with the leave-one-out subsampling analysis, using the four methods for coding intraspecific variability
Figure 3. Distribution of polymorphism in the species-level morphological character matrix (with polymorphic coding method). The graphs surrounding the central image show the proportion of fixed, polymorphic, missing and inapplicable cells by character (upper graph) and by species (right graph). Out of the 4480 data cells, 963 display polymorphism (22%), and 48 out of 56 surveyed species (86%) have at least one character coded as polymorphic. All 80 characters have polymorphism for at least one species, except character 21, which is also uninformative. Character 21 relates to the presence or absence of the cervical scute. The absence is autopomorphic for Stigmochelys pardalis, but reportedly shared with other testudinids absent in our sample (Joyce & Bell, 2004). 
Table 3 . Comparison of morphological matrices of Geoemydidae from previous studies and the present study
Figure 4. Reference tree derived from molecular data, used for comparisons with the results of the morphological trees. This molecular phylogeny of Geoemydidae was derived from sequences of three mitochondrial genes and four nuclear loci of previous studies (Spinks et al., 2004; Le et al., 2007). Phylogenetic analysis was performed with maximum likelihood. The topology is mostly in agreement with the results of the studies published in the last 15 years. 
Polymorphic characters in the reconstruction of the phylogeny of geoemydid turtles

January 2018

·

842 Reads

·

5 Citations

Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society

Several attempts to resolve the phylogeny of turtles in the clade Geoemydidae using morphology have been unsuccessful , in part because of unusually high levels of polymorphism. This has hindered the integration of the geoemydid fossil record into a phylogenetic framework. Many methods, shown to improve phylogenetic inference, allow the incorporation of different amounts of state frequency information from polymorphic characters into a phylogenetic analysis. Here, we present a new character matrix for the shell of geoemydids and assess the performance of poly-morphism coding methods ('majority', 'generalized frequency coding', 'polymorphic' and 'missing') in a phylogenetic analysis by comparing the result topology of each method with a reference molecular phylogeny. The four coding methods failed to recover trees that were both well resolved and highly congruent with the reference phylogeny. Moreover, contrary to previous studies, the coding methods that made more use of character states frequencies did not perform better. However, a leave-one-out subsampling analysis suggested that despite these problems, the new matrix can still be used to place fossils in the geoemydid phylogeny with some reliability. Finally, we provide a list of characters that diagnose the major clades in our molecular reference tree.



(Caption overleaf.)
Still slow, but even steadier: An update on the evolution of turtle cranial disparity interpolating shapes along branches

November 2017

·

172 Reads

·

10 Citations

In a previous study, we estimated the cranial disparity of turtles (Testudinata) through time using geometric morphometric data from both terminal taxa and hypothetical ancestors to compensate for temporal gaps in the fossil record. While this method yielded reasonable results for the Mesozoic and the early Cenozoic, we found a large drop in cranial disparity for the Miocene, for which we found no correlation with known environmental changes or extinction events. Instead,we speculated that the Miocene dip was a result of poor sampling of fossils or ancestors in this time bin. To countervail this problem, we here updated our original dataset and interpolated changes of shape along the branch lengths and compared them with the previous data. We furthermore explored the impact of topological and temporal uncertainty, demonstrating that the Miocene dip, indeed, is a sampling artefact. All remaining conclusions of the previous study could be more or less supported, nevertheless, including an apparent correlation with global biogeographic events, a minor correlation between cranial disparity and global temperature, and resilience across the K/T extinction event.


Triadobatrachus massinoti, the earliest known lissamphibian (Vertebrata: Tetrapoda) re-examined by μCT scan, and the evolution of trunk length in batrachians

June 2016

·

1,122 Reads

·

61 Citations

Contributions to Zoology

Triadobatrachus massinoti is a batrachian known from a single fossil from the Early Triassic of Madagascar that presents a combination of apomorphic salientian and plesiomorphic batrachian characters. Herein we offer a revised description of the specimen based on X-ray micro-tomography data. We report previously unknown caudal vertebrae, possible mentomeckelians, and hidden parts of other structures. We also confirm the presence of a ventrolateral ledge on the opisthotic, and we rectify some previous interpretations. There are no cervical ribs and the jaw may have had an angular. The presacral region is composed of 15 vertebrae with a unique atlas-axis complex instead of 14 vertebrae with a bipartite atlas. The configuration of the pelvic girdle is not very clear, although it is likely more plesiomorphic than the anu-ran-like condition previously assumed. Our re-assessment of the saltatorial performance of Triadobatrachus supports the traditional interpretation that this animal was not a specialised jumper. In order to assess the sequence of events in the early evolution of the salientian morphotype, we estimated the ancestral length of the trunk region of batrachians under different hypotheses of lissamphibian relationships and divergence times. Most of our results suggest that some trunk reduction took place before the divergence of caudates and salientians (presumably in the Per-mian), and that the trunk of Triadobatrachus mostly reflects this ancestral condition. Thus, trunk reduction possibly preceded the anteroposterior elongation of the ilia and the shortening of the tail seen in Triadobatrachus. We also provide an updated review of the data relevant for the use of Triadobatrachus as a calibration constraint in molecular divergence age analyses that meets recently-suggested standards.


Citations (8)


... The general plan of the pholidosis (scutation) arose in the early stages of turtle evolution and turned out to be stable for more than 200 million years (Gaffney, 1990;Ascarrunz and Sánchez-Villagra, 2022). This stability is connected with the conservatism of the genetic basis of the pholidosis, which determines the stability of the morphogenetic processes (Moustakas-Verho and Cherepanov, 2015). ...

Reference:

Carapace Scute Variations of the Olive Ridley Sea Turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea): Polymerization as an Evolutionary Trend
The macroevolutionary and developmental evolution of the turtle carapacial scutes

Vertebrate Zoology

... Claude and Tong (2004) proposed a systematic treatment that synonymizes Hervet's genera into Palaeoemys and considers the two morphotypes as juvenile and adult forms of a single species: Palaeoemys messeliana. As some other authors before us (e.g., Cadena et al. 2018), we follow the latter assessment in this contribution, but the matter remains unsettled (Ascarrunz et al. 2021). ...

The phylogenetic relationships of geoemydid turtles from the Eocene Messel Pit Quarry: a first assessment using methods for continuous and discrete characters

... If choosing to discretize GMM data for phylogenetic analysis [22,23], another difficulty is in characterising and coding (i.e., discretizing) landmarks into character states. Moreover, arbitrarily delimiting discrete states from variation that is inherently continuous [24] (i.e., GMM; shape) can result in information loss [25]. ...

Estimating the phylogeny of geoemydid turtles (Cryptodira) from landmark data: An assessment of different methods

... The number of vertebrae is another important meristic trait in teleost fishes. Vertebrae numbers have been associated with various environmental factors (Hubbs, 1940;Lindsey, 1975;Maxwell & Wilson, 2013;McDowall, 2008), as well as body elongation, suggesting this variation might often be predictable and adaptive Ascarrunz et al., 2019;Reyes-Corral & Aguirre, 2019). ...

On trends and patterns in macroevolution: Williston’s law and the branchiostegal series of extant and extinct osteichthyans

BMC Evolutionary Biology

... The taxonomy of the geoemydid turtles (Testudinoidea) from Messel is far more contentious: the number of potentially attested species ranges between one and four. A major cause for the divergence of opinions is the extensive intraspecific variation present in geoemydids in particular (Garbin et al. 2018), and in testudinoids in general (Joyce and Bell 2004). Two morphotypes of geoemydids were first considered as two species called Ocadia messeliana Staesche, 1928 and Ocadia kehreri Staesche, 1928, and later attributed by Hervet (2004a) to her new genera Francellia and Euroemys, respectively. ...

Polymorphic characters in the reconstruction of the phylogeny of geoemydid turtles
  • Citing Article
  • October 2018

Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society

... Updated studies (e.g., Lovich & Ernst, 1989) show the polymorphic states exist in Mauremys reevesii, rejecting the recognition of Chinemys pani. Our re-examination of the casts (the actual fossil is lost) corroborates its Mauremys affinity: a joint bony bridge between the carapace and plastron and the anteriorly short-sided margins on the second to sixth neural bones (Garbin et al., 2018). In addition, the joint bony bridge instead of a plastral hinge differs from the geoemydid Cuora, Cyclemys, and Notochelys; short-sided margins on the second to sixth neural bones anteriorly distinguish from the geoemydid Heosemys, Pangshura, Melanochelys, Geoemyda, and Rhinoclemmys; and lack of serration on the posterior peripherals differentiates from the geoemydid Heosemys and Geoemyda. ...

Polymorphic characters in the reconstruction of the phylogeny of geoemydid turtles

Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society

... Due to its unique anatomy among extant amniotes, the turtle cranium has played a central role in studies on turtle ancestry and evolution (e.g., Gaffney 1979;Gaffney, Tong, and Meylan 2006;Joyce 2007;Sterli et al. 2010;Anquetin 2012;Bever et al. 2015;Schoch and Sues 2016;Joyce et al. 2016;Evers and Benson 2019;Werneburg and Maier 2019;Ferreira and Werneburg 2019). Cranial disparity of turtles is reasonably well understood, with various studies having assessed disparity based on linear measurements of functional significance (e.g., Herrel, O'Reilly, and Richmond 2002), geometric morphometrics (Claude et al. 2004;Ferreira et al. 2015;Foth and Joyce 2016;Foth, Rabi, and Joyce 2017;Foth, Ascurranz, and Joyce 2017;Hermanson et al. 2022), the topology of cranial bones (Miller et al. 2023), the topography of triturating surfaces (Shipps, Peecook, and Angielczyk 2023), or skull size (e.g., Claude et al. 2004;Hermanson et al. 2022). These studies variously focus on extant turtles or include fossils, and some of them study disparity trends through time, whereas most assess the relationships of cranial anatomy with ecology. ...

Still slow, but even steadier: An update on the evolution of turtle cranial disparity interpolating shapes along branches

... It is known from the Carnian and perhaps the Norian, i.e. only in the Upper Triassic, whereas lissamphibians (real ones!) such as Triadobatrachus (Ascarrunz et al. 2016) and Czatkobatrachus (Evans & Borsuk-Białynicka 2009) had already appeared by the Lower Triassic, at least 10 Ma earlier. ...

Triadobatrachus massinoti, the earliest known lissamphibian (Vertebrata: Tetrapoda) re-examined by μCT scan, and the evolution of trunk length in batrachians

Contributions to Zoology