Edgard Dewitte's research while affiliated with Sciences Po Paris and other places
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publications (6)
What is the impact of campaign spending on votes? Does it vary across election types, political parties or electoral settings? Estimating these effects requires comprehensive data on spending across candidates, parties and elections, as well as identification strategies that handle the endogenous and strategic nature of campaign spending in multipa...
Citations
... As well as the advantages potentially gained by donors, donations may favour one party over another. Literature has some contrasting results, but recent research supports the claim that greater fundraising has a positive impact on electoral success (Samuels, 2001;Griffiths, Wood and Chen, 2020;Schuster, 2020;Cagé and Dewitte, 2021;Bekkouche, Cagé and Dewitte, 2022). In September 2022, the Economist surveyed recent US data showing that better-thanaverage fundraising is a strong predictor of better-than-average electoral success, concluding: 'Money still matters.' ...
![[object Object]](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/278818137886735-1443486832885_Q64/Julia-Cage.jpg)
... As well as the advantages potentially gained by donors, donations may favour one party over another. Literature has some contrasting results, but recent research supports the claim that greater fundraising has a positive impact on electoral success (Samuels, 2001;Griffiths, Wood and Chen, 2020;Schuster, 2020;Cagé and Dewitte, 2021;Bekkouche, Cagé and Dewitte, 2022). In September 2022, the Economist surveyed recent US data showing that better-thanaverage fundraising is a strong predictor of better-than-average electoral success, concluding: 'Money still matters.' ...
... campaign spending) on candidates' vote shares within the same constituency is complicated by the fact that these shares are highly correlated (they need to sum up to 1). In our article, we rely on Bekkouche et al. (2022) and solve this issue by adapting a discrete choice model (Conditional Logit) to the use of aggregate voting data. In these models, regression coefficients are interpreted as relative probabilities of choosing each alternative compared to a baseline category. ...
Reference: When Does Money Matter for Elections?
