January 2025
·
10 Reads
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Background Although community engagement has had a substantial presence in public health research, community input to inform geospatial and health analyses remains underutilized and novel. This article reports on community engagement activities to solicit stakeholder perspectives on the role of neighborhood conditions in health and cancer. We discuss how this community input refined an a priori conceptual model to be tested in the larger Families, Friends, and Neighborhoods Study. Methods We conducted semistructured virtual interviews with 82 stakeholders (e.g., community and faith leaders, educators, and healthcare workers) across four states (Maryland, Connecticut, Alabama, and Missouri). Participants discussed the impact where a person lives can have on their health and cancer risk. We subsequently convened a virtual group discussion with 17 randomly selected interviewees. Our study team individually reviewed discussion notes, which were synthesized into a consensus document. Results In addition to constructs from the original conceptual model, participants identified neighborhood-level factors not present in the original model, including K-12 educational quality, local property investment, homelessness, public transportation infrastructure, proximity to healthcare facilities, environmental toxin exposures, access to healthy foods, and cost of living. These factors will be incorporated into the Families, Friends, and Neighborhoods Study analytic models. Conclusions Although geospatial analyses in health research have not traditionally employed community engagement techniques, this study illustrates the value of informing multilevel analytic models with the lived experiences of those negatively affected by neighborhood conditions that underlie the risk, prevention, and screening behaviors driving cancer incidence and mortality. Impact Future social epidemiology research can be enriched through community engagement.