May 2025
·
1 Read
ESMO Open
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
May 2025
·
1 Read
ESMO Open
May 2025
·
1 Read
ESMO Open
May 2025
ESMO Open
May 2025
·
3 Reads
ESMO Open
May 2025
ESMO Open
May 2025
·
1 Read
ESMO Open
May 2025
·
4 Reads
ESMO Open
May 2025
·
8 Reads
ESMO Open
December 2024
·
9 Reads
Senologie - Zeitschrift für Mammadiagnostik und -therapie
Die Inzidenz von Brustkrebs ist in den letzten 2 Jahrzehnten gestiegen; gleichzeitig hat sich das Überleben durch eine frühere Erkennung und bessere Therapiemöglichkeiten verbessert. Trotz dieser Verbesserungen treten lokoregionäre Rezidive sowie Fernmetastasen bei bis zu 10 resp. 30 % aller mit Brustkrebs im Frühstadium diagnostizierten Frauen auf. Rund 70 % aller Brustkrebsfälle sind HR+ (hormonrezeptorpositiv), HER2– (humaner epidermaler Wachstumsfaktor-Rezeptor-2-negativ) und somit mit einem anhaltenden Rezidivrisiko assoziiert, das bis zu 20 Jahre nach der Diagnose/Erstbehandlung anhält. Wir führten eine narrative Übersichtsarbeit durch und kombinierten dabei unsere Suche in PubMed mit unseren klinischen Erfahrungen, um die Patientinnen-Charakteristika, Biomarker und Instrumente zur Analyse von Genomprofilen zu beschreiben, die Klinik-Ärztinnen und ‑ärzten zur Identifizierung von Patientinnen mit HR+, HER2– frühem Mammakarzinom mit einem hohen Rezidivrisiko zur Verfügung stehen, und um Empfehlungen zur Klassifizierung von Patientinnen gemäß ihrem Rezidivrisiko aufzustellen. Es wurden auch nationale und internationale Behandlungsrichtlinien zusammengefasst. Die korrekte Einschätzung des Rezidivrisikos ist für diese Patientinnen wichtig, weil das prognostizierte Risiko die nachfolgenden Therapie-Entscheidungen steuern wird; unpräzise Einschätzungen können zur Über- bzw. Untertherapie führen, und beide Szenarien haben negative Konsequenzen für die Patientinnen. Es gibt zahlreiche prognostische Werkzeuge und Faktoren, die für die Analyse von Brustkrebs im Frühstadium empfohlen werden; es gibt aber keinen Test, der für sich genommen eine akkurate Prognose bieten kann. Da es keinen Test gibt, der für sich allein genommen imstande ist, eine akkurate Prognose zu bieten, sollte eine Kombination verschiedener Testverfahren verwendet werden. Risikoschwellen sind wichtig, da diese die Entscheidung für eine optimierte, ausgewogene Therapie bei HR+, HER2– frühem Mammakarzinom lenkt. Dennoch sollte jede prognostische Evaluierung individuell durchgeführt werden, da ein patientenspezifisches prognostisches Vorgehen wichtig ist, um eine Über- oder Untertherapie zu vermeiden.
December 2024
·
123 Reads
·
6 Citations
Nature Medicine
... and 62.3% (95% CI: 50.1-74.5) in the overall patient group and in patients with stable and active brain metastases, respectively [17]. None of these clinical trials reported on how many patients with brainstem metastasis were enrolled, but such patients were not specifically excluded from the trials [15][16][17]. ...
December 2024
Nature Medicine
... HER2DX facilitates treatment decision-making in stage I-III HER2-positive breast cancer by integrating genomic profiling with a clinical factor-based model. 23 However, regarding HER2-positive MIBC, there is still a lack of studies exploring the efficacy of anti-HER2 therapy. ...
December 2024
ESMO Open
... In addition, with improvements in systemic therapy efficacy and the rapid development of imaging techniques, the incidence of BCBM has increased in recent years (15,16). Systemic therapy has led to significant survival benefit in HER2-positive BCBMs, but due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which partially excludes macromolecules from the CNS compartment, it serves the main role in the control of the extracranial disease. ...
November 2024
Cancer Treatment Reviews
... The ILD/pneumonitis occurred in 16% of patients in the BM cohort and 12.9% in the non-BM cohort, with some cases coinciding with opportunistic infections. T-DXd showed substantial intracranial and overall activity with no new safety flags, which supports its use in HER2-positive metastatic BC, including BM patients [22,24]. ...
September 2024
Annals of Oncology
... Clinically, HER2-positive tumors identified as HER2DX ERBB2-low across several studies in both early-stage and advanced HER2-positive disease seem to respond less effectively to anti-HER2-based therapy compared to HER2DX ERBB2-medium/high tumors. 12,13,19,20 ...
May 2024
ESMO Open
... Various therapeutic approaches, including SERDs, SERCAs, PROTACs, CERANs, and other targeted drugs [10][11][12][13], have been explored to inhibit the metastatic potential of mutant ERα variants. Promisingly, clinical trials have demonstrated the e cacy of some of these agents, such as elacestrant [6] and camizestrant [5,7], in combating receptor mutations, leading to the approval of elacestrant for clinical use [2,6]. ...
May 2024
Annals of Oncology
... To date, no biomarker has been validated for predicting prognosis or treatment efficacy in advanced HER2+ breast cancer. However, in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer, the 27-gene HER2DX genomic assay, which provides a pathological complete response (pCR) likelihood score and a risk score, has demonstrated both prognostic and predictive value [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] . In addition, HER2DX provides the ERBB2 mRNA score, offering a continuous assessment of ERBB2 mRNA levels associated with HER2 protein expression, reported on a scale from 1 to 99 15 . ...
March 2024
ESMO Open
... Fourth, and of particular relevance for survival-related endpoints, the IMpassion031 trial was unblinded after pCR assessment and patients not experiencing a pCR were allowed standard systemic adjuvant chemotherapy at the investigator's discretion. This reflects the current standard of care in the postneoadjuvant setting based on the OS benefit from postoperative capecitabine in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy 14 16 , which showed no improvement in the primary endpoint (EFS) with the addition of atezolizumab to a non-anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant regimen (without adjuvant atezolizumab continuation) 17 . They also contrast with the recently reported randomized phase 3 NSABP B-59/GBG 96-GeparDouze trial that did not show a significant improvement in EFS (primary endpoint) with atezolizumab given in combination with platinum-based neoadjuvant therapy and continued as adjuvant therapy 18 . ...
October 2023
Annals of Oncology
... The observation that imlunestrant achieved significant tumor and brain exposure in preclinical models indicated broad and extensive biodistribution, which may overcome the limitations of other SERDs. This was corroborated by clinical evidence in the EMBER-2 preoperative window of opportunity phase I study (NCT04647487), in which imlunestrant tumor exposures were significantly greater than plasma exposures, and consistent target engagement and pharmacodynamic biomarker modulation was demonstrated across all evaluated dose levels in patients with ER + , HER2 � early breast cancer (27). ...
October 2023
Annals of Oncology
... Stem cell plasticity represents one of the major therapeutic challenges for differentiation therapies. Poorly differentiated tumors (portraying a mesenchymal phenotype) are better suited to tolerate chemotherapy, while well-differentiated tumors are more sensitive to treatment [203,204]. Plasticity can also dictate the changes between distinct CSC states such as ones with varying specialization for invasion and metastasis [205]. Cancer cell plasticity has been linked to the epithelial-mesenchymal transition program, which describes a constant shift through the spectrum of phenotypic states, capable of driving local invasion, generate cancer stem cells and facilitate metastasis by the dissemination of circulating tumor cells [206]. ...
August 2023
Breast Cancer Research