E.G. Guba's research while affiliated with London Deanery and other places
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publications (8)
Citations
... Regarding the primary data, we opted for purposeful sampling (Lincoln and Guba, 1985) to select our informants. We started by identifying those who would be most able to inform us about how the organizations performed and the current practices enacted by team members in their application of agile scrum. ...
... Epistemologically, this study follows a positivist approach which suggests hypotheses are developed based on a pre-defined theory and tested against quantitative data and empirical findings. The proved hypotheses allow verification or falsification and seek generalisable results (Guba and Lincoln, 1994). In this study, to test the hypothetic-deductive theory, a value-free position is taken and a quantitative methodsurvey -a positivist instrument which is an objective measurement to collect quantitative observations is employed. ...
... Sebagaimana disampaikan oleh Bogdan & Biklen (1998) yang menyatakan bahwa pendekatan kualitatif memerlukan pengamatan mendalam pada situasi yang wajar. Lebih jauh disebutkan bahwa, pendekatan kualitatif merupakan penelitian naturalistik dan sebagai suatu proses menemukan makna berdasarkan analisis induktif serta bukan sekedar proses generalisasi (Lincoln & Guba, 1985;Bogdan & Biklen, 1998;Creswell, 2010). ...
... 2 Sobre las distintas fases del desarrollo de la evaluación en los Estados Unidos, Cfr. Cronbach (1963), Stake (1967), McLaughlin (1975), House (1979House ( , 2000 y Guba y Lincoln (1986, 1989. Análisis histórico-comparativos acerca de la situación de la evaluación en distintos países pueden consultarse en Furubo et al. (2002) y Urteaga (2010). ...
... Trustworthiness ensures rigour and consistency in qualitative research. The trustworthiness of the research was assured by applying the four criteria of credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability (Guba & Lincoln, 1999). From the conception of the research topic to data analysis, the research team met regularly to discuss and reflect on the conception and theoretical aspects of the project and its design, recruitment, interview protocol, the analytical strategies, and to reach consensus. ...
... Trustworthiness was ensured by following the constructs proposed by Lincoln and Guba [25]. An audit trail of methodological decisions was maintained throughout the study to allow for confirmability while a detailed description of purposively sampled participants was done to ensure transferability. ...
... The researchers used three maps (situational, social worlds/arenas, and positional) as the main strategies for situational analysis throughout the research project (from design to reporting). Lincoln and Guba's criteria [35] were used to increase the rigor of the data in this study. Memoing, prolonged engagement with data, member checking, peer checking, coding and categorization of the emerging themes by the researchers, and establishing a consensus were all employed to assure the credibility and dependability of the findings. ...
... Different quality criteria for qualitative and quantitative research share common principles: trustworthiness, applicability, consistency, and neutrality (Frambach et al., 2013). In qualitative research, the quality is evaluated by four classic criteria: credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability (Guba and Lincoln, 1989), while in quantitative research, the quality criteria are usually internal validity, external validity, reliability, and objectivity. Since this research is a combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches, the reflections would address these principles by considering concepts from both types. ...
