January 1999
·
105 Reads
·
388 Citations
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
January 1999
·
105 Reads
·
388 Citations
January 1995
·
33 Reads
·
17 Citations
January 1994
·
995 Reads
·
10,883 Citations
January 1989
·
453 Reads
·
3,881 Citations
January 1987
·
119 Reads
·
84 Citations
January 1985
·
672 Reads
·
26,247 Citations
January 1985
·
983 Reads
·
14,893 Citations
January 1985
·
213 Reads
·
1,189 Citations
... For instance, credibility was enhanced by the high level of involvement of participants and the triangulation of methods for data collection, such as surveys, interviews, and observations (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). Member verification was conducted to allow participants to assess and validate the findings for accuracy. ...
Reference:
Social and Political Science Faculty
January 1985
... The research report process followed the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting and Publication of Qualitative Research (COREQ) [51]. Methodological rigor was ensured throughout the study following the quality criteria of Guba and Lincoln [52]. Credibility, transferability, and confirmability were used as quality criteria to guarantee the rigor of the research process. ...
January 1994
... Sebagaimana disampaikan oleh Bogdan & Biklen (1998) yang menyatakan bahwa pendekatan kualitatif memerlukan pengamatan mendalam pada situasi yang wajar. Lebih jauh disebutkan bahwa, pendekatan kualitatif merupakan penelitian naturalistik dan sebagai suatu proses menemukan makna berdasarkan analisis induktif serta bukan sekedar proses generalisasi (Lincoln & Guba, 1985;Bogdan & Biklen, 1998;Creswell, 2010). ...
January 1995
... En la década de 1990, la evaluación tuvo un resurgimiento gracias a la corriente de la nueva gestión pública en Reino Unido. Esto promovió cambios tanto en la medición de resultados como en la generación plural de enfoques de evaluación (Guba y Lincoln, 1987). ...
January 1987
... Otros autores recurren a la triangulación para apoyar la credibilidad en sus escritos; aquella se aplica a la solución de problemas estudiándolos desde varias perspectivas, utilizando diferentes métodos, investigadores, lugares, tiempos (transversales, longitudinales); es el caso de Baltes, Reese y Nesselroade (1981); Denzin (1970); Lin (1976);Smith (1975). Por su parte, en trabajos como los de Fusch, Fusch y Ness (2019) se usan las nociones de "dependability, credibility, transferability, and confirmability" de Lincoln y Guba (1997). La "transferibilidad" viene a ser el grado de transferencia a otros contextos; la "dependencia" es equivalente a la fiabilidad y la "confirmabilidad" se vincula a que otros investigadores pueden avalar los resultados, y la "credibilidad" la aumenta la adecuación entre la información del investigador y la de los investigados. ...
January 1999
... During a member check, participants can re-examine their dialogue with the researcher (e.g., Stoner et al., 2005) or use their firsthand knowledge of the research context to identify instances where a researcher's interpretations deviate from participants' lived experiences (Hammersley & Atkinson, 1983). Through member checking, researchers aim to enhance the credibility (i.e., the results reflect participants' lived experiences), dependability (i.e., the results are consistent with the data), and the overall trustworthiness of their research (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). Examples of member checking used in past research include returning transcripts to participants for 1 College of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Canada feedback (e.g., Carlson, 2010), focus groups (e.g., Krueger & Casey, 2000), editing transcripts alongside participants (e.g., Doyle, 2007), interviews drawing from the analysis of a single participant's data (e.g., Harvey, 2015), and eliciting participant feedback on a synthesized report of the study results (e.g., Koelsch, 2013). ...
January 1985
... Regular discussions between the researchers helped identify and address potential biases, ensuring that interpretations remained grounded in the participants' perspectives rather than preconceived notions, in line with the principles of rigorous qualitative research as outlined by Olmos-Vega et al. [23]. Additionally, peer debriefing sessions were held, during which an external expert reviewed the findings to ensure that they were firmly grounded in the data [24]. ...
January 1985
... To guarantee the rigor of the research data, four criteria were employed for its assessment. Specifically, credibility, transferability, reliability and confirmability, as proposed by Lincoln and Guba [30]. To assess the credibility of the study, the researchers spent almost a year in the PTB department, during which time they familiarized themselves with the study environment and established trustworthy relationships with HCWs, patients and families. ...
January 1989