Don M. Snider’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Dissent and Strategic Leadership of the Military Professions
  • Article

December 2008

·

1,996 Reads

·

38 Citations

Orbis

Don M. Snider

One of the central difficulties to a right understanding of American civil-military relations is the nature of the U.S. military. Are our armed forces just obedient bureaucracies like most of the Executive branch, or are they vocational professions granted significant autonomy and a unique role in these relationships because of their expert knowledge and their expertise to apply it in the defense of America? To a large measure, the answer to this question should determine the behavior of the strategic leaders of these professions, including the uncommon behavior of public dissent. Using the “Revolt of the Generals” in 2006 as stimulus, the author develops from the study of military professions the critical trust relationships that should have informed their individual decisions to dissent. After doing so, he makes recommendations for the restoration of the professions’ ethic in this critical area of behavior by the senior Officers who are the professions’ strategic leaders.

Citations (1)


... Nonetheless, we can see the contours of the responsibility and values school in various ways as scholars explore what it means to be a military professional. For example, in the language of bureaucratic values, scholars seek to understand the political behavior of members of the military and veteran communities (Brooks, 2009;Coletta & Crosbie, 2021;Urben, 2014), military advising (McMaster, 1998, and leadership (Snider, 2008). Students of civil-military relations also investigate professionalism vis-à-vis ethics and public values, wherein they investigate obedience, dissent, and resignation (Feaver, 2017;Golby, 2015;Snider, 2017); (organizational) culture (Herspring, 2005;Mansoor & Murray, 2019); and political attitudes and values (Ulrich, 2021). ...

Reference:

Accountability, Bureaucratic Discretion, and Civil-Military Relations
Dissent and Strategic Leadership of the Military Professions
  • Citing Article
  • December 2008

Orbis