Domenic Sievert’s research while affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


FIGURE 1: The identified lesions for (a-b) T11 and (c-d) S2, as shown on MRI, and (e) gastrosplenic lymph node, as shown on CT.
FIGURE 2: Physical doses per fraction for the scheduled and adapted plans for (a) stomach, (b) esophagus, (c) spinal canal OAR constraints, and (d) optimization target volume coverage.
FIGURE 3: Comparison of the adapted versus scheduled plan for fraction five of the adapted gastrosplenic lymph node treatment. The 600 cGy isodose line represents the fractional OAR dose constraint and is shown for the (a) adapted and (b) scheduled plan, respectively. The 700 cGy isodose line represents the goal for optimization of PTV coverage and is shown for the adapted (c) and scheduled (d) plans.
Complex Multi-site Stereotactic Body Re-irradiation With CT-Guided Online Adaptive Radiotherapy
  • Article
  • Full-text available

September 2024

·

5 Reads

Cureus

Domenic Sievert

·

Alden D'Souza

·

Xiaodong Zhao

·

[...]

·

Dean Hobbis

Online adaptive radiotherapy optimizes a patient's treatment plan to their daily anatomy to account for inter-fraction motion. Daily target and organ-at-risk (OAR) delineation allows for optimized treatments and has been shown to have favorable outcomes in the abdominal region. Adaptive radiotherapy also has the potential to support fine control of dose in re-irradiation to OARs. Herein, we describe a complex multi-site re-irradiation case utilizing CT-guided adaptive radiotherapy. A 46-year-old man with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma presented for re-irradiation of four metastatic lesions to the right acetabulum, T11, S2, and a gastrosplenic lymph node (gsLN). The right acetabulum, T11, and S2 lesions previously received 20 Gy in five fractions. For the current course, he was prescribed 35 Gy (T11, right acetabulum, and gsLN) and 30 Gy (S2) in five fractions. An equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was employed to assess cumulative doses for critical OARs and guide planning. The re-irradiated lesions were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and the gsLN was treated with adaptive radiotherapy. An isotoxic approach was utilized to create the scheduled and adapted plans for the gsLN. Adapted plans were created on the patient’s daily anatomy as visualized on kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography and compared against the scheduled plan. Dose-volume histogram objectives were used to compare the plans, and the superior plan was chosen for delivery. The adapted plan was used for all five fractions and met all critical OAR constraints while maintaining target coverage. The use of the scheduled plan would have resulted in stomach and/or esophagus constraint violations on all five fractions. This resulted in reduced EQD2 doses of 6.4 and 12.3 Gy for the esophagus and stomach, respectively. We report the successful treatment of a patient undergoing tri-site SBRT re-irradiation with concurrent CT-guided adaptive radiotherapy to a gsLN. The adaptive treatment allowed us to meet critical OAR constraints while maintaining target coverage. Few studies have described the use of CT-guided adaptive radiotherapy in re-irradiation cases, and the potential benefit for these complex cases is evident.

Download

First clinical experience of correcting phantom-based image distortion related to gantry position on a 0.35T MR-Linac

October 2021

·

45 Reads

·

7 Citations

MR-guided radiotherapy requires strong imaging spatial integrity to deliver high quality plans and provide accurate dose calculation. The MRI system, however, can be compromised by the integrated linear accelerator (Linac), resulting in inaccurate imaging isocenter position and geometric distortion. Dependence on gantry position further complicates the correction of distortions. This work presents a new clinical application of a commercial phantom and software system that quantifies isocenter alignment and geometric distortion, as well as providing a deformation vector field (DVF). A large distortion phantom and a smaller grid phantom were imaged at multiple gantry angles from 0 to 330° on a 0.35 T integrated MR-Linac. The software package was used to assess geometric distortion and generate DVFs to correct distortions within the phantom volume. The DVFs were applied to the grid phantom with resampling software then evaluated using structural similarity index measure (SSIM). Scans were also performed with a ferromagnetic clip near the phantom to investigate the correction of more severe artifacts. The mean magnitude isocenter shift was 0.67 mm, ranging from 0.25 to 1.04 mm across all angles. The DVF had a mean component value of 0.27 ± 0.02, 0.24 ± 0.01, and 0.19 ± 0.01 mm in the right-left (RL), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions. The ferromagnetic clip increased isocenter position error from 1.98 mm to 2.20 mm and increased mean DVF component values in the RL and AP directions. The resampled grid phantom had an increased SSIM for all gantry angles compared to original images, increasing from 0.26 ± 0.001 to 0.70 ± 0.004. Through this clinical assessment, we were able to correct geometric distortion and isocenter shift related to gantry position on a 0.35 T MR-Linac using the distortion phantom and software package. This provides encouragement that it could be used for quality assurance and clinically to correct systematic distortion caused by imaging at different gantry angles.

Citations (1)


... Similar to the design of the Unity MRI-linac, the rotating gantry for the linac causes metal components to be rotating relative to the static MR magnetic field, which causes B 0 inhomogeneities. The MRIdian system also incorporates gantry-angle-specific active shimming to compensate for these distortions that have been shown to influence the location of the imaging isocenter (Lewis et al., 2021b) and diffusion-weighted imaging (Lewis et al., 2021a). Full gantry rotation is limited in that it cannot rotate through the region between 30° and 33°. ...

Reference:

ICRU REPORT 97: MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy Using MRI-Linear Accelerators
First clinical experience of correcting phantom-based image distortion related to gantry position on a 0.35T MR-Linac