Dmitrii Murashkin’s research while affiliated with University of Bremen and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (21)


Application-Specific Synthetic Aperture Radar Image Clustering with Convolutional Autoencoders on Example of Sentinel-1 Scenes Acquired Over Sea Ice
  • Conference Paper

July 2024

·

6 Reads

Dmitrii Murashkin


Helicopter flight locations and flight patterns. The colored track shows the drift of RV Polarstern from October 2019 until June 2020. The black triangles represent the location of the 35 helicopter flights. Additionally, as inlay on the left, we show a typical local (turquoise) and regional (orange) flight pattern with Polarstern as the center (black triangle). The red box marks the Central Observatory (CO) area (see Figure S3 in the supplemental material for more information on the CO).
Lead classification example for the flight on October 20, 2019. (A) Results from steps 0, 1, and 2 for the iterative threshold selection; (B) the gridded surface temperature maps; (C) the temperature distribution of (B); and (D) final (step 5) binary lead classification based on data in (B). The red vertical line in (C) represents the iterative temperature threshold found to discriminate between lead surfaces (red area) and no lead surfaces (gray areas; in (A) and (D))
Lead segmentation to derive lead width and orientation properties. Two lead segments from the lead classification result of the flight on October 20, 2019, with the temperature map on the left and the lead classification including the ellipse geometry on the right. The major axis (solid) and minor axis (dotted) of each ellipse are shown. The dashed rectangle marks the area from which the classified area in red was determined. (A) A narrow lead with mean width of 3 m and orientation (of the major axis) of −41°. (B) A wider and slightly scattered lead with mean width of 26 m and orientation of −86°.
Evolution of MOSAiC surface temperatures from 35 helicopter flights. (A) Temporal evolution of the average surface temperature of each flight throughout winter 2019/2020 from October 2, 2019, to April 23, 2020. Black indicates the local flights covering the Central Observatory. They are connected to show the temporal evolution of the primary MOSAiC observation area. The regional flights, repeatedly visiting the L-Sites in the MOSAiC distributed network, are displayed in blue, whereas green shows additional flights not falling in one of these two categories. The gray line represents the 2 m air temperature measured at the floe in Met City (location for meteorological measurements within the Central Observatory). In the lower panel, a selection of surface temperature distributions is shown for different dates in the winter for (B) the local and (C) the regional flights. The colors continue from blue (begin of the winter) to red (end of the winter).
Connection between the standard deviation of surface temperature and the 10 m wind speed. For each flight, the standard deviation of the surface temperature is set in connection to the 10 m wind speed as the 10-min average around target time, shown as points. The correlation coefficient (r) is −0.38; the significance is 0.04 (p-value). The color of the points indicates the average surface temperature of the whole flight, as presented in the colorbar. The different point shapes represent the flight types: Central Observatory (CO, circle), L-Site/regional (cross), and events (square).

+4

Spatio-temporal variability of small-scale leads based on helicopter maps of winter sea ice surface temperatures
  • Article
  • Full-text available

March 2024

·

64 Reads

·

4 Citations

Observations of sea ice surface temperature provide crucial information for studying Arctic climate, particularly during winter. We examined 1 m resolution surface temperature maps from 35 helicopter flights between October 2, 2019, and April 23, 2020, recorded during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC). The seasonal cycle of the average surface temperature spanned from 265.6 K on October 2, 2019, to 231.8 K on January 28, 2020. The surface temperature was affected by atmospheric changes and varied across scales. Leads in sea ice (cracks of open water) were of particular interest because they allow greater heat exchange between ocean and atmosphere than thick, snow-covered ice. Leads were classified by a temperature threshold. The lead area fraction varied between 0% and 4% with higher variability on the local (5–10 km) than regional scale (20–40 km). On the regional scale, it remained stable at 0–1% until mid-January, increasing afterward to 4%. Variability in the lead area is caused by sea ice dynamics (opening and closing of leads), as well as thermodynamics with ice growth (lead closing). We identified lead orientation distributions, which varied between different flights but mostly showed one prominent orientation peak. The lead width distribution followed a power law with a negative exponent of 2.63, which is in the range of exponents identified in other studies, demonstrating the comparability to other data sets and extending the existing power law relationship to smaller scales down to 3 m. The appearance of many more narrow leads than wide leads is important, as narrow leads are not resolved by current thermal infrared satellite observations. Such small-scale lead statistics are essential for Arctic climate investigations because the ocean–atmosphere heat exchange does not scale linearly with lead width and is larger for narrower leads.

Download

Lead fractions from SAR-derived sea ice divergence during MOSAiC

March 2024

·

155 Reads

·

9 Citations

Leads and fractures in sea ice play a crucial role in the heat and gas exchange between the ocean and atmosphere, impacting atmospheric, ecological, and oceanic processes. We estimated lead fractions from high-resolution divergence obtained from satellite synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data and evaluated them against existing lead products. We derived two new lead fraction products from divergence with a spatial resolution of 700 m calculated from daily Sentinel-1 images. For the first lead product, we advected and accumulated the lead fractions of individual time instances. With those accumulated divergence-derived lead fractions, we comprehensively described the presence of up to 10 d old leads and analyzed their deformation history. For the second lead product, we used only divergence pixels that were identified as part of linear kinematic features (LKFs). Both new lead products accurately captured the formation of new leads with widths of up to a few hundred meters. We presented a Lagrangian time series of the divergence-based lead fractions along the drift of the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition in the central Arctic Ocean during winter 2019–2020. Lead activity was high in fall and spring, consistent with wind forcing and ice pack consolidation. At larger scales of 50–150 km around the MOSAiC expedition, lead activity on all scales was similar, but differences emerged at smaller scales (10 km). We compared our lead products with six others from satellite and airborne sources, including classified SAR, thermal infrared, microwave radiometer, and altimeter data. We found that the mean lead fractions varied by 1 order of magnitude across different lead products due to different physical lead and sea ice properties observed by the sensors and methodological factors such as spatial resolution. Thus, the choice of lead product should align with the specific application.


Arctic Wintertime Sea Ice Lead Detection From Sentinel-1 SAR Images

January 2024

·

140 Reads

·

1 Citation

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Leads are almost linear fractures within the ice pack, which are commonly observed in polar regions. In wintertime, leads promote energy flux from the underlying ocean to the atmosphere. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) can monitor leads at a finer spatial resolution than other spaceborne datasets, regardless of solar illumination and atmospheric conditions. However, the SAR-based lead detection methods proposed to date are restricted to some specific areas, instead of the entire Arctic. In this paper, we present a generalized deep learning-based approach for automatic sea ice lead detection (SILDET) in the Arctic wintertime using Sentinel-1 SAR images. The validation results show that SILDET has the capability of detecting open and frozen leads at different stages of development. Compared with visual interpretation of Sentinel-1 images, the overall detection accuracy is 97.80% and the Kappa coefficient is 0.88. The lead map of a regional study obtained from SILDET was compared to that from a previous SAR-based lead detection method and a lead dataset based on Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data. The lead map was also validated using Sentinel-2 images. The result shows that SILDET can provide a more detailed distribution of leads and better estimation of lead width and area. SILDET was applied to present the Arctic-wide lead distribution from January to April 2023 with a spatial resolution of 40 m. The Arctic-wide lead width distribution follows a power law with an average exponent of 1.65. The SILDET approach can be expected to provide long-term high-resolution lead distribution records.


Figure 3. Time series of lead opening, closing, and reactivation from March 14-27. The aerial plots show opening (red) and closing (blue) in a circle with 50 km radius around R/V Polarstern. The values of the pixels within the dashed line were averaged and are shown by the blue bars. The black dashed line connecting the blue bars accumulates the opening and closing given by the blue bars. The lead width was calculated from the lead fractions assuming that divergence took place only in one direction.
Lead fractions from SAR-derived sea ice divergence during MOSAiC

August 2023

·

189 Reads

·

6 Citations

Leads and fractures in sea ice play a crucial role in the heat and gas exchange between the ocean and atmosphere, impacting atmospheric, ecological, and oceanic processes. Our aim was to estimate lead fractions from high-resolution divergence obtained from satellite synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) data and to evaluate it against existing lead products. We derived two new lead-fraction products from divergence with a spatial resolution of 700 m calculated from daily Sentinel-1 images. For the first lead product, we advected and accumulated the lead fractions of individual time steps. With those accumulated divergence-derived lead fractions, we described comprehensively the presence of up to 10-day-old leads and analyzed their deformation history. For the second lead product, we used only divergence pixels that were identified as part of linear kinematic features (LKFs). Both new lead products accurately captured the formation of new leads with widths of a few hundred meters. We presented a Lagrangian time series of the divergence-based lead fractions along the drift of the MOSAiC expedition in the central Arctic Ocean during winter 2019/2020. Lead activity was high in fall and spring, consistent with wind forcing and ice pack consolidation. At larger scales of 50–150 km around the MOSAiC expedition, lead activity on all scales was similar, but differences emerged at smaller scales (10 km). We compared our lead products with 6 others from satellite and airborne sources, including classified SAR, thermal infrared, microwave radiometer, and altimeter data. We found that the mean lead fractions varied by 1 magnitude across different lead products due to different physical lead and sea ice properties observed by the sensors and methodological factors such as spatial resolution. Thus, the choice of lead product should align with the specific application.



Figure 2. Evolution of MOSAiC surface temperatures from 35 helicopter flights. (A) Temporal evolution of the average surface temperature throughout winter 2019/2020 from 02 October 2019 to 23 April 2020. Black indicates the local flights covering the Central Observatory (CO). They are connected to show the temporal evolution of the primary MOSAiC observation area. The regional flights, repeatedly visiting the L-Sites in the MOSAiC distributed network, are displayed in blue, whereas green shows additional flights not falling in one of these two categories. The grey line represents the 2 m air temperature measured at the floe in Met City. In the lower panel, a selection of surface temperature distributions is shown for different dates in the winter for (B) the local and (C) the regional flights. The colors continue from blue (begin of the winter) to red (end of the winter).
Figure 4. Lead classification example for the flight on 20 October 2019. (A) Results from steps 0, 1, and 2 for the iterative threshold selection. (D) Final (step 5) binary lead classification based on (B) the gridded surface temperature maps. (C) The temperature distribution of (B). The red vertical line represents the found iterative temperature threshold to discriminate between "lead" and "no lead" surfaces.
Figure 8. Orientation angles of leads for three example cases. Probability density distribution for the orientation angles of the flight from (A) 07 January 2020, (B) 28 January 2020, and (C) 21 March 2020, as polar histogram. The radius indicated the probability density, which is different for all three cases. Only lead segments with an axis ratio (major/minor) 2 are included. We discriminate between two cases: leads of all widths included (gray) and only leads with a minimum width of 3 m included (orange). The lead orientation have only a range of 180°but are valid in both directions, they are mirrored to the opposite direction (slightly transparent). The total number of lead segments used for the histograms (270°to 90°only) are (all; 3 m): A=(1736; 500), B=(1326; 303); C=(1378; 464).
Spatio-temporal variability of small-scale leads based on helicopter winter sea ice surface temperatures

April 2023

·

100 Reads

·

3 Citations

Surface temperature is crucial in studying the Arctic climate, particularly during winter. We examine 1 m resolution surface temperature maps of 35 helicopter flights between 02 October 2019 and 23 April 2020, recorded during the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC). The seasonal cycle of the average surface temperature spans from 265.6 K on 02 October 2019 to 231.8 K on 28 January 2020. The surface temperature is affected by atmospheric changes and also varies across scales. Furthermore, we concentrate on leads in sea ice because they allow for greater heat exchange between ocean and atmosphere than thick, snow-covered ice. Leads, which appear considerably warmer than sea ice, are classified by a temperature threshold. The local scale (5–10 km) lead area fraction varies between 0% and 4% with a higher variability than on a regional scale (20–40 km), where leads cover a more stable fraction of 0-1% until mid-January when it increases to 4%. The variability in the lead area is caused by sea ice dynamics (opening and closing of leads), as well as thermodynamics with ice growth (lead closing). To understand better the ice rheology throughout the winter, we identify lead orientation distributions. We find that the orientation varies between different flights but the distribution mostly shows one prominent orientation peak. Thus, we are not able to determine predominant intersection angles, which would need two modes in the orientation distribution. The lead width distribution follows a power law with a negative exponent of 2.63, which agrees with literature values, proves the comparability to other datasets, and extends the existing relationship to the smaller scales, as observed here. The appearance of many more small leads compared to wider leads is important since they only occur on the sub-footprint scale of thermal infrared satellite data. Sub-satellite-footprint lead statistics are essential for Arctic-climate investigations because the ocean-atmosphere heat exchange does not scale linearly with lead area fraction and is larger for smaller leads.




Citations (9)


... In addition to this, only a few parts of a staircase structure failing detection can cause the whole staircase to be undetectable, where "few" can be "one," considering the 2-layer limit for a detected staircase. Spatial variability of ice freezing processes and cover, and hence also of the impact of winter mixing, (over scales of 100 m to 10 km perhaps, noting that leads in Arctic sea ice exhibit higher area-fraction variability at 5-10 km scale than at larger scales according to Thielke et al., 2024), likely exacerbates this binary detectability outcome. ...

Reference:

Climate Change Drives Evolution of Thermohaline Staircases in the Arctic Ocean
Spatio-temporal variability of small-scale leads based on helicopter maps of winter sea ice surface temperatures

... 13°35ʹ14.4ʺE with approximately 1.5 m mean ice thickness for first year ice (Itkin et al., 2023;von Albedyll et al., 2023). During the event, a large lead separated the ice field in two resulting in a large quasi-linear deformation zone (marked in blue in Figure 1b2) and a zone of mixed deformation modes (marked in turquoise). ...

Lead fractions from SAR-derived sea ice divergence during MOSAiC

... Generally, the lead area fraction for the MOSAiC winter seems to align with the climatological mean, although it might have been influenced by the changing location due to the MOSAiC drift . Yet, comparing different lead area fraction retrievals remains challenging because of different definitions of leads, e.g., open leads versus leads covered by thin ice or even frost flowers, and the difference in methods used on different scales (von Albedyll et al., 2023). ...

Lead fractions from SAR-derived sea ice divergence during MOSAiC

... This transition was confirmed in the preferred lead orientation and ice motion. A similar variation of LF from below 1% to 4% was found in TPD in 2019-2020 winter using airborne surface temperature acquired during MOSAiC and attributed to sea ice dynamic and thermodynamics with ice growth (Thielke et al., 2023). ...

Spatio-temporal variability of small-scale leads based on helicopter winter sea ice surface temperatures

... Classifications for that acquisitions are derived and provided by the German Aerospace Center (DLR). The resolution of these classifications is four times lower than the resolution of the respective Sentinel 1 acquisitions, which is 40 m (Murashkin and Frost, 2021). This enables a routing algorithm to consider small features with a size of 160 m, for example small leads. ...

Arctic Sea Ice Mapping using Sentinel-1 SAR scenes with a Convolutional Neural Network
  • Citing Conference Paper
  • July 2021

... Considering the potential of lead growth, we chose the Beaufort Sea, located in northwestern Canada, as our study area, which is one of the most active Arctic lead areas [25]. Sentinel-1 dual-polarized, HH and HV, SAR images in extra-wide-swath mode at medium resolution are used as data sources. ...

Sea Ice Leads Detected From Sentinel-1 SAR Images
  • Citing Conference Paper
  • July 2019

... The sea ice concentration data was provided by the University of Bremen data archive, with 1-km space resolution (seaice.uni-bremen.de, Ludwig et al., 2019Ludwig et al., , 2020. Sea ice charts from the Canada Ice Center were also used (www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/servi ...

The 2018 North Greenland polynya observed by a newly introduced merged optical and passive microwave sea-ice concentration dataset

... Due to an anomalous drift pattern in the central Arctic during spring and summer 2018 (Moore et al., 2018;Ludwig et al., 2019), the station only moved 170 km away from its initial deployment location during the 5 months of deployment. Simultaneously, the AO18 expedition of the Swedish icebreaker Oden was in the same region between 13 August and 15 September 2018, to perform a 4 weeks drift station close to the geographic North Pole. ...

Observation of the 2018 North Greenland polynya with a new merged optical and passive microwave sea ice concentration dataset

The Cryosphere Discussions

... SAR offers both high spatial resolution and large coverage, making it a unique microwave sensor for monitoring sea ice in polar regions [10]. Spaceborne high-resolution SAR imagery has been widely used for sea ice classification [11]- [14], lead detection [15]- [16], and ice floe segmentation [17]. ...

Method for detection of leads from Sentinel-1 SAR images

Annals of Glaciology