Dieter Rommel’s research while affiliated with Ulm University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Figure 1. The mean disfluency rate (plus/minus one standard error) per age group. Age groups and number of subjects are indicated along the abscissa. Mean values and standard errors are represented by individual bars  
Figure 2. Histogram showing the mean length of PW (number of words) for the two segmentation methods in German (the left and middle bar) and the standard English method (the bar on the right). Variability is indicated by standard error bars  
Figure 3. (a) Percentage of disfluencies for pre and post content function words. (b) Content word disfluencies in PWs across age groups. Both graphs have an adjusted stuttering rate which is the percentage disfluencies once overall individual stuttering rate is controlled for  
Figure 4.  
Figure 5. The position of the word within a given PW is indicated along the x-axis. Values along the y-axis represent percentage disfluency rate which has been adjusted by taking individual disfluency rates as a covariate across age groups. The two lines indicate different word types with content words being represented by the solid line and function words by the dashed line (see legend). Standard error bars indicate variability around each mean  

+2

Stuttering on function and content words across age groups of German speakers who stutter
  • Article
  • Full-text available

August 2004

·

446 Reads

·

39 Citations

Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders

·

·

James Au-Yeung

·

Dieter Rommel

Recent research into stuttering in English has shown that function word disfluency decreases with age whereas content words disfluency increases. Also function words that precede a content word are significantly more likely to be stuttered than those that follow content words (Au-Yeung, Howell and Pilgrim, 1998; Howell, Au-Yeung and Sackin, 1999). These studies have used the concept of the phonological word as a means of investigating these phenomena. Phonological words help to determine the position of function words relative to content words and to establish the origin of the patterns of disfluency with respect to these two word classes. The current investigation analysed German speech for similar patterns. German contains many long compound nouns; on this basis, German content words are more complex than English ones. Thus, the patterns of disfluency within phonological words may differ between German and English. Results indicated three main findings. Function words that occupy an early position in a PW have higher rates of disfluency than those that occur later in a PW, this being most apparent for the youngest speakers. Second, function words that precede the content word in a PW have higher rates of disfluency than those that follow the content word. Third, young speakers exhibit high rates of disfluency on function words, but this drops off with age and, correspondingly, disfluency rate on content words increases. The patterns within phonological words may be general to German and English and can be accounted for by the EXPLAN model, assuming lexical class operates equivalently across these languages or that lexical categories contain some common characteristic that is associated with fluency across the languages.

Download

Citations (1)


... In the culmination of this work, Brown (1945) verified the predictiveness of these four linguistic features within a single dataset. Subsequent to the work of Brown and colleagues, numerous studies have confirmed the relationship between each of Brown's four features (i.e., word initial phoneme, word grammatical function, word position within a sentence, word length) and the predictability of stuttering events (e.g., Au-Yeung et al., 1998Conway & Quarrington, 1962;Danzger & Halpern, 1973;Dayalu et al., 2002;Dworzynski et al., 2004Dworzynski et al., , 2004Hahn, 1942;Howell et al., 1999;Quarrington, 1965;Sheehan, 1974;Soderberg, 1966;Taylor, 1966;Wells, 1983;Wingate, 1967Wingate, , 1979. Two prior studies investigated Brown's four features within a singular dataset of read speech from adults who stutter (Max et al., 2019;Taylor, 1966). ...

Reference:

Linguistic Features of Stuttering During Spontaneous Speech
Stuttering on function and content words across age groups of German speakers who stutter

Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders