Dennis F. Fisher’s research while affiliated with U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (4)


Modality effects and storage in sequential short-term memory
  • Article
  • Publisher preview available

March 1971

·

9 Reads

·

4 Citations

Journal of Experimental Psychology

Dennis F. Fisher

·

Robert Karsh

Notes that previous studies have not been effective in minimizing the temporal dependencies which have favored auditory over visual performance in short-term memory. 2 experiments were conducted using the keeping-track task which has been shown to place importance upon spatial relationships during encoding and storage. Exp. I, with 18 undergraduates, resulted in fewer errors being made during the auditory presentations, suggesting the possibility of differences in the encoding task for each mode. Exp. 2, with 18 undergraduates, attempted to equate the encoding tasks and resulted in the same level of performance for each mode. Results are interpreted as giving support to the "spatial window" model. Both modes were found to be capable of spatial encoding and storage. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

View access options

Visual Confusion Matrices: Fact or Artifact?

February 1969

·

14 Reads

·

42 Citations

: Perceptual confusion matrices were generated with the use of tachistoscopic exposure of upper case letters of the English alphabet at each of two exposure durations. The resulting matrices were compared with those generated by Hodge and Pew and Gardner. Little correspondence was noted between the pattern of confusions obtained in each study. Thus, there was no evidence for the common assumption that a basic 'pattern of confusions' exists between letters of the alphabet. Implications for studies of short-term memory were discussed.



BRIEF VISUAL MEMORY AS A FUNCTION OF VISUAL AND ACOUSTIC CONFUSABILITY.

January 1967

·

6 Reads

·

4 Citations

ATTEMPTED TO DETERMINE IF FORGETTING IN VERY SHORT-TERM VISUAL MEMORY IS DUE TO DECAY OR INTERFERENCE. ACOUSTIC CONFUSABILITY, WHICH IMPAIRS SHORT-TERM MEMORY FOR VEBAL MATERIALS, FAILED TO AFFECT PERFORMANCE IN A BRIEF VISUAL MEMORY TASK WHICH EMPLOYED VEBAL MATERIALS BUT PREVENTED COVERT REHEARSAL. VISUAL CONFUSABILITY, HOWEVER, IMPAIRED BOTH PERCEPTUAL PERFORMANCE AND MEMORY PERFORMANCE AT A VERY SHORT DELAY, BUT HAD NO EFFECT AT THE LONGEST DELAY INTERVAL (1 SEC.). THESE RESULTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH SPERLING'S NOTION OF A BRIEF PREPERCEPTUAL STORAGE SYSTEM, AND WITH A DECAY INTERPRETATION OF VEY SHORT-TERM VISUAL MEMORY. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Citations (4)


... ( 3 ) Phonemic encoding may not be an obligatory process since phonemic errors were minimal after considerable practice and when a response could be immediately made. In a similar partial report task, Glucksberg, Fisher, and Monty (1967) found that letters of high acoustic confusability were not more confusable or difficult to recall than letters of high visual confusability. ...

Reference:

Rehearsal and Recoding of Information from Visual Sensory-Memory
BRIEF VISUAL MEMORY AS A FUNCTION OF VISUAL AND ACOUSTIC CONFUSABILITY.
  • Citing Article
  • January 1967

... Two other possible reasons for why subjects did not construct a visual image equivalent to that elicited by simultaneous presentation are that constructing an image might be too effortful or that the task of perceiving each new item might interfere with a visual image of the previous items. Providing some evidence for the latter possibility is Fisher and Karsh's (1971) finding that an auditory presentation was better than a visual sequential presentation in performing a task involving spatial processing of the stimuli. ...

Modality effects and storage in sequential short-term memory

Journal of Experimental Psychology

... Symbols were chosen for one stimulus dimension because they are of a class that does not possess a natural order, as compared with numbers. Monty, Fisher, & Karsh (1967) suggest that use of a class of stimuli possessing sequential order (such as numbers or letters of the alphabet) as a coding dimension is likely to lead to greater proficiency in keeping-track performance than use of stimuli not possessing such an order. ...

Stimulus Characteristics and Spatial Encoding in Sequential Short-Term Memory
  • Citing Article
  • February 1967

... In addition, 16% of the participants in Brezina (2019) had a native language that used a Cyrillic script other than Russian. Thus, for generating visually similar controls in future studies on parafoveal processing in Russian, previously collected letter similarity rates (Brezina, 2019;Korshunov, 2012) might be inappropriate (Fisher et al., 1969;Geyer, 1977). ...

Visual Confusion Matrices: Fact or Artifact?
  • Citing Article
  • February 1969