David Mark’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Going Dirty: The Art of Negative Campaigning
  • Book

January 2009

·

23 Reads

·

92 Citations

David Mark

Going Dirty is a history of negative campaigning in American politics and an examination of how candidates and political consultants have employed this often-controversial technique. The book includes case studies on notable races throughout the television era in which new negative campaign strategies were introduced, or existing tactics were refined and amplified upon. Strategies have included labeling opponents from non-traditional political backgrounds as dumb or lightweight, an approach that got upended when a veteran actor and rookie candidate named Ronald Reagan won the California governorship in 1966, setting him on a path to the White House. The negative tone of campaigns has also been ratcheted up dramatically since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001: Campaign commercials now routinely run pictures of international villains and suggest, sometimes overtly, at other times more subtly, that political opponents are less than resolute in prosecuting the war on terror. The book also outlines a series of races in which negative campaigning has backfired, because the charges were not credible or the candidate on the attack did not understand the political sentiments of the local electorate they were trying to persuade. The effect of newer technologies on negative campaigning is also examined, including blogs and Web video, in addition to tried and true methods like direct mail.

Citations (1)


... By doing so, the study fills an important research gap and brings more nuance to our understanding of the strategic use of prospective threats in political campaigning. As such, it contributes to two strands of scholarship: the literature on the use of fear in political campaigning (Mark 2007;Mattes and Redlawsk 2015;Nai 2021;Ventsel et al. 2021;Walton 2000) and the literature on the discourses produced during the Brexit referendum campaign (Rone 2021;Koller et al. 2019;Zappettini and Krzyżanowski 2021). ...

Reference:

Scaring for the greater good? Discursive construction of fear appeals in the brexit referendum campaign
Going Dirty: The Art of Negative Campaigning
  • Citing Book
  • January 2009