David Maerz’s research while affiliated with Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and other places

Objective: The American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period. When surgeries are scheduled by surgeons and their staff at our large institution a presumed ASA-PS is chosen. This is because our institution (and, anecdotally, others in our hospital system and elsewhere), recognizing the relationship between higher ASA-PS and poorer postoperative outcomes, requires all patients with higher ASA-PS levels (≥3) to undergo enhanced preoperative workup. The patients may not, however, necessarily be seen in the anesthesia clinic prior to surgery. As a result, patients are assigned a presumed ASA-PS by a non-anesthesia provider (e.g., surgeons and physician extenders) that may not reflect the ASA-PS chosen by the anesthesiologist on the day of surgery. Errors in the accuracy of the ASA-PS prior to surgery lead to unnecessary and costly preoperative testing, delays in operative procedures, and potential case cancellations. Our study aimed to determine whether there are significant differences in the assignment of ASA-PS by non-anesthesia providers when compared to anesthesia providers. Design: We administered an IRB-approved survey asking the ASA-PS of 20 hypothetical case vignettes to 229 clinicians in various departments. Responses by non-anesthesia providers were compared to the consensus of the department of anesthesiology. Setting: Faculty office spaces and conferences. Patients: No patients, physicians only. Interventions: Survey administration. Measurements: ASA-PS scores acquired from surveys. Main results: Residents and faculty in the department of anesthesiology demonstrated no statistical difference in the median ASA score in 19/20 case scenarios. All other departments were statistically different when compared to the department of anesthesiology (p<0.05). The probability of a department either over- or under-rating the ASA-PS was calculated, and is summarized in Fig. 3. All departments, except anesthesiology, had a 30-40% chance of under-rating the ASA-PS of the patients in the clinical vignettes. Conclusions: Non-anesthesia providers assign ASA-PS with significantly less accuracy than do anesthesia providers, even when adjusted for multiple comparisons. Surgical and procedural departments were found to consistently under-rate the ASA-PS of patients in our clinical vignettes.

With the ever-increasing popularity of robotic–assisted laparoscopic surgery over the past decades, the literature reporting complications distant from the surgical site involving the use of this technology has also grown. The goal of this non-systematic review is to summarise these reports with a systems-based presentation of these complications. The most commonly observed complications were related to the peripheral nervous system and the most devastating occurring in cardiac and ophthalmic systems. There were no reports of patient complications directly related to the robot itself. While several of the reported complications are not unique to robotic surgery, they are included to maintain awareness of their possibility. The limitation of surgical time, judicious fluid administration, and constant vigilance of patient positioning are all recommended as possible preventative measures.

Antihistamines are a broad class of drugs, which can be further subdivided by their receptor specificity (H1 vs H2) and whether they cross the blood–brain barrier (first generation) or remain in the periphery (second generation). This chapter will focus on the first-generation H 1 antagonists commonly used in clinical practice for purposes of sedation, nauseal and vomiting prophylaxis, and roles in pain management.