January 1993
·
11 Reads
·
2 Citations
Law & Society Review
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
January 1993
·
11 Reads
·
2 Citations
Law & Society Review
November 1992
·
9 Reads
·
25 Citations
Journal of Public Health Policy
January 1992
·
12 Reads
·
1 Citation
California Law Review
How can we improve auto safety? Has federal legislation helped? Has Ralph Nader helped? What about tort law? These matters are explored thorugh a review of Mashaw and Harfst's book "The Struggle for Auto Safety."
December 1991
·
20 Reads
·
42 Citations
Political Science Quarterly
December 1991
·
3 Reads
·
2 Citations
Administrative Science Quarterly
April 1991
·
3 Reads
·
9 Citations
Columbia Law Review
... 48,49 These gains are particularly important given the limited degree of seat belt use and public skepticism about seat belt laws during the 1970s and 1980s. 50 As Schmid et al summarized, "It is unreasonable to expect large proportions of the population to make individual behavior changes that are discouraged by the environment and existing social norms." 1 ...
April 1991
Columbia Law Review
... As the harmonization of the changing cultural context and automakers' claims in support of cost-benefit analysis increased, this growing cultural consonance allowed such claims to resonate more positively with Congress, public opinion, and the courts. In this way, cost-benefit analysis attained broad acceptance, serving to effectively transform the law's original meaning-from ensuring every citizen's moral right to safety to a pragmatic calculation of the costs and benefits associated with safety features (Mashaw and Harfst 1990). ...
November 1992
Journal of Public Health Policy
... Today's market for automobiles contains many regulations and constraints for manufacturers. These current legal restrictions did not arise accidentally: in the United States, they are partially the result of activism to produce the "political and media forces necessary to achieve the goals of the 1966 motor vehicle safety law" (Nader, 1991). To generate similar forces for better user experiences requires a reconsideration of current practice. ...
December 1991
Political Science Quarterly