David Feijoo’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Total resin yield (kg per tree) through conventional resin tapping in the a 2020 and b 2021 campaigns as a function of the stimulant treatment used (CTR: Control, CUN: Cunningham, SAL: Asacif and ZET: Zeta) and the frequency between consecutive grooves (every two and three weeks). Note that different treatments were tested in each campaign. Least square means ± SE are shown. Different letters within each campaign
Relationships between resin production in the 2020 and the 2021 campaigns using a conventional resin tapping and b micro-tapping procedures. Each point represents the least square mean (as derived from the corresponding mixed models) for each of the four stimulant treatments (CTR, CUN, SAL, ZET) in each of the four test sites (those with two assessed resin tapping campaigns: CULL, MOND, PANT with P. pinaster and PANT with P. radiata). Coefficients of determination (R²), associated probability values (P) and sample sizes of the regression analyses (N) are shown
Resin production (in kg per tree) along the tapping season for the a 2020 and b 2021 campaigns using conventional resin tapping procedures. In a and b, data from biweekly grooves using the four stimulant treatments (CTR, CUN, SAL and ZET) are shown. Measurements were done approximately every 1.5 months. Different letters within each assessment date denote significant (P < 0.05) differences among treatments. For the 2021 campaign, panels b1, b2 and b3 show the differences in temporal resin production between grooves applied every 2 and 3 weeks for each stimulant paste (b1 CUN, b2 SAL, b3 ZET). For each assessment date, significant differences (P < 0.05) between the two tested frequencies are indicated with an asterisk. Least square means as derived from the repeated measures mixed models are shown
Resin flow through micro-tapping (in g per tree) in the a 2020 and b 2021 campaigns as a function of the stimulant treatment used (CTR: Control, CUN: Cunningham, SAL: Asacif and ZET: Zeta). Least square means ± SE of accumulated resin flow 24 and 30 days after the initial wound are shown for the 2020 and 2021 campaigns, respectively. Different letters within each campaign denote significant differences (P < 0.05)
Resin flow (in g per tree) at different days since wounding in the a 2020 and b 2021 micro-tapping campaigns as a function of the stimulant treatment used (CTR: Control, CUN: Cunningham, SAL: Asacif and ZET: Zeta). Least square means derived from the repeated measures mixed models are shown

+1

Resin tapping of Atlantic pine forests: towards an optimized use of stimulant pastes over the season
  • Article
  • Full-text available

April 2024

·

152 Reads

·

5 Citations

European Journal of Forest Research

·

Roberto Touza

·

David Feijoo

·

[...]

·

Pine resin is a valuable non-wood forest product with an increasing interest in multiple industrial sectors. Resin-tapping activities also provide valuable ecosystem services in timber-oriented and highly productive pine forest of Atlantic regions, where little previous experience in resin-tapping is available. The objectives of this study were to determine the efficiency of different stimulant pastes and its variation with pine species, site conditions, seasonality and frequency of tapping interventions. We conducted parallel experiments using both conventional and micro-tapping techniques in mature pine stands in NW Spain. We tested four stimulants (control and Zeta, Cunningham and Salicylic pastes) and two groove frequencies (every 2 or 3 weeks). All stimulant pastes significantly increased resin yield compared to the control, being resin stimulation highly consistent across years, sites and species. In conventional resin tapping, resin yield was maximized with the Cunningham and Salicylic pastes while in micro-tapping Salicylic was the most outstanding stimulant treatment. According to the rapid decay of resin flow after wounding, total resin yield decreased with more spaced grooves. However, the reduction was low, and the global efficiency of the tapping operations are likely maximized with grooves applied every three weeks, which would allow increasing the number of tapped trees. Micro-tapping techniques were valuable for screening stimulant pastes and anticipating variation among sites in resin production. Altogether, the Salicylic paste is recommended, especially at the beginning of the resin campaign, when the effect of the pastes was maximized, and if tapping is conducted using closed atmospheres and containers.

Download

Citations (1)


... Due to safety concerns, the first solid pastes combined sulfuric acid with kaolinite (Al 2 Si 2 O 5 (OH) 4 ) and calcium chloride (CaCl 2 ), later replaced by gypsum [10]. This traditional paste has been shown to increase the resin flow by prolonging wound activity and remains widely used, although concerns regarding their long-term impact on tree health, workplace safety, and unwanted chemical residues persist [11]. ...

Reference:

Toward Safer Resin Tapping: Assessing Alternative Chemical Stimulants for Pinus pinaster
Resin tapping of Atlantic pine forests: towards an optimized use of stimulant pastes over the season

European Journal of Forest Research