Dario Floreano’s research while affiliated with Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (589)


Comparison of the maximum jumping heights (h) versus body length (BL) of inedible jumpers in[12–27] and this work. Materials used to store the elastic energy were distinguished with different marker colors (blue: metal; orange: soft elastomers; green: edible materials proposed in this work). Jumpers indicated by black circles rely on external stimuli to trigger jumping.[12–18] Tethered jumpers (hollow markers) are physically connected to an external power source (e.g., pump, battery) to store and release elastic energy.[19–22,27]
Mechanical properties of our gelatin mixtures measured by tensile test (refer Figure S1, Supporting Information). a): Young's modulus (E) and the square of tensile strength (σTS²) of inedible materials used for jumping applications[12,16,20,23,24,27,32–36] and our gelatin mixture (Gel: gelatin, Gly: glycerol, Wat: water, Gen: genipin, PVA: polyvinyl alcohol). The break‐off lines correspond to σTS²/E, and their magnitudes increase toward the bottom‐right corner, implying a greater capability of storing elastic energy. b‐d): The material properties of gelatin mixtures (Gel/Gly/Wat/PVA/Gen) during ten days stored at room temperature. The mass ratio of Gel, Gly, Wat, and Gen was fixed as 1:2.5:2.5:0.01, while five different Gel:PVA mass ratios (1:0, 1:0.05, 1:0.10, 1:0.15, and 1:0.20) were tested (b: Young's modulus, c: tensile strength, d: elongation at break). e): σTS²/E of our gelatin mixtures crosslinked with genipin and five Gelatin:PVA ratios are compared with σTS²/E of engineering materials obtained from.[³⁷] f): The gelatin specimen for viscoelasticity characterization was modelled as two Maxwell elements (η1 and E1) and a parallel spring (E0)[⁴⁷] where η1, E1, and E0 are parameters that need to be tuned experimentally. Gel, Gly, Wat, PVA, and Gen was set to 1:2.5:2.5:0.05:0.01, as it showed the largest σTS²/E. g): Viscoelastic time constant τ of four gelatin mixtures at different mechanical strain ɛ. A material with large τ displays less stress relaxation under strain. In the case of Gel:Gly:Wat = 1:1:3, the sample was ruptured when ɛ > 0.5, and therefore, it was not considered.
Model‐based design of a gelatin shell to achieve the highest jump. a): geometrical parameters for a flexible beam (yellow beam: the cross section of a spherical shell at rest, blue beam: the cross section of an everted shell) redrawn from[⁵⁷] where L, t, wh, R, α are respectively the lateral size, thickness, width into the page, radius, and angular opening of the shell. Point force F and the shell perimeter La are referred in Note S1 (Supporting Information) to solve the FvK model. b): maximum jumping height (hmax) calculated from the model with respect to 50° ≤ α ≤ 90°, 3 mm ≤ t ≤ 10 mm, and 20 mm ≤ L ≤ 50 mm. Left panel: L is fixed as 40 mm, because changing L into different values exhibited the same result (Figure S7, Supporting Information). Right panel: α is fixed as 90°, where the markers A–E correspond to shell designs yielding maximum jumping height of 0.36 m.
Jumping height measurements of edible jumpers in different sizes and their characterization. a): The maximum jumping height (hmax) for the range of L and t by manually everting and releasing edible jumpers on the next day of manufacturing (Day 2), where hmax = 361 mm was the highest jump. Model‐predicted results A‐E (Figure 3b) are compared only on Day 2 due to the limited scalability of the model on Day 4 and Day 6. b): hmax on Day 4. c): hmax on Day 6. Note that the locations of each box plot (in terms of L and t) were shifted from Day 2 to Day 6 due to the dimensional change caused by volumetric shrinkage (Figure S9, Supporting Information). d): Shell characteristic parameter λD=[12(1−ν2)](1/4)R/tα${{\lambda }_D} = {{[ {12( {1\ - \ {{\nu }^2}} )} ]}^{( {1/4} )}}\sqrt {R/t} \alpha $[⁵⁷] of edible jumpers versus R/t where ν is a Poisson ratio, R = 0.5L, and α = 90°. Note that λD < 5 ensured monostability of jumpers. The yellow markers stand for edible jumpers (R/t ≈ 4) that were pseudo‐bistable for more than 3 days in a row when 5.4 < λD < 5.52. e): Comparison of hmax obtained from FvK‐based model, and experiment (data from Day 2). The size of purple circular markers is proportional to L. Curve fittings of experiment data was done in a least‐square manner.
The application of edible jumpers to off‐the‐shelf pet food. a): Commercially available pet foods are assembled with three selected edible jumpers (Type A: L = 38.3 mm, t = 8.6 mm, Type B: L = 37.3 mm, t = 4.8 mm, Type C: L = 19.2 mm, t = 4.4 mm). b): The change of jump heights over four days by considering the pet food as a payload with a mass of mp, where Mo and P‐Bi mean monostable and pseudo‐bistable, respectively. c): the jumping of monostable Type A, where t0 is a reference time. d): The jumping of Type B, which was pseudo‐bistable; there was 1 s of time delay between the moment of shell eversion (at t0 + 0.72 s) and the onset of jumping (at t0 + 1.7 s). e): The jumping of Type C (pseudo‐bistable), where t0 corresponds to the moment when hands were out of camera angle after the shell eversion. Captured images showing the manual shell eversion of Type C are not displayed.

+1

Edible Jumpers Powered by Shell Snapping
  • Article
  • Full-text available

February 2025

·

53 Reads

·

Juliette Hars

·

Dario Floreano

Food animation is gaining increasing attention for the ability to reduce waste and increase attractiveness in animals and humans. Although several examples of food animation methods have been recently described, the speed and range of motion are still limited. Here a method is described to design and manufacture small edible jumpers powered by rapid release of elastic energy through shell snapping. The jumping actuators are made of gelatin crosslinked with genipin and polyvinyl alcohol, ensuring resilience to stress during shell eversion. The shape and size of the shells are modeled and optimized for maximum jumping height resulting in jumpers with a diameter of 47 mm that can reach a jumping height of 361 mm. The edible jumpers can be loaded with additional nutritional components encapsulated by humidity‐sensitive latches for automatic release. To showcase potential uses of such edible jumpers, a jumping food pellet for pets and an animated dessert for humans are described.

Download

Fig. 2. Fabrication of the FJ VS catheter. (A) Ultrathin PlA fibers are produced by winding machine i, which pulls the melted PlA filament through its spinning spool. (B) Fiber bundles with specific numbers of fibers are prepared on winding machine ii. (C) Silicone sleeves are fabricated by dipping steel rods (Φ2 mm) in the freshly mixed silicone fluid and then by curing them on the curing stand. (D) Fabrication of the second FJ segment. the silicone sleeve is first inserted into the right side of the PtFe tube, followed by the insertion of the copper fibers and the working and vacuum channels [(d), a]. Silicone glue is then applied at the right tip to fix the copper fibers [(d), b], followed by the immediate insertion of the magnet and the supporting cF rod [(d), c]. extra silicone glue is then applied to seal the second segment [(d), d]. (E) Fabrication of the first FJ segment. the PlA fiber bundle is first inserted into the silicone sleeve [(e), a]. the halfway first segment is inserted onto the tip of the second segment along the working channel. the silicone sleeve is then rubbed leftward and fixed at the tip of the second segment with silicone glue [(e), b]. the right end of the PlA fibers is fixed with silicone glue [(e), c], followed by the immediate insertion of the magnet and sealing with extra silicone glue [(e), d].
Fig. 4. Single-segment catheter tests with the RMN system. (A) catheter (100% PlA fibers of Ø50 μm, 45% filling rate) in the stiff state tested under increasing MFd with a fixed direction. the direction of the magnetic field is perpendicular to the initial orientation of the catheter body, generating maximum bending moments for the assessment of catheter rigidity. (B) Same catheter in the soft state tested under a fixed MFd with changing direction from 0 to 150°. (C) Bending results of the catheters with 100% PlA and 100% copper fibers from tests (A) and (B). the colored dots highlight the small deflections of the catheters in the stiff state using their corresponding MFds. (D) cyclic bending test result of the catheter with 100% PlA fibers to reveal its bending hysteresis.
Fig. 5. Two-segment catheter tests with the RMN system. (A) Selective manipulation of the two catheter segments to form a multi-curvature body. the initial state of the catheter is straight [(A), a]. the first segment is softened and manipulated, with the stiffened second segment staying still, in a 40-mt MFd magnetic field [(A), b]. the second segment is softened and manipulated, with the stiffened first segment staying straight, in an 80-mt MFd magnetic field [(A), c]. Following [(A), d], the second segment is stiffened, and the first segment is softened for manipulation to form a multi-curvature body in a 40-mt MFd magnetic field. (B and C) catheter manipulation in a human heart phantom with the stiffened second segment supporting the manipulation of the first segment in the left ventricle (front view) (B) and left atrium (top view) (c). FJc, FJ catheter.
Instant variable stiffness in cardiovascular catheters based on fiber jamming

February 2025

·

92 Reads

Science Advances

Yi Sun

·

·

Etienne H. Hofstetter

·

[...]

·

Dario Floreano

Variable stiffness (VS) has revolutionized miniature surgical instruments, including cardiovascular catheters for minimally invasive surgeries (MISs), enabling advanced capabilities in stiffness modulation and multi-curvature bending. However, existing VS catheters with phase-changing materials are slow in softening and stiffening rates (≈90 s), which can lead to substantial increase in surgery duration. To address the slow stiffness change, we propose a VS catheter based on fiber jamming (FJ) that achieves instant stiffness changes (≤300 ms), enabling seamless catheter operations without delays. Moreover, our catheter, incorporating hundreds of ultrathin fibers into a slender 2.3-mm catheter body, achieves up to 6.5-fold stiffness changes. With adequate stiffness change, our two-segment catheter achieves complex bending profiles within seconds. In addition, the FJ-based design does not require electric currents or heating inside the human body, minimizing patient risks. This FJ-based VS catheter, with instantaneous response, adequate stiffness change, and enhanced safety, can potentially establish benchmarks in MIS, allowing medical practitioners to effectively address formidable diseases.


First-Person View Interfaces for Teleoperation of Aerial Swarms

January 2025

IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

Aerial swarms can substantially improve the effectiveness of drones in applications such as inspection, monitoring, and search for rescue. This is especially true when those swarms are made of several individual drones that use local sensing and coordination rules to achieve collective motion. Despite recent progress in swarm autonomy, human control and decision-making are still critical for missions where lives are at risk or human cognitive skills are required. However, first-person-view (FPV) teleoperation systems require one or more human operators per drone, limiting the scalability of these systems to swarms. This work investigates the performance, preference, and behaviour of pilots using different FPV interfaces for teleoperation of aerial swarms. Interfaces with single and multiple perspectives were experimentally studied with humans piloting a simulated aerial swarm through an obstacle course. Participants were found to prefer and perform better with views from the back of the swarm, while views from the front caused users to fly faster but resulted in more crashes. Presenting users with multiple views at once resulted in a slower completion time, and users were found to focus on the largest view, regardless of its perspective within the swarm.


Avian-inspired robot design and capabilities
a, RAVEN, with a pair of legs, a pair of fixed wings and a V-tail. RAVEN can deflect the wing ailerons and the V-tail to control flight. Scale bar, 10 cm. b, Similar to birds, RAVEN is capable of both terrestrial and aerial locomotion and active ground-to-air transition. c, When flying is not possible, the bipedal legs enable RAVEN to walk on the ground, hop to clear a gap, jump over an obstacle and jump to take-off for flight. d, The hip and ankle joints of the leg mechanism are driven by two electromagnetic motors, and the toe joint of the foot is passively compliant with an embedded torsional spring. e, The ankle joint also has an embedded torsional spring, allowing storage and release of elastic energy during ankle flexion and extension, respectively. Scale bar, 5 cm. Images in b adapted from Adobe Stock (https://stock.adobe.com).
Take-off experiments
a, RAVEN can jump to take off and can maintain stable level flight. b–d, Take-off trajectories (b), speeds (c) and energy inputs (d) of four different take-off strategies: jumping take-off (blue), jumping only (red), falling take-off (yellow) and standing take-off (green). The solid line and shaded region represent the mean value and standard deviation, respectively, from five trials of each take-off strategy. The vertical dashed lines indicate the time of take-off. Jumping take-off, falling take-off and standing take-off are shown in a 1-s period, and jumping ends at 0.62 s because the robot hit the ground. e, Average acceleration of the robot during the accelerating period before take-off (vertical dashed lines in b–d) obtained by taking derivative of speed in c. f, Total energy output is the sum of kinetic energy and potential energy at take-off. g, Efficiency is the ratio between the energy output and the energy input at take-off. The bars in e–g are mean and standard deviation (n = 5).
Source Data
Terrestrial locomotion
a–c, RAVEN is able to walk continuously at a speed of 0.23 m s⁻¹ (a), hop over an 11.5-cm gap (b) and clear a vertical obstacle of 26 cm by jumping (c). The dashed lines represent the COM trajectories. d–f, Trajectories (d), horizontal velocities (e) and energy inputs (f) of the three terrestrial locomotion modes. The solid line and shaded region are the mean and standard deviation (n = 5 trials) for each locomotion mode. g,h, The Froude numbers (g) and COTs (h) of selected legged and multimodal aerial robots (see ‘COT and Froude number calculation’ in Methods). Robots capable of both terrestrial and aerial locomotion are shown in blue and robots that operate only on the ground are highlighted in red. This work is marked with stars. The yellow and green triangles are Froude numbers of birds during walking and running, respectively, from ref. ⁴¹. Filled markers in h indicate that only actuation energy is used for the COT calculation. The yellow solid and dashed lines in h are the net COT trends of animals walking and running, respectively, from ref. ³⁶. The yellow dash-dotted line is the COT of animals in general from ref. ⁴². The green dash-dotted line is the net COT trend of running ground birds (galliformes) from ref. ³⁵.
Source Data
Leg mass budget of birds and selected multimodal aerial robots
a, Total leg mass (for two legs) relative to total body mass among birds and multimodal robots. Circles are for birds, and diamonds are for aerial and terrestrial locomotion robots. RAVEN is highlighted with the filled star. The black solid line represents the trend line of the relationship between the total leg mass to total body mass in birds (see ‘Compilation of bird data’ in Methods). The dashed line is the line of isometry. Images of birds and robots are not drawn to scale. b, Total leg mass as a percentage of body mass. Bird groupings in b are based on ref. ⁴³. Photographs of birds in a are adapted from Adobe Stock (https://stock.adobe.com). Robot images in a are adapted with permission from: LEONARDO, ref. ³, AAAS; SNAG, ref. ⁴, AAAS; Stanford jumpglider, ref. ¹⁵, IOP Science; EPFL jumpglider, ref. ¹⁶, IOP Science; MultiMo-Bat, ref. ¹⁹, Sage; MALV II, ref. ³², Elsevier; DALER, ref. ³³, IOP Science; Jump-flapper ref. ⁴⁴, IOP Science.
Source Data
Fast ground-to-air transition with avian-inspired multifunctional legs

December 2024

·

205 Reads

·

2 Citations

Nature

Most birds can navigate seamlessly between aerial and terrestrial environments. Whereas the forelimbs evolved into wings primarily for flight, the hindlimbs serve diverse functions such as walking, hopping and leaping, and jumping take-off for transitions into flight¹. These capabilities have inspired engineers to aim for similar multimodality in aerial robots, expanding their range of applications across diverse environments. However, challenges remain in reproducing multimodal locomotion, across gaits with distinct kinematics and propulsive characteristics, such as walking and jumping, while preserving lightweight mass for flight. This trade-off between mechanical complexity and versatility² limits most existing aerial robots to only one additional locomotor mode3, 4–5. Here we overcome the complexity–versatility trade-off with RAVEN (Robotic Avian-inspired Vehicle for multiple ENvironments), which uses its bird-inspired multifunctional legs to jump rapidly into flight, walk on the ground, and hop over obstacles and gaps similar to the multimodal locomotion of birds. We show that jumping for take-off contributes substantially to the initial flight take-off speed6, 7, 8–9 and, remarkably, that it is more energy efficient than taking off without the jump. Our analysis suggests an important trade-off in mass distribution between legs and body among birds adapted for different locomotor strategies, with greater investment in leg mass among terrestrial birds with multimodal gait demands. Multifunctional robot legs expand the opportunities to deploy traditional fixed-wing aircraft in complex terrains through autonomous take-offs and multimodal gaits.


Fig. 1| Avian-inspired robot design and capabilities. a, RAVEN with a pair of legs, a pair of fixed wings, and a V-tail. RAVEN can deflect the wing ailerons and the V-tail to control flight. Scale bar, 10 cm. b, Similar to birds, RAVEN is capable of both terrestrial and aerial locomotion and active ground-to-air transition. c, When flying is not possible, the bipedal legs enable RAVEN to walk on the ground, hop to clear a gap, jump over an obstacle, and jump to take-off for flight. d, The hip and ankle joints of the leg mechanism are driven by two electromagnetic motors, and the toe joint of the foot is passively compliant with an embedded torsional spring. e, The ankle joint also has an embedded torsional spring, allowing storage and release of elastic energy during ankle flexion and extension, respectively. Scale bar, 5 cm.
Fig. 2| Take-off experiments. a, RAVEN can jump to take off and can maintain stable level flight. b-d, Takeoff trajectories (b), speeds (c), and energy inputs (d) of four different take-off strategies: Jumping take-off (blue), jumping only (red), falling take-off (yellow), and standing take-off (green). Solid line and shaded region represent the mean value and standard deviation, respectively, from five trials of each take-off strategy. The vertical dashed lines indicate the time of take-off. Jumping take-off, falling take-off, and standing take-off are shown in one-second period, and jumping ends at 0.62 s because the robot hit the ground. e, Average acceleration of the robot during the accelerating period before take-off (vertical dashed lines in b-d) obtained by taking derivative of speed in c. f, Total energy output is the sum of kinetic energy and potential energy at take-off. g, Efficiency is the ratio between the energy output and the energy input at take-off.
Fast ground-to-air transition with avian-inspired multifunctional legs

December 2024

·

507 Reads

Most birds can navigate seamlessly between aerial and terrestrial environments. Whereas the forelimbs evolved into wings primarily for flight, the hindlimbs serve diverse functions such as walking, hopping, and leaping, and jumping take-off for transitions into flight. These capabilities have inspired engineers to aim for similar multi-modality in aerial robots, expanding their range of applications across diverse environments. However, challenges remain in reproducing multi-modal locomotion, across gaits with distinct kinematics and propulsive characteristics, such as walking and jumping, while preserving lightweight mass for flight. This tradeoff between mechanical complexity and versatility limits most existing aerial robots to only one additional locomotor mode. Here, we overcome the complexity-versatility tradeoff with RAVEN (Robotic Avian-inspired Vehicle for multiple ENvironments), which uses its bird-inspired multi-functional legs to jump rapidly into flight, walk on ground and hop over obstacles and gaps similar to the multi-modal locomotion of birds. We show that jumping for take-off contributes substantially to initial flight take-off speed and, remarkably, that it is more energy-efficient than solely propeller-based take-off. Our analysis suggests an important tradeoff in mass distribution between legs and body among birds adapted for different locomotor strategies, with greater investment in leg mass among terrestrial birds with multi-modal gait demands. Multi-functional robot legs expand opportunities to deploy traditional fixed-wing aircraft in complex terrains through autonomous take-offs and multi-modal gaits.


A twist of the tail in turning maneuvers of bird-inspired drones

November 2024

·

63 Reads

Science Robotics

A banked turn is a common flight maneuver observed in birds and aircraft. To initiate the turn, whereas traditional aircraft rely on the wing ailerons, most birds use a variety of asymmetric wing-morphing control techniques to roll their bodies and thus redirect the lift vector to the direction of the turn. Nevertheless, when searching for prey, soaring raptors execute steady banked turns without exhibiting observable wing movements apart from the tail twisting around the body axis. Although tail twisting can compensate for adverse yaw, functioning similarly to the vertical tail in aircraft, how raptors use only tail twisting to perform banked turns is still not well understood. Here, we developed and used a raptor-inspired feathered drone to find that the proximity of the tail to the wings causes asymmetric wing-induced flows over the twisted tail and thus lift asymmetry, resulting in both roll and yaw moments sufficient to coordinate banked turns. Moreover, twisting the tail induces a nose-up pitch moment that increases the angle of attack of the wings, thereby generating more lift to compensate for losses caused by the banking motion. Flight experiments confirm the effectiveness of tail twist to control not only low-speed steady banked turns but also high-speed sharp turns by means of coordinated tail twist and pitch with asymmetric wing shape morphing. These findings contribute to the understanding of avian flight behaviors that are difficult to study in controlled laboratory settings and provide effective control strategies for agile drones with morphing aerial surfaces.


Adaptive morphing of wing and tail for stable, resilient, and energy-efficient flight of avian-inspired drones

November 2024

·

128 Reads

·

4 Citations

npj Robotics

Avian-inspired drones feature morphing wing and tail surfaces, enhancing agility and adaptability in flight. Despite their large potential, realising their full capabilities remains challenging due to the lack of generalized control strategies accommodating their large degrees of freedom and cross-coupling effects between their control surfaces. Here we propose a new body-rate controller for avian-inspired drones that uses all available actuators to control the motion of the drone. The method exhibits robustness against physical perturbations, turbulent airflow, and even loss of certain actuators mid-flight. Furthermore, wing and tail morphing is leveraged to enhance energy efficiency at 8 m/s, 10 m/s, and 12 m/s using in-flight Bayesian optimization. The resulting morphing configurations yield significant gains across all three speeds of up to 11.5% compared to non-morphing configurations and display a strong resemblance to avian flight at different speeds. This research lays the groundwork for the development of autonomous avian-inspired drones that operate under diverse wind conditions, emphasizing the role of morphing in improving energy efficiency.


The rise of transient robotics

October 2024

·

60 Reads

Transient robots are robots designed to be non-long-lasting and degradable over time. This design philosophy is ideal for a wide range of applications, from environmental monitors to implantable systems. In this commentary, we explore the concept of transient robotics, identifying and discussing challenges and opportunities in transient robot design, materials, fabrication, and applications across smart food, healthcare, environmental protection, and disaster rescue.


The perching maneuver by Harris’ hawks and avian-inspired drone
a Schematic overview of a typical perching maneuver consisting of a dive phase (light blue line) and of an agile climb phase (blue line) (see also Supplementary Movie 1, adapted from ref. ²⁶); the illustrated bird shows the optimal control strategies displayed by the Harris' hawk (light brown) and by the avian-inspired drone (black/blue). b Comparison of Harris' hawks of the study²⁶ and the avian-inspired LisEagle drone¹⁷. We indicate the wing and tail sweep joints in red and list the mass, wing area, and wing span of the two.
Avian-inspired drone
a The avian-inspired drone, LisEagle, used in this work. b Illustration of its eight degrees of freedom. This study focuses on longitudinal motion, which is affected by symmetric sweeping of left and right wing, tail incidence, tail sweep, and thrust. The control of these degrees of freedom is given to the trajectory optimization method. Instead, lateral displacements induced by mechanical asymmetries of the drone feathers and actuator responses are stabilized by reactive Proportional-Derivative (PD) controllers where tail yaw correct yaw motion and asymmetric left and right wing twist correct roll motion.
Perching optimization in simulation
a Visualization of the simulation experiment constraints. The drone is initialized in a straight flight condition at a velocity (brown arrow) of 10 ms⁻¹ and varying distance from the target point (brown cross). The drone is required to reach the target point and is allowed to use up to 1 m of space downward, while its motion upwards is not restricted. The transition state is defined at the lowest point of the trajectory, where all the energy is kinetic. b Perching flight trajectories that result from the optimization algorithm with the objective of minimizing distance flown at high angle of attack²⁶. Starting points are in the range of 9–15 m, spaced in intervals of 1 m and are shown by an arrow. The climb phase is indicated by the shaded area, on the right of which, we show kinetic, potential, and dissipated energy at the target point. c Effect of a limited range of motion in wing and tail sweep on flight path and key characteristic metrics. The central panel shows the resulting flight paths, the left panel (E kinetic) displays the relative kinetic energy on impact, and the right panel (distance required) indicates the horizontal distance required for the perching maneuver (both surfaces linearly interpolated between experiments, indicated by black dots). d Drone trajectory during the climb phase in the morphological space defined by tail incidence, wing sweep, and tail sweep. The prominent 3-dimensional line shows the actuation sequence, with color change indicating time flow. The lighter lines depict the 2-dimensional projections on each parameter plane. The time scale at the bottom highlights the three distinct configurations of the drone during the climb phase. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Validation on drone
a Experimental setup consisting of a launcher accelerating the drone to the transition state to fly along the planned trajectory while being tracked by a motion-tracking system and eventually landing in a protective net for recovery. b The planned optimal trajectory, the trajectories from the 12 LisEagle flights, and the 537 Harris' Hawks flights²⁶. We align the optimal trajectory by aligning the point of impact of the Harris' Hawk with the corresponding point of the optimized drone trajectory. Beyond the impact point, each of the trajectories is shown in a faded color. c Energy ratios at impact of the simulated drone, the real drone, and Harris' hawks. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Qualitative comparison of the perching maneuver of the drone, simulation, and bird
a Perched flight trajectory of the drone. b Simulation of the optimal trajectory highlighting the three configurations of the climb phase (also shown with the same color scheme in Fig. 3d). On the top, the sequence is shown observed from a virtual camera at an angle matching the camera’s angle used to record the drone’s flight trajectory and at the bottom, from a virtual camera at an angle matching (c) the Harris' hawk flight recording²⁶. Each overlayed image in the sequence was captured 0.15 s apart.
Agile perching maneuvers in birds and morphing-wing drones

September 2024

·

374 Reads

·

3 Citations

Avian perching maneuvers are one of the most frequent and agile flight scenarios, where highly optimized flight trajectories, produced by rapid wing and tail morphing that generate high angular rates and accelerations, reduce kinetic energy at impact. While the behavioral, anatomical, and aerodynamic factors involved in these maneuvers are well described, the underlying control strategies are poorly understood. Here, we use optimal control methods on an avian-inspired drone with morphing wing and tail to test a recent hypothesis derived from perching maneuver experiments of Harris’ hawks that birds minimize the distance flown at high angles of attack to dissipate kinetic energy before impact. The resulting drone flight trajectories, morphing sequence, and kinetic energy distribution resemble those measured in birds. Furthermore, experimental manipulation of the wings that would be difficult or unethical with animals reveals the morphing factors that are critical for optimal perching maneuver performance of birds and morphing-wing drones.


Passive wing deployment and retraction in beetles and flapping microrobots

July 2024

·

424 Reads

·

11 Citations

Nature

Birds, bats and many insects can tuck their wings against their bodies when at rest and deploy them to power flight. Whereas birds and bats use well-developed pectoral and wing muscles1,2, how insects control their wing deployment and retraction remains unclear because this varies among insect species. Beetles (Coleoptera) display one of the most complex mechanisms. In rhinoceros beetles, Allomyrina dichotoma, wing deployment is initiated by complete release of the elytra and partial release of the hindwings at their bases. Subsequently, the beetle starts flapping, elevates the hindwing bases and unfolds the hindwing tips in an origami-like fashion. Although the origami-like fold has been extensively explored3–8, limited attention has been given to the hindwing base movements, which are believed to be driven by the thoracic muscles5,9–11. Here we demonstrate that rhinoceros beetles can effortlessly deploy their hindwings without necessitating muscular activity. We show that opening the elytra triggers a spring-like partial release of the hindwings from the body, allowing the clearance needed for the subsequent flapping motion that brings the hindwings into the flight position. After flight, the beetle can use the elytra to push the hindwings back into the resting position, further strengthening the hypothesis of passive deployment. We validated the hypothesis using a flapping microrobot that passively deployed its wings for stable, controlled flight and retracted them neatly upon landing, demonstrating a simple, yet effective, approach to the design of insect-like flying micromachines.


Citations (64)


... For instance, some designs replicate insects by employing two sets of flapping mechanisms and two servos, while others mimic insects with two pairs of independent wings and two rotors [8]. Additionally, various bio-inspired designs have been developed, drawing inspiration from larger birds [10], hummingbirds [13], flying squirrels [14], ladybird beetles [15], and others. To achieve high levels of biomimicry and full attitude control in the air, existing studies often involve complex designs with numerous actuators, which can lead to inefficiency in multimodal locomotion. ...

Reference:

T3: Multi-modal Tailless Triple-Flapping-Wing Robot for Efficient Aerial and Terrestrial Locomotion
Fast ground-to-air transition with avian-inspired multifunctional legs

Nature

... These capabilities have spurred growing interest in replicating morphing mechanisms in winged drones of similar scale (6)(7)(8). Numerous morphing-wing drones have been developed that exhibit improved flight stability (9,10), higher maneuverability and agility (11)(12)(13)(14)(15), and better energetic efficiency (13,16) than conventional fixed-wing drones. Despite aerodynamic benefits and shape adaptability, most existing drones display simple morphing capabilities constrained by few mechanical components and degrees of freedom. ...

Adaptive morphing of wing and tail for stable, resilient, and energy-efficient flight of avian-inspired drones

npj Robotics

... As an extreme example, perching on a vertical wall can enable the UAV to achieve a zero-distance landing roll. Biomimetic flying robots can achieve landings similar to the agility of birds, but their complex mechanical structures are more susceptible to fatigue damage [2]. Therefore, expanding the feasible flight trajectory at high AOA based on the structural performance of UAV landing gear is crucial for achieving successful perching. ...

Agile perching maneuvers in birds and morphing-wing drones

... Drawing inspiration from nature, the designs of various systems can also be optimized via the same evolutionary process. This method has proven to be successful in various systems such as antenna design [6], walking robots [7], modular robots [8] and recently on winged aircraft [9]. ...

Co-Design Optimisation of Morphing Topology and Control of Winged Drones
  • Citing Conference Paper
  • May 2024

... The hind wings of beetles can also fold and unfold when their third axillary muscle is removed [57]. This indicates that the folding and unfolding motion of the hind wings not only relies on the muscles in the chest cavity, but may also be passive unfolding. ...

Passive wing deployment and retraction in beetles and flapping microrobots

Nature

... This allows them to be modeled as a rotary-wing model during slow vertical flight and as a fixed-wing aircraft during level flight [6]. During slow vertical flight, tail-sitters can be modeled as rotary-wing UAVs, leveraging well-researched trajectory planning methods [7], [8], [9], [10]. In level flight, where the kinematics simplify that of a unicycle, guidance algorithms such as the Dubins path or analytical methods can be applied [11], [12], [13]. ...

High-Speed Motion Planning for Aerial Swarms in Unknown and Cluttered Environments
  • Citing Article
  • January 2024

IEEE Transactions on Robotics

... These qualities naturally make edible materials both biodegradable and digestible, extending their potential to novel applications such as 'edible robots'. 'Edible robots' could find potential applications in health care (by enabling precise drug delivery and in vivo monitoring of health indicators), environmental management (by reducing waste in farming and facilitating wild animal vaccination), and the promotion of healthier eating habits (by introducing new culinary experiences to consumers) (Floreano et al., 2024). ...

Towards edible robots and robotic food
  • Citing Article
  • May 2024

Nature Reviews Materials

... Productivity applications (e.g., haptic material rendering or data visualization) may also tolerate waiting time to render haptic feedback. Nonetheless, future research may improve mode-switching time by fine-tuning the rod's heating and cooling profiles 62,63 or incorporating active thermoelectric components 64 to make the proposed method more versatile and generalizable. ...

Fast‐Response Variable‐Stiffness Magnetic Catheters for Minimally Invasive Surgery

... These inks can be repurposed as sensing materials and coatings in textile-based microfluidic devices. 154,155 Additionally, wound-care can be revolutionized by textilebased microfluidic systems, where aside from monitoring the wound itself, through the presence of different biomarkers in it, the microfluidic system can deliver needed drugs to the injured area, if need be. ...

A Sprayable Electrically Conductive Edible Coating for Piezoresistive Strain Sensing