Dan Zhao’s research while affiliated with Nanjing University of Science and Technology and other places

China has experienced rapid economic growth and serious control of aerosol emissions in the past decade. Thus, the spatiotemporal variations and driving factors of aerosol optical depth (AOD) are urgently needed to evaluate the effectiveness of aerosol control activities. The innovation of this study is a detailed spatial and temporal analysis of aerosol pollution in eight major regions of China from 2010 to 2020 using the MERRA-2 AOD reanalysis product and the driving mechanism based on the Granger causality test, sensitivity, and contribution analysis. The results show that the spatial distribution of AOD varied across the areas. Divided by the Hu Line, the AOD values of the Eastern areas were significantly higher than those of the Western areas. The temporal trend in the last eleven years was dominated by a continuous decline and moderate fluctuations at both annual and seasonal scales. The relationship between socioeconomic factors and AOD drivers was more significant in economically developed regions, suggesting that China pays more attention to haze control while developing its economy. The driving relationship between AOD and temperature was weak, while wind speed and relative humidity were more influential. For vegetation factors, Granger effects were mainly observed in the Northeast, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Guangdong, Central China, and Southwest regions. In the Guangdong and Southwest regions, vegetation and economic factors were the more influential drivers. This study provides a scientific basis for the detection of aerosol changes, driving mechanisms and pollution management in China.

As a direct indicator of vegetation photosynthesis, the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) serves as a critical input in a series of land surface models. While existing satellite FPAR products are generally at coarse resolutions ranging from 250 m to 1 km, operational FPAR products at fine resolution are urgently needed in studying land surface processes at the plot scale. However, existing methods for estimating fine-resolution FPAR were mainly designed for Landsat data, and few studies have attempted to develop algorithms for Sentinel-2 data. In particular, the operational estimation of decameter FPAR has a higher requirement for the algorithms in terms of generalizability, efficiency, accuracy, and adaptability to Sentinel-2 data. In this paper, we developed a retrieval chain on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform to estimate FPAR by learning the relationship between MODIS FPAR and Sentinel-2 surface reflectance. Scale-consistent multilinear models were used to model the relationship between MODIS FPAR and Sentinel-2 surface reflectance, and the model coefficients were regressed from the selected training samples. To account for the spectral and spatial characteristics of the Sentinel-2 data, we designed criteria for selecting training samples and compared different band combinations. Three strategies for band combination were used: (1) green, red, and near infrared (NIR) bands at 10 m resolution (i.e., three bands); (2) green, red, NIR, and red edge (RE) 1, RE2, and RE3 bands at 20 m resolution (i.e., five bands); and (3) green, red, NIR, RE1, RE2, RE3, shortwave infrared1 (SWIR1) and SWIR2 bands at 20 m resolution (i.e., eight bands). Meanwhile, the official Sentinel Application Platform (SNAP) method has also been implemented to estimate the Sentinel FPAR at 10 m and 20 m resolutions for comparison. Both methods were applied to the western Guanzhong area, Shaanxi Province, China, for FPAR estimation of all cloud-free Sentinel-2 images in 2021. The results show that the scaling-based method using five bands at 20 m resolution was the most accurate compared to the in situ measurements (RMSE = 0.076 and R² = 0.626), which outperformed the SNAP method at 10 m and 20 m resolutions and the scaling-based method using other strategies. The results of the scaling-based method using all three strategies were highly consistent with the MODIS FPAR product, while the SNAP method systematically underestimated FPAR values compared to the MODIS FPAR products. The proposed method is more ready-to-use and more efficient than SNAP software. Considering that the service of the MODIS sensor is overdue, the proposed method can be extended to alternatives to MODIS products, such as VIIRS and Sentinel-3 data.