DL WANN's research while affiliated with Murray State University and other places
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publication (1)
Peripheral membership status in a desirable ingroup was predicted to elevate outgroup derogation when Ss believed other ingroup members might learn of their responses. Less negativity toward outgroups was expected when peripheral members' responses were to remain private. Core ingroup members, in contrast, were not expected to show public-private d...
Citations
... This line of research has mainly focused on the reactions of adults whose sense of inclusion by a group is lowered or threatened (e.g., people who are on the margins of a group or are excluded by the group). Adults in such situations often respond with relatively pronounced ingroup favoritism (Noel et al., 1995;Jetten et al., 2002;Williams et al., 2003;Vignoles and Moncaster, 2007), ingroup loyalty (Gómez et al., 2011), nonconscious mimicry of ingroup members (Lakin et al., 2008), ethnocentrism (Greitemeyer, 2012), and fundamentalist beliefs that are endorsed by the ingroup (Schaafsma and Williams, 2012). For example, in one study, peripheral group members (who presumably felt a need to assimilate) showed greater distinction in their attitudes toward their ingroup versus outgroup members than core group members (Noel et al., 1995), suggesting that threats to group inclusion motivate ingroup favoritism as a means of re-establishing belonging. ...