D Robinson’s research while affiliated with Palo Alto Institute for Research and Education and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


FIGURE 1. The structure of mSLAM. A, Alignment of mouse and human SLAM isoforms. The signal peptide and the transmembrane domain are underlined. Potential N-linked glycosylation sites (F) and canonical amino acid residues () of the Ig C2 domain are indicated. Tyrosine-based signaling motifs are boxed. In comparison with mSLAM1, only diverging amino acids of mSLAM2, hSLAM1, and hSLAM2 are named and identical residues are replaced by (). Spaces are shown as (.) for optimal comparison. The nucleotide sequences of mSLAM1 and mSLAM2 have been deposited at GenBank with accession numbers AF149791 and AF149792, respectively. B, Exon/intron organization of mSLAM gene. Exons are depicted as either grey boxes for coding or as white boxes for untranslated regions. Lengths of the sequences were determined either by PCR or DNA sequencing and are indicated for exons in bp above the figure and for introns in kb below. The entire mSLAM gene is about 34 kb. C, Partial restriction enzyme map of the mSLAM genomic locus. Genomic DNA clones were isolated and restriction enzyme sites were determined: BHI, BamHI; RI, EcoRI; RV, EcoRV; HIII, HindIII; SI, SacI.
FIGURE 2. SLAM is expressed on mouse thymocytes, T cells, and B cells. A, Thymocytes were stained with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 (vs isotypematched controls; not shown) together with an anti-mSLAM mAb, or an isotype-matched control Ig. Histograms of mSLAM (dark line) vs the isotype control (grey lines) are shown for populations gated on CD4 and CD8 single-positive cells, or CD4 , CD8 double-positive populations. B, Spleen cell suspensions were stained with anti-CD4, or anti-CD8, or B220 (vs isotype-matched controls; not shown) together with an anti-mSLAM mAb, or an isotype-matched control. The cells were stained freshly, or after activation with anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 (T cells), or LPS (B cells) for 48 h. Histograms of mSLAM (dark line) vs the isotype control (grey lines) are shown for populations gated on CD4 , CD8 single-positive T cells, or B220 B cells.
FIGURE 4. Th1 but not Th2 cells respond to anti-mSLAM mAb. A, Th1 and Th2 clones were cultured in IL-2 for 5 days after their last antigenic stimulation and then stimulated with anti-mSLAM mAbs (10 g/ml) alone, or in the presence or absence of soluble anti-CD3 (100 ng/ml for this clone), plus or minus IL-2, or incubated in medium alone. Supernatants were collected after 48 h and analyzed for IFN-or IL-4 production by immunoassay. Under no circumstances were Th1 clones induced to produce IL-4, or Th2 clones induced to produce IFN-(data not shown). Values not visible were below the level of detectability of the assay (IFN0.1 ng/ml; IL-4 0.15 ng/ml). SE were obtained from triplicate mean values. B, A Th1 clone (top panel) and polarized Th1 cells (bottom panel) were cultured in IL-2 for 5 days after the last antigenic stimulation and then stimulated with anti-mSLAM mAbs (10 g/ml) alone or medium, plus or minus IL-12, IL-18, or a combination of IL-12 and IL-18; or with antimSLAM mAbs (10 g/ml) or medium, plus soluble anti-CD3 (100 ng/ml),
FIGURE 5. 
FIGURE 6. 
Molecular and functional characterization of mouse signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM): Differential expression and responsiveness in Th1 and Th2 cells
  • Article
  • Full-text available

January 2000

·

132 Reads

·

120 Citations

The Journal of Immunology

·

T M Hauser

·

·

[...]

·

A O'Garra

Optimal T cell activation and expansion require engagement of the TCR plus costimulatory signals delivered through accessory molecules. SLAM (signaling lymphocytic activation molecule), a 70-kDa costimulatory molecule belonging to the Ig superfamily, was defined as a human cell surface molecule that mediated CD28-independent proliferation of human T cells and IFN-gamma production by human Th1 and Th2 clones. In this study, we describe the cloning of mouse SLAM and the production of mAb against it which reveal its expression on primary mouse T and B cells. Mouse SLAM is expressed on highly polarized Th1 and Th2 populations, and is maintained on Th1, but not on Th2 clones. Anti-mouse SLAM mAb augmented IFN-gamma production by Th1 cells and Th1 clones stimulated through the TCR, but did not induce IFN-gamma production by Th2 cells, nor their production of IL-4 or their proliferation. Mouse SLAM is a 75-kDa glycoprotein that upon tyrosine phosphorylation associates with the src homology 2-domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2, but not SHP-1. Mouse SLAM also associates with the recently described human SLAM-associated protein. These studies may provide new insights into the regulation of Th1 responses.

Download

IGIF does not drive Th1 development but synergizes with IL-12 for interferon-gamma production and activates IRAK and NFkappaB

November 1997

·

21 Reads

·

599 Citations

Immunity

In these studies, IFN gamma-inducing factor (IGIF), unlike IL-12, did not drive Th1 development in BALB/c or C57BL/6 mice, but like IL-1alpha, potentiated IL-12-driven Th1 development in BALB/c mice. IGIF and IL-12 synergized for IFN gamma production from Th1 cells. Unlike IL-1alpha, IGIF had no effect on Th2 cells. IGIF signaled through IRAK, IL-1 receptor-associated kinase, to induce nuclear translocation of p65/p50 NFkappaB in Th1 cells. IL-1alpha had no effect on proliferation, cytokine production, or NFkappaB activation in Th1 cells but activated NFkappaB and proliferation in Th2 cells. Thus, Th1 and Th2 cells may differ in responsiveness and receptor expression for IL-1 family molecules. IGIF and IL-1alpha may differentially amplify Th1 and Th2 effector responses, respectively.

Citations (2)


... Le domaine intracellulaire du récepteur nommé Toll IL-1 receptor (TIR) interagit avec la protéine myeloid differentiation 88 (Myd88) et initie sa signalisation intracellulaire via les protéines IL-1 receptor-associated kinase (IRAK) et TNF receptor associated factor 6 (TRAF6), induisant ainsi la dégradation du facteur de régulation IB. Cela permet aux sous-unités p65/p50 phosphorylées de transloquer dans le noyau cellulaire et induit l'activation de NF-B [4,8,10,24]. L'IL-18 va également activer au niveau des cellules la cascade des MAP kinases (MAPK), extracellular signalregulated kinase (ERK), c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) et p38, le tout induisant une production d'IFN ␥ et la prolifération cellulaire [25]. ...

Reference:

Maladies auto-inflammatoires associées à l’IL-18
IGIF does not drive Th1 development but synergizes with IL-12 for interferon-gamma production and activates IRAK and NFkappaB
  • Citing Article
  • November 1997

Immunity

... In this review, we focus on the research progress on the CD2-CD58, 2B4-CD48, and SLAM-SLAM pairs in AD. The three pairs are involved in lymphocyte activation where they induced T cell and natural killer (NK) cell proliferation, adhesion, cytokine secretion, and cytotoxicity(183)(184)(185)(186). ...

Molecular and functional characterization of mouse signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM): Differential expression and responsiveness in Th1 and Th2 cells

The Journal of Immunology