D. Friess’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Figure 1. X-ray computed microtomography may be an important tool in the analysis of single pearls. This exceptional five-strand natural pearl necklace (4.45-12.20 mm) from the collection of Gourdji des Perles Fines, France, was certified recently at the SSEF Swiss Gemmo logical Institute. Photo by Luc Phan, © SSEF.
X-Ray Computed Microtomography: Distinguishing Natural Pearls from Beaded and Non-Beaded Cultured Pearls
  • Article
  • Full-text available

July 2010

·

1,822 Reads

·

318 Citations

Gems & Gemology

·

D. Friess

·

·

[...]

·

The distinction of natural from cultured pearls traditionally has been based on X-radiography. X-ray computed microtomography (μ-CT) has recently been applied to gain more insight into pearl structures. Using this technique, this article presents features observed in a selection of natural pearls and beaded and non-beaded cultured pearls. Based on these observations, μ-CT is shown to be a powerful tool for pearl identification.

Download

Citations (1)


... [28][29][30][31] Additionally, tomography studies have conrmed that the pearl layer oen deviates from the expected theoretical model. 33,34 While tomography now allows us to visualize the inner structure of a pearl, it cannot directly determine its composition. To bridge this gap, we employ in situ analysis to decipher the intricate relationship between structure and composition at a microscopic level. ...

Reference:

Structure versus composition: a comparative study across scales
X-Ray Computed Microtomography: Distinguishing Natural Pearls from Beaded and Non-Beaded Cultured Pearls

Gems & Gemology