Curtis Banks’s research while affiliated with Stanford University and other places

... This case illustrates the need for voluntary informed consent and avoiding excessive harm [11]. The Stanford prison experiment violated ethics by inflicting undue psychological stress on student participants randomly assigned as "prisoners," highlighting the need to minimize harm and respect human dignity [12]. In social psychology research, Milgram's obedience studies misled participants about the aims and risks of administering electric shocks, showing the need to avoid deception unless absolutely necessary [13]. ...

Reference:

Foundations of Scholarly Writing

... In recent years, hundreds of Italian prison officers have been accused of violent behavior or even torture toward incarcerated persons (ANTIGONE, 2024). More than 50 years after the Stanford prison experiment, many prison systems still reflect its findings, which suggest that violence and illness in prisons are rooted in their culture, management and policies (Haney et al., 1973;Specter, 2006). In this challenging context, the current research indicates that a prosocial shift in the social norms of prison officer culture could be a significant step toward resolving the critical issues of police violence and mental illness in prisons worldwide. ...

Reference:

Transforming prison culture: supportive norms enhance prison officers' well-being and prosociality toward detained people