Claire N. Friedrichsen’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Figure 1. Weed densities before and three days after grit applications in 2013 and 2014. Note that densities of living weeds may not reflect total damage to the plants. 
Table 1 . Grit application dates at corn vegetative corn growth stages for 2013 and 2014 at Aurora, SD.
Propelled abrasive grit applications for weed management in transitional corn grain production
  • Article
  • Full-text available

February 2019

·

378 Reads

·

15 Citations

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

·

Claire N. Friedrichsen

·

Frank Forcella

·

[...]

·

Weed control is challenging to farmers who are transitioning from production systems that use synthetic herbicides to organic systems. A 2-year field study examined air-propelled corncob grit abrasion for in-row weed control efficacy and effect on corn yield. Grit was applied based on corn vegetative developmental stages with one (V1, V3 or V5), two (V1 + V3, V1 + V5, or V3 + V5), or three (V1 + V3 + V5) applications. Flame-weeding or cultivation was used after the V5 application for between-row weed control. Grit applications decreased in-row weed densities by about 60% (α = 0.05) and biomass up to 95% (α = 0.001). Between-row treatments provided similar control, and reduced weed biomass by 55% in 2013 (α = 0.01) and 86% (α = 0.001) in 2014. In-row grit treatments increased corn yield up to 44%, and yield was more influenced by in-row weeds than between row weeds. These results indicate that abrasive corncob grit for in-row weed control, supplemented with cultivation or flaming, can reduce weed biomass substantially and help maintain corn yield. However, timing and frequency of grit application need further refinement based on weed growth as influenced by climate, as treatments at similar corn growth stages did not consistently provide adequate weed control between years.

Download

Citations (1)


... The WCE of HW @3 WAS, HW @3 & 5WAS, CE @3 WAS+HW5@WAS, and P+HW5@WAS were comparable to the weed-free control at the flowering stage of okra, qualifying these weed control treatments as efficient. However, it is pertinent to consider the performance of these weed control treatments before the flowering stage since effectively managing weeds only at the flowering stage may not necessarily influence crop yield (Erazo-Barradas et al., 2017). Similarly, pendimethalin, CE @3 WAS, P + CE @5 WAS, and CE @3 & 5 WAS may be deemed ineffective as these treatments showed comparable WCE with the weedy check. ...

Reference:

Field Evaluation of Cassava Effluent, Hoe Weeding, and Pendimethalin on Weed Growth and Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) Performance
Propelled abrasive grit applications for weed management in transitional corn grain production

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems