Christopher Hilbert’s research while affiliated with University of Kassel and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (4)


“Other minds than ours”: a controversial discussion on the limits and possibilities of comparative psychology in the light of C. Lloyd Morgan’s work
  • Article
  • Full-text available

July 2018

·

285 Reads

·

9 Citations

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences

·

Christopher Hilbert

C. Lloyd Morgan is mostly known for Morgan's canon (An introduction to comparative psychology, Walter Scott, Limited, London, 1894), still a popular and frequently quoted principle in comparative psychology and ethology. There has been a fair amount of debate on the canon's interpretation, function, and value regarding the research on animal minds, usually referring to it as an isolated principle. In this paper we rather shed light on Morgan's overall scientific program and his vision for comparative psychology. We argue that within his program Morgan identified crucial conceptual, ontological, and methodical issues, that are still fundamental to the current research on animal minds. This also highlights a new aspect of his role as one of the "founding fathers" of modern comparative psychology. In order to understand Morgan's program, we briefly outline the historical context in which he began his work on a science of comparative psychology. We will then emphasize to what extent his taxonomy of psychological capacities, the development of his metaphysics for a comparative psychology, and his newly introduced interdisciplinary procedures justify Morgan's distinctive approach to still rather sensitive issues. In doing so, we aim to provide a more comprehensive picture of Morgan's methodological signature and we contend that a proper understanding of his canon can only be gained by taking it as part of this program. We finally understand his most renown considerations as part of his struggle to ascertain the limits and possibilities of the discipline he contributed to set up, and thus emphasize the need to keep the discussion going, notably on the accessibility of other minds than one's own and on the limits of one's research perspectives.

Download

C. Llyod Morgan’s Canon. Über den Gründervater der komparativen Psychologie und den Stellenwert epistemischer Bedenken

January 2017

·

5 Reads

·

1 Citation

Die Tierphilosophie ist eines der lebendigsten Felder der Gegenwartsphilosophie. Im Mittelpunkt stehen bislang die Frage nach dem Geist der Tiere, das Problem des Tier-Mensch-Unterschiedes und die Themenfelder der Tierethik. Die auf drei Bände angelegte 'Philosophie der Tierforschung' wirft einen neuen Blick auf dieses Gebiet und ergänzt es durch eine stärkere Berücksichtigung des gesamten Kontextes der naturwissenschaftlichen Tierforschung, inklusive der philosophischen Hintergrundannahmen, der Forschungsverfahren und -orte (Labor/Feld), der Handlungslogiken, Denkstile und Sprachspiele der Forscherkollektive sowie der jeweils ausgewählten Modellorganismen. Der erste Band stellt unter dem Titel 'Methoden und Programme' Geschichte und Systematik der biologischen Tierforschung, insbesondere der Verhaltensforschung, in den Mittelpunkt. Die beiden folgenden Bände wenden sich der biowissenschaftlichen Tierforschung hinsichtlich ihrer sozialen und ethischen Konsequenzen sowie bezüglich ausgewählter aktueller Forschungsfragen zu.



Citations (2)


... It is only the later Morgan who would shape comparative psychology into a more professional and methodological profound discipline and, we argue, this shift is to be understood as based on some careful considerations by Morgan on the very principles of the discipline to be established. Although it has so far attracted little attention (see however Böhnert & Hilbert (2016); Fitzpatrick & Goodrich (2017)), this productive change in perspective seems nonetheless very important. Besides the taxonomy of psychological faculties already established, the major impact of two more key characteristics to Morgan's program should be here considered: first, the required metaphysics and second, the methodology (see section 5 below) of a comparative psychology, provided it could ever rise to the state of a science. ...

Reference:

“Other minds than ours”: a controversial discussion on the limits and possibilities of comparative psychology in the light of C. Lloyd Morgan’s work
C. Llyod Morgan’s Canon. Über den Gründervater der komparativen Psychologie und den Stellenwert epistemischer Bedenken

... Thereby, the scientific nature of animal behavioural research is supposed to be secured (Hilbert 2018, 141-142). Throughout Ethology's history as a discipline, efforts were made to distance it from other behavioural research that explicitly used employed subjective states as explanations for animal behaviour, such as Animal Psychology (Toepfer 2011, 466-467) or Natural History (Wuketits 1995, 24). 3 On the other hand, there are also voices arguing for critical and reflective anthropomorphism (Wild 2013, 73;Böhnert and Hilbert 2018), or, by coining the counter-term "anthropodenial", criticise the a priori rejection of possible common characteristics of humans and animals (Waal 2006, 59-67). Especially in animal welfare research there is an ongoing discussion about the possibility of assessing animals' subjective states (Wemelsfelder 1997;Lijmbach 1998;Proctor et al. 2013). ...

“Other minds than ours”: a controversial discussion on the limits and possibilities of comparative psychology in the light of C. Lloyd Morgan’s work

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences