Chariklia Petsa’s research while affiliated with University of Aberdeen and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Original FLAIR image (a), hand-drawn lesion map (b), LGA lesion map (c), and LPA lesion map (d).
FLAIR, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; LGA, lesion growth algorithm; LPA, lesion probability algorithm.
(a) Boxplot of initial threshold (κ) values for LGA and Spearman’s Rho. (b) Scatterplot of lesion probability threshold values for LGA and Spearman’s Rho. (c) Scatterplot of lesion probability threshold values for LPA and Spearman’s Rho.
LGA, lesion growth algorithm; LPA, lesion probability algorithm; TLV, total lesion volume.
Scatterplots depicting the relationship between log-transformed automated and visual lesion ratings. (a) LGA vs. total Scheltens’ score. (b) LPA vs. total Scheltens’ score.
LGA, lesion growth algorithm; LPA, lesion probability algorithm; TLV, total lesion volume.
Bland–Altman plots of log-transformed LGA and Scheltens’ score (a) and log-transformed LPA and Scheltens’ score (b).
LGA, lesion growth algorithm; LPA, lesion probability algorithm.
Manual segmentation vs. automated segmentation Bland-Altman plots. (a) Manual and LGA, (b) manual and LPA.
LGA, lesion growth algorithm; LPA, lesion probability algorithm.

+3

Validation and comparison of two automated methods for quantifying brain white matter hyperintensities of presumed vascular origin
  • Article
  • Full-text available

October 2019

·

267 Reads

·

8 Citations

·

Chariklia Petsa

·

Chris J. McNeil

·

[...]

·

Objectives: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are a common imaging finding indicative of cerebral small vessel disease. Lesion segmentation algorithms have been developed to overcome issues arising from visual rating scales. In this study, we evaluated two automated methods and compared them to visual and manual segmentation to determine the most robust algorithm provided by the open-source Lesion Segmentation Toolbox (LST). Methods: We compared WMH data from visual ratings (Scheltens' scale) with those derived from algorithms provided within LST. We then compared spatial and volumetric WMH data derived from manually-delineated lesion maps with WMH data and lesion maps provided by the LST algorithms. Results: We identified optimal initial thresholds for algorithms provided by LST compared with visual ratings (Lesion Growth Algorithm (LGA): initial κ and lesion probability thresholds, 0.5; Lesion Probability Algorithm (LPA) lesion probability threshold, 0.65). LGA was found to perform better then LPA compared with manual segmentation. Conclusion: LGA appeared to be the most suitable algorithm for quantifying WMH in relation to cerebral small vessel disease, compared with Scheltens' score and manual segmentation. LGA offers a user-friendly, effective WMH segmentation method in the research environment.

Download

Citations (1)


... This process generates a lesion mask, which was subsequently used for volume determination using the "Extract values of interest" function, part of the LST tool, version 3.0.0 [22]. The resulting numerical lesion size values (in milliliters) were then incorporated into additional statistical analyses. ...

Reference:

Impact of Brain Lesion Characteristics on Motor Function and Cortical Reorganization in Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
Validation and comparison of two automated methods for quantifying brain white matter hyperintensities of presumed vascular origin