Catherine Hurd’s research while affiliated with Ball State University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


TABLE 1 Incidence of particular forms of ED sexual activity by sex of respondent 
Extradyadic Involvement during Dating
  • Article
  • Full-text available

April 1999

·

1,527 Reads

·

147 Citations

·

Catherine Hurd

College student men (n = 299) and women (n = 392) reported their experiences with extradyadic (ED) dating and sexual activity. We also investigated the relationships between ED activity and religiosity, sex–love–marriage association beliefs, narcissism, sexual sensation seeking, a ‘ludic’ or game-playing orientation to romantic relationships, and self-perceived ability to deceive one’s dating partner. Despite normative disapproval for ED activity, a majority of respondents reported having had ED involvement while dating. There was no sex difference in the incidence of ED dating or ED kissing; however, men were more likely than women to experience ED fondling, oral sex, or vaginal intercourse. In general, ED dating and ED sexual activity were related to less adherence to sex–love–marriage association beliefs, increased sexual sensation seeking, a ‘ludic’ love style, and a self-perceived ability to deceive one’s dating partner. Findings are discussed with regard to possible implications and directions for future research.

Download

Citations (1)


... But traditionally the infidelity, signs of defects in the couple's relationship, and infidelity occurs only in dull and bad relations (Scheinkman & Werneck, 2010;Pittman & Wagers, 2005). Atkins et al. (2001) Showed that dissatisfaction alone is not a predictor of infidelity, Infidelity can be for reasons such as reduced in marital satisfaction (Thompson, 1983), increase negative interactions than positive exchanges (Allen et al., 2008), quality alternatives (Rusbult, Drigotas, & Verette, 1994), attachment (Bogaert &Sadava, 2002), self-expansion (Lewandowski, & Ackerman, 2006), extraversion and openness to experience (Orzeck & Lung ,2005), the third person's physical attractiveness (Wiederman & Hurd, 1999), religion (Whisman, Gordon & Chatav, 2007), have. Jackman (2015) the desirable attitudes towards infidelity, social approval and also reduce the attractiveness wife as reasons for infidelity. ...

Reference:

Qualitative Evaluation of Men Vulnerability to Extramarital Relations
Extradyadic Involvement during Dating