Casey Opitz’s research while affiliated with University of Virginia and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (36)


Aqua Company (B)
  • Article

April 2010

·

16 Reads

SSRN Electronic Journal

·

Casey Opitz

This case follows "Aqua Company (A)," F-0778. After the investment bankers recommend a price for Aqua in terms of financing, a stockholder of the family-owned company threatens to block the takeover, and Merrill Lynch must determine whether to offer a bridge loan to speed the deal. Two instructor Lotus worksheet files are available on computer diskettes for use with the teaching note.


Sprigg Lane (B)
  • Article
  • Full-text available

June 2009

·

439 Reads

SSRN Electronic Journal

This case is meant to follow "Sprigg Lane (A)" (QA-0372), which introduces Monte Carlo simulation as a valuation technique. The B case introduces the use of Black-Scholes to treat a capital-budgeting decision as an option. In this case, the decision is whether or not to drill a gas well.

Download

Aqua Company (a)

June 2009

·

18 Reads

Investment bankers must recommend a price and terms of financing, including senior and mezzanine debt and equity for the acquisition of this company by a firm that arranges leveraged buyouts. The B case is F-0779.


Enigma Engineering, Inc.

June 2009

·

12 Reads

A lending officer of a large regional bank entertains the opportunity to position his bank in the senior debt, subordinate debt, and equity of the leveraged-buyout financing of this company. The student must value all three layers of capital to determine the most advantageous position for the bank.



Johnstown Corporation

October 2008

·

76 Reads

In this case, the owner of a small steel mill, which he has acquired and turned around, must determine how best to raise long-term capital for the firm: (1) through the private placement of long-term notes and warrants, (2) through an initial public offering, or (3) by selling the company. Student and instructor worksheet files are available for use with the case and teaching note.


Eastboro Machine Tools Corporation (V. 1.1)

October 2008

·

1,680 Reads

SSRN Electronic Journal

IIn mid September 2001, Jennifer Campbell, the chief financial officer of this large CAD/CAM (computer-aided design and manufacturing) equipment manufacturer must decide whether to pay out dividends to the firms shareholders, or repurchase stock. If Campbell chooses to pay out dividends, she must also decide on the magnitude of the payout. A subsidiary question is whether the firm should embark on a campaign of corporate-image advertising and change its corporate name to reflect its new outlook. The case serves as an omnibus review of the many practical aspects of the dividend and share buyback decisions, including: (1) signaling effects, (2) clientele effects, and (3) finance and investment implications of increasing dividend payout and share repurchase decisions. This case can follow a treatment of the Miller-Modigliani dividend irrelevance theorem and serves to highlight practical considerations in setting dividend policy.



Rosario Acero S.A. (V. 1.2)

October 2008

·

1,812 Reads

Darden Business Publishing Cases

In March 1997, the board chair of this small steel mill is pondering how to finance the growth of his firm: either with an initial public offering of equity or a private placement of 8-year senior notes with warrants. The task for the student is to sort out the comparative advantages and disadvantages of each alternative�including valuing the possible securities�and recommend a course of action.