Carlyn A. Wisherop’s research while affiliated with University of California, Los Angeles and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Association of ZAP and TRIM25 RNA binding mutants with SINV RNA. (A, B) ZAP KO or (C) TRIM25 KO 293T cells were transfected with (A) ZAP zinc finger (ZnF) mutants, (B) ZAP CpG RNA binding cavity mutants, or (C) TRIM25 mutants. ZAP or TRIM25 pulled down (IP) with Sindbis virus (SINV) or firefly luciferase (Fluc) RNA and in whole cell lysate (WCL) were assayed by immunoblot (IB). Blots were quantified with ImageJ. Data are representative of two independent experiments.
Interaction of ZAP or TRIM25 RNA binding mutants with TRIM25 or ZAP WT. (A, B) Western blot of ZAP KO 293T cells transfected with myc-tagged TRIM25 and (A) FLAG-tagged ZAPS RNA binding mutants or (B) FLAG-tagged ZAPL RNA binding mutants. Different amounts of (A) ZAPS and (B) ZAPL WT were transfected to match protein expression levels for each subset of ZnF mutants and CpG RNA binding cavity mutants. Blots were quantified with ImageJ. Data are representative of two independent experiments. (C) Western blot of TRIM25 KO 293T cells transfected with FLAG-tagged ZAPS or ZAPL and myc-tagged TRIM25 RNA binding mutants; n.d. stands for not detectable by western blot. Blots were quantified with ImageJ. Data are representative of two independent experiments.
Inhibition of SINV replication by ZAP and TRIM25 RNA binding mutants. (A, B) ZAP KO 293T cells or (C) TRIM25 KO 293T cells were transfected with (A) ZAPS RNA binding mutants, (B) ZAPL RNA binding mutants, or (C) TRIM25 RNA binding mutants, infected with SINV Toto1101/luc at an MOI of 0.01 PFU/cell, and lysed 24 hours post infection (h.p.i.) for measurement of luciferase activity. Different amounts of (A) ZAPS and (B) ZAPL WT were transfected to match protein expression levels for each subset of ZnF mutants and CpG RNA binding cavity mutants. Data from triplicate wells are representative of two independent experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences as compared to (A, B) ZAP WT or (C) TRIM25 WT within each subset of RNA binding mutants (by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001). Unlabeled comparisons are not significant.
Inhibition of SINV translation by ZAP and TRIM25 RNA binding mutants. (A, B) ZAP KO 293T cells or (C) TRIM25 KO 293T cells were transfected with (A) ZAPS RNA binding mutants, (B) ZAPL RNA binding mutants, or (C) TRIM25 RNA binding mutants, infected with SINV Toto1101/luc:ts6 at an MOI of 1 PFU/cell, and lysed 6 h.p.i. for measurement of luciferase activity. Data from triplicate wells are combined from two independent experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences as compared to (A, B) ZAP WT, wherein different amounts of (A) ZAPS and (B) ZAPL WT were transfected to match protein expression levels for each subset of ZnF mutants and CpG RNA binding cavity mutants, or (C) TRIM25 WT within each subset of RNA binding mutants (by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test: *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001). Unlabeled comparisons are not significant.
Inhibition of JEV translation by ZAP and TRIM25 RNA binding mutants. (A, B) ZAP KO 293T cells or (C) TRIM25 KO 293T cells were transfected with (A) ZAPS RNA binding mutants, (B) ZAPL RNA binding mutants, or (C) TRIM25 RNA binding mutants, transfected with a replication-defective Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) replicon RNA reporter, and lysed 4 hours post-reporter transfection for measurement of luciferase activity. Data from triplicate wells are representative of two independent experiments. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences as compared to (A, B) ZAP WT or (C) TRIM25 WT within each subset of RNA binding mutants (by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001). Unlabeled comparisons are not significant. (D) TRIM25 KO 293T cells were transfected with TRIM25 mutants. TRIM25 pulled down with RNA and in WCL were assayed by western blot. Blots were quantified with ImageJ. Data are representative of two independent experiments.

+2

The Role of ZAP and TRIM25 RNA Binding in Restricting Viral Translation
  • Article
  • Full-text available

June 2022

·

162 Reads

·

20 Citations

Emily Yang

·

·

Carlyn A. Wisherop

·

[...]

·

The innate immune response controls the acute phase of virus infections; critical to this response is the induction of type I interferon (IFN) and resultant IFN-stimulated genes to establish an antiviral environment. One such gene, zinc finger antiviral protein (ZAP), is a potent antiviral factor that inhibits replication of diverse RNA and DNA viruses by binding preferentially to CpG-rich viral RNA. ZAP restricts alphaviruses and the flavivirus Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) by inhibiting translation of their positive-sense RNA genomes. While ZAP residues important for RNA binding and CpG specificity have been identified by recent structural studies, their role in viral translation inhibition has yet to be characterized. Additionally, the ubiquitin E3 ligase tripartite motif-containing protein 25 (TRIM25) has recently been uncovered as a critical co-factor for ZAP’s suppression of alphavirus translation. While TRIM25 RNA binding is required for efficient TRIM25 ligase activity, its importance in the context of ZAP translation inhibition remains unclear. Here, we characterized the effects of ZAP and TRIM25 RNA binding on translation inhibition in the context of the prototype alphavirus Sindbis virus (SINV) and JEV. To do so, we generated a series of ZAP and TRIM25 RNA binding mutants, characterized loss of their binding to SINV genomic RNA, and assessed their ability to interact with each other and to suppress SINV replication, SINV translation, and JEV translation. We found that mutations compromising general RNA binding of ZAP and TRIM25 impact their ability to restrict SINV replication, but mutations specifically targeting ZAP CpG-mediated RNA binding have a greater effect on SINV and JEV translation inhibition. Interestingly, ZAP-TRIM25 interaction is a critical determinant of JEV translation inhibition. Taken together, these findings illuminate the contribution of RNA binding and co-factor interaction to the synergistic inhibition of viral translation by ZAP and TRIM25.

Download

Citations (1)


... Previous mutagenesis studies have revealed that the RNA binding of both ZAP and TRIM25 is important for their restriction of viral replication, particularly for mutation in the CpG binding site of ZAP [10,98]. Secondly, the interaction of ZAP with TRIM25 is critical for their inhibition on viral protein translation, and TRIM25 is required for ZAP-mediated antiviral responses [98,99]. To confirm the contribution of TRIM25 to ZAP RNA binding, mutants of the TRIM25 RNA-binding domain SPRY and SPRY/7K motif were constructed, and the results indicated that the loss of TRIM25 RNA-binding ability greatly reduces ZAP antiviral activity [14]. ...

Reference:

The Function of TRIM25 in Antiviral Defense and Viral Immune Evasion
The Role of ZAP and TRIM25 RNA Binding in Restricting Viral Translation