Carlos Jordan’s research while affiliated with Ghent University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


Spatter formation mechanism “after [23]”
The line tracks on the top surface of the test object, the length of each line track is 8.8 mm
Processing parameter window for the single tracks of 316L stainless steel (bubble diameter is proportional to the linear energy density)
Schematic of the off-axis high-speed camera setup mounted on the LPBF machine. The camera is installed on top of the LPBF machine with an inclination angle of about 25° with respect to the scan head, with pixel size of 100 µm over a field-of-view of 12 mm × 12 mm
Image segmentation method of process zone and spatter (a) raw image frame binarized at cut-off value 40, (b) melt pool and vapor plume (process zone) segmentation, (c) spatter segmentation

+12

Off-axis high-speed camera-based real-time monitoring and simulation study for laser powder bed fusion of 316L stainless steel
  • Article
  • Full-text available

February 2023

·

467 Reads

·

6 Citations

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Aditi Thanki

·

Carlos Jordan

·

·

[...]

·

In order to develop smart laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) devices that autonomously identify a defect and remove it during the process for first-time-right and zero-defect parts, it is important to develop reliable on-machine defect measuring capabilities. As defects in LPBF parts often occur below the layer that is being processed, capturing the information of a printing layer may not give information about physical phenomena that are occurring below this layer. Therefore, to predict volumetric features such as porosity only by looking at the layer being processed, the correlation between process signatures identified in-process and defects measured via post-process inspection methods (for example X-ray computed tomography) needs to be conducted. Hence, in situ monitoring and post-process metrology form a basis to better understand the fundamental physics involved in an LPBF process and ultimately to determine its stability. By utilizing high-speed imaging, various process signatures are produced during single-track formation of 316L stainless steel with various combinations of laser power and scan speed. In this study, we evaluate whether these signatures can be used to detect the onset of potential defects. To identify process signatures, image segmentation and feature detection are applied to the monitoring data along the line scans. The process signatures determined in the current study are mainly related to the features like the process zone length-to-width ratio, process zone area, process zone mean intensity, spatter speed and number of spatters. It is shown that the scan speed has a significant impact on the process stability and spatter formation during single-track fusion. Simulations with similar processing conditions were also performed to predict melt pool geometric features. Post-process characterization techniques such as X-ray computed tomography and 2.5-D surface topography measurement were carried out for a quality check of the line track. An attempt was made to correlate physics-based features with process-related defects and a correlation between the number of keyhole porosities, and the number of spatters was observed for the line tracks. Graphical abstract

Download

Off-axis high-speed camera-based real-time monitoring and simulation study for laser powder bed fusion of 316L stainless steel

September 2022

·

257 Reads

In-situ monitoring and post-process metrology form a basis to better understand the fundamental physics involved in the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) process and ultimately to determine its stability. By utilizing high-speed imaging, various process signatures are produced during single track formation of 316L stainless steel with various combinations of laser power and scan speed. In this study, we evaluate whether these signatures can be used to detect the onset of potential defects. To identify process signatures, image segmentation and feature detection are applied to the monitoring data along the line scans. The process signatures determined in the current study are mainly related to the features like the process zone length-to-width ratio, process zone area, process zone mean intensity, spatter speed and number of spatters. It is shown that the scan speed has a significant impact on the process stability and spatter formation during single track fusion. Simulations with similar processing conditions were also performed to predict melt pool geometric features. Post-process characterization techniques such as X-ray computed tomography and 2.5-D surface topography measurement were carried out for a quality check of the line track. An attempt was made to correlate physics-based features with process-related defects and a correlation between the number of keyhole porosities and the number of spatters was observed for the line tracks.

Citations (1)


... For in situ monitoring of metal AM, there are a variety of image features that are used as print quality indicators [14], [15]. In this work, we incorporate three of the most common features: the size of the melt pool, the average intensity of the melt pool, and the number of spatters. ...

Reference:

Hybrid Data Fusion for Low-Cost High-Speed Monitoring in Powder Bed Fusion 3D Printing
Off-axis high-speed camera-based real-time monitoring and simulation study for laser powder bed fusion of 316L stainless steel

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology