November 2012
·
92 Reads
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
November 2012
·
92 Reads
November 2012
·
75 Reads
November 2012
·
631 Reads
November 2012
·
43 Reads
·
1 Citation
November 2012
·
20 Reads
November 2012
·
130 Reads
November 2012
·
108 Reads
November 2012
·
54 Reads
November 2012
·
398 Reads
November 2012
·
79 Reads
... Stephan then demonstrated a new guideline: the mouth width is equal to the width between the canines plus 57% of the distance between the canines and the pupils, which differed on average by 0.1 mm (SD, 3 mm) [55]. Stephan and Henneberg proved that intercanine width is about 75% of actual mouth width with the error of − 0.2 mm (SD, 3.5 mm) [56]. Wilkinson et al. indicated that interlimbus distance was the most reliable variable to predict the Table 8 Correlation coefficient between soft tissue and hard tissue of lips in females Content courtesy of Springer Nature, terms of use apply. ...
November 2012
... Separate regressions (not shown) for women and men of own height (dependent variable) on the height of both parents as covariates produced an R square of 0.48 for women and 0.47 for men. The result supports studies noting that 10- 30% of the variability of adult height reflects socio-economic conditions, with the rest accounted for by heredity (Henneberg and van den Berg, 1990). For women, the parameter for the coefficient of variation of rainfall almost doubled from ~0.11 (columns [2][4]) to 0.20 (column [5]) after conditioning for heritable attributes. ...
November 2012
... Seventh, we are aware of the difficulty in using contemporary WHO categories for BMI as a framework for historical data, as health-relevant risk cut-off points in BMI may have shifted over time [56] . Eighth, BMI is generally limited as indicator for body shape, and technical studies are still debating on the most adequate way of relating body height and weight [57][58][59][60]. Ninth, we cannot control for the fact that delayed physical growth may also be an explanatory factor. ...
November 2012