Camilla Young’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


Figure 21.14.a Decision flowchart for choice of reporting approach for syntheses of qualitative, implementation or process evaluation evidence (Flemming et al 2018).Reproduced with permission of Elsevier
5.a PerSPecTIF Question formulation framework for qualitative evidence syntheses (Booth et al 2019b). Reproduced with permission of BMJ Publishing Group
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
  • Book
  • Full-text available

October 2019

·

36,508 Reads

·

13,893 Citations

·

Douglas G Altman

·

Patricia Aluko

·

[...]

·

Camilla Young

The revised edition of the Handbook offers the only guide on how to conduct, report and maintain a Cochrane Review. The second edition of The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions contains essential guidance for preparing and maintaining Cochrane Reviews of the effects of health interventions. Designed to be an accessible resource, the Handbook will also be of interest to anyone undertaking systematic reviews of interventions outside Cochrane, and many of the principles and methods presented are appropriate for systematic reviews addressing research questions other than effects of interventions. This fully updated edition contains extensive new material on systematic review methods addressing a wide-range of topics including network meta-analysis, equity, complex interventions, narrative synthesis, and automation. Also new to this edition, integrated throughout the Handbook, is the set of standards Cochrane expects its reviews to meet. Written for review authors, editors, trainers and others with an interest in Cochrane Reviews, the second edition of The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions continues to offer an invaluable resource for understanding the role of systematic reviews, critically appraising health research studies and conducting reviews.

Download

Citations (2)


... This is likely to lead to a wider coverage of health topics, a stronger focus on health equity, and attention to conditions with a high global burden of disease. In turn, this will help to ensure that harder-to-reach groups within the population benefit from Cochrane evidence and that intervention-generated inequalities are avoided [32]. Also, it is shown that higher authorship of underrepresented groups in Cochrane reviews is associated with greater considerations of equityrelated analyses in the reviews (eg, females [33]). ...

Reference:

Cochrane Reviews’ authorship has become more gender-diverse but remains geographically concentrated: A meta-research study
Equity and specific populations
  • Citing Chapter
  • July 2019

... The inclusion and exclusion criteria for study selection were formulated by two authors (O.U. and K.S.F.) in blind duplicate. Additionally, the risk of bias was independently inspected and rated at the study and outcome levers in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Evaluating Study Quality (Higgins et al., 2008). ...

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions