Camilla Young's scientific contributions
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publications (2)
The revised edition of the Handbook offers the only guide on how to conduct, report and maintain a Cochrane Review.
The second edition of The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions contains essential guidance for preparing and maintaining Cochrane Reviews of the effects of health interventions. Designed to be an accessible resou...
How to be sure you have included and represented special populations in systematic reviews on the path to clarity about health equity.
Citations
... The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalyseseEquity extension (PRISMA-Equity) 2012 guidelines steer authors of systematic reviews to consider equity at all stages of the review [12,13]. The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions includes a chapter for considering health equity in reviews [14]. Equity could be considered from incorporating an intersectionality lens in question formulation [15] to review processes, such as identifying patient-important outcomes. ...
![[object Object]](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/272324658200586-1441938666280_Q64/Vivian-Welch.jpg)
![[object Object]](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/277121994903553-1443082440377_Q64/Jennifer-Petkovic.jpg)
![[object Object]](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/273633549484046-1442250730727_Q64/Janet-Jull.jpg)
... e Chi-square tests and I 2 index were utilized to assess the heterogeneity. [20] Any values for I 2 >50% or P < 0.1 or were considered heterogeneous. We tried Cochrane's leaveone-out method to resolve the heterogeneous outcomes. ...
![[object Object]](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/11431281104726973-1670220861769_Q64/Elie-Akl.jpg)
![[object Object]](https://i1.rgstatic.net/ii/profile.image/272344392400909-1441943371412_Q64/Lisa-Askie.jpg)
