C. J. Pritzlaff’s research while affiliated with Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis and other places

We examined the effects of exercise intensity on serum leptin levels. Seven men (age = 27.0 yr; height = 178.3 cm; weight = 82.2 kg) were tested on a control (C) day and on 5 exercise days (EX). Subjects exercised (30 min) at the following intensities: 25% and 75% of the difference between the lactate threshold (LT) and rest (0.25 LT, 0.75 LT), at LT, and at 25% and 75% of the difference between LT and VO2peak (1.25 LT, 1.75 LT). Kcal expended during the exercise bouts ranged from 150 +/- 11 kcal (0.25 LT) to 529 +/- 45 kcal (1.75 LT), whereas exercise + 3.5 h recovery kcal ranged from 310 +/- 14 kcal (0.25 LT) to 722 +/- 51 kcal (1.75 LT). Leptin area under the curve (AUC) (Q 10-min samples) for all six conditions (C + 5 Ex) was calculated for baseline (0700-0900 h) and for exercise + recovery (0900-1300 h). Leptin AUC for baseline ranged from 243 +/- 33 to 291 +/- 56 ng x mL(-1) x min; for exercise + recovery results ranged from 424 +/- 56 to 542 +/- 99 ng x mL(-1) x min. No differences were observed among conditions within either the baseline or exercise + recovery time frames. Regression analysis confirmed positive relationships between serum leptin concentrations and percentage body fat (r = 0.94) and fat mass (r = 0.93, P < 0.01). We conclude that 30 min of acute exercise, at varying intensity of exercise and caloric expenditure, does not affect serum leptin concentrations during exercise or for the first 3.5 hours of recovery in healthy young men.

We examined the relationship between energy expenditure (in kcal) and epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and growth hormone (GH) release. Ten men [age, 26 yr; height, 178 cm; weight, 81 kg; O(2) uptake at lactate threshold (LT), 36.3 ml. kg(-1). min(-1); peak O(2) uptake, 49.5 ml. kg(-1). min(-1)] were tested on six randomly ordered occasions [control, 5 exercise: at 25 and 75% of the difference between LT and rest (0.25LT, 0.75LT), at LT, and at 25 and 75% of the difference between LT and peak (1.25LT, 1.75LT) (0900-0930)]. From 0700 to 1300, blood was sampled and assayed for GH, Epi, and NE. Carbohydrate (CHO) expenditure during exercise and fat expenditure during recovery rose proportionately to increasing exercise intensity (P = 0.002). Fat expenditure during exercise and CHO expenditure during recovery were not affected by exercise intensity. The relationship between exercise intensity and CHO expenditure during exercise could not be explained by either Epi (P = 1.00) or NE (P = 0.922), whereas fat expenditure during recovery increased with Epi and GH independently of exercise intensity (P = 0. 028). When Epi and GH were regressed against fat expenditure during recovery, only GH remained statistically significant (P < 0.05). We conclude that a positive relationship exists between exercise intensity and both CHO expenditure during exercise and fat expenditure during recovery and that the increase in fat expenditure during recovery with higher exercise intensities is related to GH release.

To test the hypothesis that heightened sympathetic outflow precedes and predicts the magnitude of the growth hormone (GH) response to acute exercise (Ex), we studied 10 men [age 26.1 +/- 1.7 (SE) yr] six times in randomly assigned order (control and 5 Ex intensities). During exercise, subjects exercised for 30 min (0900-0930) on each occasion at a single intensity: 25 and 75% of the difference between lactate threshold (LT) and rest (0.25LT, 0.75LT), at LT, and at 25 and 75% of the difference between LT and peak (1.25LT, 1.75LT). Mean values for peak plasma epinephrine (Epi), plasma norepinephrine (NE), and serum GH concentrations were determined [Epi: 328 +/- 93 (SE), 513 +/- 76, 584 +/- 109, 660 +/- 72, and 2,614 +/- 579 pmol/l; NE: 2. 3 +/- 0.2, 3.9 +/- 0.4, 6.9 +/- 1.0, 10.7 +/- 1.6, and 23.9 +/- 3.9 nmol/l; GH: 3.6 +/- 1.5, 6.6 +/- 2.0, 7.0 +/- 2.0, 10.7 +/- 2.4, and 13.7 +/- 2.2 microg/l for 0.25, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, and 1.75LT, respectively]. In all instances, the time of peak plasma Epi and NE preceded peak GH release. Plasma concentrations of Epi and NE always peaked at 20 min after the onset of Ex, whereas times to peak for GH were 54 +/- 6 (SE), 44 +/- 5, 38 +/- 4, 38 +/- 4, and 37 +/- 2 min after the onset of Ex for 0.25-1.75LT, respectively. ANOVA revealed that intensity of exercise did not affect the foregoing time delay between peak NE or Epi and peak GH (range 17-24 min), with the exception of 0.25LT (P < 0.05). Within-subject linear regression analysis disclosed that, with increasing exercise intensity, change in (Delta) GH was proportionate to both DeltaNE (P = 0.002) and DeltaEpi (P = 0.014). Furthermore, within-subject multiple-regression analysis indicated that the significant GH increment associated with an antecedent rise in NE (P = 0.02) could not be explained by changes in Epi alone (P = 0.77). Our results suggest that exercise intensity and GH release in the human may be coupled mechanistically by central adrenergic activation.

To investigate the effects of exercise intensity on growth hormone (GH) release, 10 male subjects were tested on 6 randomly ordered occasions [1 control condition (C), 5 exercise conditions (Ex)]. Serum GH concentrations were measured in samples obtained at 10-min intervals between 0700 and 0900 (baseline) and 0900 and 1300 (exercise+ recovery). Integrated GH concentrations (IGHC) were calculated by trapezoidal reconstruction. During Ex subjects exercised for 30 min (0900-0930) at one of the following intensities [normalized to the lactate threshold (LT)]: 25 and 75% of the difference between LT and rest (0.25LT and 0.75LT, respectively), at LT, and at 25 and 75% of the difference between LT and peak (1.25LT and 1.75LT, respectively). No differences were observed among conditions for baseline IGHC. Exercise+recovery IGHC (mean +/- SE: C = 250 +/- 60; 0.25LT = 203 +/- 69; 0.75LT = 448 +/- 125; LT = 452 +/- 119; 1.25LT = 512 +/- 121; 1.75LT = 713 +/- 115 microg x l(-1) x min(-1)) increased linearly with increasing exercise intensity (P < 0.05). Deconvolution analysis revealed that increasing exercise intensity resulted in a linear increase in the mass of GH secreted per pulse and GH production rate [production rate increased from 16. 5 +/- 4.5 (C) to 32.1 +/- 5.2 microg x distribution volume(-1) x min(-1) (1.75LT), P < 0.05], with no changes in GH pulse frequency or half-life of elimination. We conclude that the GH secretory response to exercise is related to exercise intensity in a linear dose-response pattern in young men.

(Full Text) (Abstract)