C. B. Gilbertson’s research while affiliated with University of Nebraska–Lincoln and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (21)


Runoff Control Comparisons for Commercial Beef Cattle Feedlots
  • Article

January 1979

·

9 Reads

·

9 Citations

Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers

C. B. Gilbertson

·

J. A. Nienaber

·

·

[...]

·

W. E. Splinter


Estimating Quantity and Constituents in Livestock and Poultry Manure Residue as Reflected by Management Systems

January 1979

·

7 Reads

·

12 Citations

Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers

'Best usable values' for livestock and poultry manure residue were calculated by use of a computer model. The values reflect gains, losses, and transfers of solids and nutrients that result from alternative manure management systems.



Earthen Pits for Manure and Recycled Flush-Water Storage

January 1978

·

6 Reads

Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers

More stringent pollution control regulations, the need to mechanize animal waste management, and to reduce the climatic effects on animal performance have increased interest in housed-beef-cattle feedlots. Flush systems reduce labor requirements for waste removal, but require large quantities of water. Even with ample water supply, recycling of flush water is necessary to economically operate the system. Solids contained in recycled waste water can accumulate in storage structures and reduce storage volume, making further recycling of effluent for flushing difficult, and producing odors. This paper summarizes results of a three-year study of the effectiveness of an earthen pit used to store manure and recycled flush water from an 1100-head-housed beef cattle feedlot.


NUTRIENTS AVAILABLE IN LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY MANURE RESIDUE AS REFLECTED BY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.

January 1978

·

6 Reads

·

1 Citation

The paper summarizes calculated ″best usable values″ for quantity and constituents in livestock and poultry manure residues. The values were calculated with a computer model developed to allow for losses, gains, and transfers that occur to voided manure from beef cattle feeders, beef and dairy cows, swine, sheep, layer hens, broilers, and turkeys. Calculated constituents in manure residue included total solids, volatile solids, N, P, K, Na, Ca, Mg, Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, As, and COD from dairy beef, swine, sheep, layers, broilers, and turkeys.


Effects of Ration Roughage Content on Viscosity and Theoretical Head Losses in Pipe Flow for Beef Cattle Slurry

November 1977

·

7 Reads

·

13 Citations

Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers

The objectives of the study were (a) to determine the viscosities of diluted feces from cattle fed at two levels of roughage feed, (b) to determine the effect of removal of solids greater than 500 microns on manure slurry viscosity, and (c) to determine the theoretical friction head loss of diluted feces at solids concentrations of 5 to 15% in non corrosive polyvinylchloride (PVC) pipe. After outlining the materials and methods used, results are reported. Feces from cattle fed low roughage and high roughage rations (LR and HR rations) are non Newtonian and pseudo plastic in response. Measurable differences exist in the viscosity of diluted (5 to 15% TS) feces from animals fed HR and LR rations. For a given TS concentration, the viscosity and theoretical head loss of diluted HR feces are greater than those from LR feces, and increase with TS concentrations. The estimated head loss for diluted feces with particles greater than 500 microns removed was about twice that of the head loss for diluted HR and LR feces when TS concentrations ranged from 2 to 6%, or from 6 to 15%.




Physical and Chemical Properties of Outdoor Beef Cattle Feedlot Runoff

August 1975

·

3 Reads

·

5 Citations

Within the past decade, emphasis has been placed on the quality of our environment. Beef cattle feedlots have been singled out as a significant source of environmental pollution. Environmental protection provided by control facilities requires basic knowledge of the physical and chemical properties of feedlot runoff. This bulletin summarizes studies of physical and chemical properties of beef cattle feedlot runoff completed from August, 1968 through December, 1972.


Citations (16)


... Formula for calculating annual expenses based on deviation from average yields: $135,402 + «com (bu) -105) x $80.11) + «bean (bu) -35) x $43.68) The gross energy content of feedlot beef cattle manure is 4347 kcal/kg (dry weight basis; Gilbertson et al. 1974). Assuming manure is 80% water, 1 ton (2000 Ib) will have a gross energy of788,706 kcal. ...

Reference:

Evaluating alternative farming systems: A case study for eastern Nebraska
Nutrient and Energy Composition of Beef Cattle Feedlot Waste Fractions
  • Citing Article
  • July 1974

... Based upon this research common characteristics have been published in accepted references from Natural Resources Conservation Service (Table 1), Texas Agricultural Extension Service (Table 2) and Experiment Stations of the North Central Regions land grant universities (Table 3). Original data for many of these reported values is from Linderman and Mielke (1975), Gilbertson et al. (1979), Swanson et al. (1971), , Gilbertson et al. (1975) and Gilbertson et al. (1972). Below Average: No settling facilities between the feedlot and pond. ...

Physical and Chemical Properties of Outdoor Beef Cattle Feedlot Runoff
  • Citing Article
  • August 1975

... With a precipitation dataset calculated, we then determined what value to use for lot CN to calculate runoff for each event. We collected cattle lot runoff data from 11 published studies (Balogh and Madison, 1985;Clark et al., 1975;Coote and Hore, 1979;Edwards et al., 1986;Gilbertson et al., 1971a;Gilbertson et al., 1979;Gilbertson et al., 1971b;Larson et al., 1976;Madden and Dornbush, 1971;Nienaber et al., 1974;Trooien et al., 2013) representing 21 site years. All studies reported annual precipitation and runoff amounts from a variety of cattle barnyards and feedlots, including paved and earthen lots, in six different states (Minnesota, Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota, Texas, and Wisconsin) and Canada. ...

Methods of Removing Settleable Solids From Outdoor Beef Cattle Feedlot Runoff
  • Citing Article
  • January 1971

Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers

... The condition that occurs is that people's perceptions and priorities still have differences with the goals. This is shown from the results of research by MacRae [36] that social, cultural, and political aspects have more influence on the success of waste management in Bali when compared to technical and economic aspects. This shows that good governance cannot guarantee the success of a program but is determined by policy actors who are able to support the running of a program. ...

WASTE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH.
  • Citing Article

... The USMARC cattle feedlot was an early example with a precipitation runoff system designed and constructed to contain the 10-yr, 24-hr storm, part of the earliest Nebraska standard. The system, described by Nienaber et al. (1974), was constructed in 1971 to serve south sloping pens and has been in continuous operation since that time ( fig. 2; 43A Ponds). ...

RUNOFF CONTROL FACILITIES FOR BEEF CATTLE FEEDLOTS IN EASTERN NEBRASKA.
  • Citing Article

... Early experimental work in the pumping of manure slurries focused on feasibility and a gross measurement of pressure drop, without developing a detailed analysis of the rheological properties of the manure slurry. Rolfes et al. (1977) assessed the friction head loss in beef manure PVC pipelines as a function of flow velocity, total solids (TS) concentration, and pipe size and found that head loss increases with increasing TS. They concluded that water head loss criteria were definitely inadequate for use in designing manure pumping systems. ...

HEAD LOSS OF BEEF MANURE SLURRY FLOW IN POLYVINYLCHLORIDE PIPE.
  • Citing Article
  • May 1977

... Unless properly managed, high soil nutrient concentrations in animal congregating areas of animal production sites can become a source for soil and water contamination. The amount and quality of manure accumulating on livestock production sites depends on many variables, including stocking density, length of active period, land gradient, climate, site management practices, and soil type (Gilbertson et al., 1975;Sweeten et al., 1985;Kissinger et al., 2007). Manure harvesting from accumulated areas can lower manure-derived soil nutrient levels. ...

Properties of Manure Accumulations from Midwest Beef Cattle Feedlots
  • Citing Article
  • January 1975

Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers

... Second, the liquid fraction of the slurry infiltrates into the soil carrying the smaller, suspended slurry particles into the soil pores. These suspended particles increase the viscosity of this liquid fraction of the slurry, thus reducing its infiltration into the soil (Bashford et al., 1977;Chen, 1986;Landry et al., 2004). As these effects tend to maintain the slurry NH X -N near the surface, they increase NH 3 volatilization potential. ...

Effects of Ration Roughage Content on Viscosity and Theoretical Head Losses in Pipe Flow for Beef Cattle Slurry
  • Citing Article
  • November 1977

Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers

... With a precipitation dataset calculated, we then determined what value to use for lot CN to calculate runoff for each event. We collected cattle lot runoff data from 11 published studies (Balogh and Madison, 1985;Clark et al., 1975;Coote and Hore, 1979;Edwards et al., 1986;Gilbertson et al., 1971a;Gilbertson et al., 1979;Gilbertson et al., 1971b;Larson et al., 1976;Madden and Dornbush, 1971;Nienaber et al., 1974;Trooien et al., 2013) representing 21 site years. All studies reported annual precipitation and runoff amounts from a variety of cattle barnyards and feedlots, including paved and earthen lots, in six different states (Minnesota, Nebraska, Ohio, South Dakota, Texas, and Wisconsin) and Canada. ...

Runoff Control Comparisons for Commercial Beef Cattle Feedlots
  • Citing Article
  • January 1979

Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers

... We also compared how using empirical instead of measured precipitation would impact estimated annual runoff for the study by Nienaber et al. (1974), who monitored runoff from a cattle feedlot in Nebraska during 1971 and1972. For that study, we could not obtain event precipitation data for the exact research location. ...

Disposal of Effluent from a Beef Cattle Feedlot Runoff Control Holding Pond
  • Citing Article
  • January 1974

Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers