Brian Lipinski’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (8)


Food security, inclusive growth, sustainability and the sustainable development agenda
  • Chapter

September 2017

·

10 Reads

Craig Hanson

·

·

·

[...]

·

Kelly Levin

Food security, inclusive growth, sustainability and the sustainable development agenda1

September 2017

·

24 Reads

·

11 Citations

This chapter considers the food security challenge to 2030 and its implications for the sustainable development agenda. It first outlines three proposed food security targets that integrate sustainability and must be achieved by 2030: reduce the rate of food loss and waste by 50 per cent; reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from food production by 25 per cent; reduce the water-intensity of agricultural production by 30 per cent. It then discusses the grand challenge as well as opportunity at the nexus of food security, economic development and the environment and proceeds by introducing six core propositions aimed at meeting the food security challenge and how this challenge affects the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Finally, it explains how proposed food security targets would help feed the growing global population in a manner that results in poverty alleviation and economic development while reducing pressure on natural resources.


Food security, inclusive growth, sustainability and the sustainable development agenda

September 2017

·

5 Reads

·

7 Citations

Introduction Over the next several decades, the world faces an historic challenge and opportunity at the nexus of food security, economic development and the environment. The world needs to be food secure. The world needs agriculture to contribute to inclusive economic development, and the world needs to reduce agriculture's impact on the environment. This nexus has several implications for policymakers as they outline and implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by the United Nations in September 2015. Critically, this agenda has an explicit goal on food security. However, it is also important that the food security goal includes some sustainability targets and indicators. This chapter examines the food security challenge to 2050, and lays out six core propositions related to food security and sustainability. With an eye to implications of the food security challenge for the sustainable development agenda, it then details three proposed food security targets that integrate sustainability. These targets include reducing the rate of food loss and waste, and achieving low-carbon agriculture and water-efficient food production (Table 16.1). Finally, the chapter offers some reflections on how these targets would help the world feed a growing population in a manner that alleviates poverty and advances economic development while reducing pressure on its natural resources. The food security challenge Over the next several decades, the world faces a grand challenge – and opportunity – at the nexus of food security, economic development and the environment. First, the world needs to be food secure The United Nations Population Division projects the global human population to grow from 7 billion in 2012 to 9.7 billion by 2050 (UN DESA, 2015). Half of the population growth will be in sub- Saharan Africa (UN DESA, 2015), where agricultural productivity and soil quality is exceptionally low and where reliance on imports of basic staples is already high. Moreover, at least 3 billion people are likely to enter the global middle class by 2030, and they will almost certainly demand more resource-intensive foods such as meats and vegetable oils (Foresight, 2011). At the same time, approximately 795 million of the world's poorest people remain undernourished even today (FAO, IFAD and WFP, 2015).



Table 1 | How "Shifting Diets" Performs Against the Sustainable Food Future Criteria
Figure 3 | Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with the Average US Diet Were Nearly Twice the World Average per capita values, 2009  
Figure 5 | Per Capita Calorie Availability is on the Rise kcal/capita/day  
Figure 6 | Reducing Overconsumption of Calories Reduces the Agricultural Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with the Average US Diet by 4 to 6 Percent per capita values, 2009
Figure 7 | Protein Consumption Exceeds Average Estimated Daily Requirements in All the World's Regions, and is Highest in Developed Countries g/capita/day, 2009  

+8

Shifting Diets for a Sustainable Food Future
  • Technical Report
  • Full-text available

April 2016

·

2,306 Reads

·

129 Citations

Installment 11 of Creating a Sustainable Food Future shows that for people who consume high amounts of meat and dairy, shifting to diets with a greater share of plant-based foods could significantly reduce agriculture’s pressure on the environment. It introduces a protein scorecard ranking foods from lowest (plant-based foods) to highest impact (beef), as well as the Shift Wheel, which harnesses proven marketing and behavior change strategies to help move billions of people to more sustainable diets.

Download


Shifting Diets for a Sustainable Food Future

April 2016

·

11,111 Reads

·

100 Citations

Installment 11 of Creating a Sustainable Food Future shows that for people who consume high amounts of meat and dairy, shifting to diets with a greater share of plant-based foods could significantly reduce agriculture’s pressure on the environment. It introduces a protein scorecard ranking foods from lowest (plant-based foods) to highest impact (beef), as well as the Shift Wheel, which harnesses proven marketing and behavior change strategies to help move billions of people to more sustainable diets.


Creating a sustainable food future. A menu of solutions to sustainably feed more than 9 billion people by 2050. World resources report 2013-14 : interim findings

January 2014

·

5,040 Reads

·

209 Citations

The world’s agricultural system faces a great balancing act. To meet different human needs, by 2050 it must simultaneously produce far more food for a population expected to reach about 9.6 billion, provide economic opportunities for the hundreds of millions of rural poor who depend on agriculture for their livelihoods, and reduce environmental impacts, including ecosystem degradation and high greenhouse gas emissions. The forthcoming 2013-14 World Resources Report, Creating a Sustainable Food Future, responds to this challenge with a menu of solutions that could achieve this balance. This report provides an initial analysis of the scope of the challenge and the technical prospects of different menu items

Citations (6)


... This supports the notion that economic development should be in line with the goal of inclusive economic growth. Hanson (2013) stated that setting out clear targets for the reduction of food loss and waste in the agricultural sector would be of benefit for inclusive economic development. At the same time, the economic structure of ASEAN countries under the mainstream paradigm should be comprehensively reviewed toward the promotion of the concept of the circular economy for food. ...

Reference:

Value of food loss in ASEAN countries and its relationship with economic growth
Food security, inclusive growth, sustainability and the sustainable development agenda
  • Citing Chapter
  • September 2017

... The agriculture sector is critical for achieving food security (Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa, 2013). It also employs more than two billion people besides contributing significantly to the world's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and economic growth (Hanson, 2013). The sector also employs about 65% of the total African workforce (Huho & Kosonei, 2013). ...

Food security, inclusive growth, sustainability and the sustainable development agenda1
  • Citing Chapter
  • September 2017

... However, it has its own challenges such as loss of biodiversity, soil and land degradation, water pollution by agricultural inputs, greenhouse gases, loss of pollinators, and human health risks (Gomiero 2016;DeLonge et al. 2016). Reports suggest that there will be a gap of 11 GT of greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions from agriculture by 2050 to reach the target required to limit global warming below 2 °C to avoid the catastrophic impacts of climate change (Ranganathan et al. 2016). Thus, learning from the past experience with industrial/conventional agricultural intensification there is a common consensus among all the stakeholders, policymakers and researchers to transform the global food system which is sustainable (Gomiero 2016). ...

Shifting Diets for a Sustainable Food Future

... [3] Resource-wise, beef and dairy have the most adverse effects on environment, [4] wherein meat has the highest greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) per kilogram. [5] According to, [6] global 'animal-based food' production accounts for approximately 14.5% of annual human-induced GHG emissions, or 7.1 gigatonnes of CO2 equivalent. In Europe, a significant portion of food waste predominantly occurs at the end of the food chain, particularly at the retail and consumer stages. ...

Shifting Diets for a Sustainable Food Future

... In fact, in recent years, plant-based nutrition has been recognized not only as healthful and dietarily sufficient but also as having several distinct health advantages over meat-and dairy-based diets (Melina et al., 2016). Moreover, plant-based diets are associated with much less environmental damage (Ranganathan et al., 2016) and do not present questionable ethical issues regarding animal suffering (Lusk & Norwood, 2012). To put it differently, animal product-based diets are costly to our health and the planet and often inflict suffering on animals. ...

Shifting Diets for a Sustainable Food Future

... It is a key driver for climate change, environmental degradation, and antibiotic resistance 2 . A common strategy to quantify the efficiency of animal meat is to compare energy out versus energy in, and protein out versus protein in 3 . On a global average, energy conversion efficiencies range from 11% for poultry to 10% for pork, and 1% for beef and sheep; while protein conversion efficiencies range from 20% for poultry to 15% for pork, 4% for beef, and 3% for sheep 4 . ...

Creating a sustainable food future. A menu of solutions to sustainably feed more than 9 billion people by 2050. World resources report 2013-14 : interim findings