Boyd’s scientific contributions

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (2)


-1 Unit 1: WHAT DO WE MEAN BY ETHICS?
  • Conference Paper

February 2004

·

31 Reads

L Basford

·

·

I Thompson

·

[...]

·

Boyd

The aim of this unit is to give the reader an understanding of ethics, and an awareness of how fundamental ethical principles and our personal values and beliefs contribute to our way of thinking in making ethical decisions. AIMS By the end of this unit you should be able to: . Define the term Ethics. . Have explored personal beliefs, attitudes, and values. . Have an understanding of the delicate balance that exists between principles, and personal values when making decisions of an ethical nature.


2-1 Unit 2: 2 MORAL THEORY AND ITS RELEVANCE TO DECISION-MAKING IN HEALTH CARE

February 2004

·

20 Reads

The aim of this unit is to explore and examine the role moral theory plays in ethical decision making in health care. AIMS OBJECTIVES By the end of this unit you should be able to: . Outline the theoretical position of Kant, and identify the criteria used in deontological theory. . Outline the theoretical position known as teleology, and identify the criteria used in teleological theory. The required reading for this unit is as follows: REQUIRED READING This unit will be an outline and exploration of moral theory, and an evaluation of the objective criteria pertaining to these theoretical positions in making ethical decisions. Traditionally many nurses would make the claim, that in a medical world, ethical decision making has nothing to do with them. This is an attitude that is changing rapidly, with nurses demanding increased autonomy, and a right to be involved in the ethical decision making process concerning patients. This process of decision making demands that one is capable of identifying, and clarifying, clearly and objectively, the issues involved. One must be open to all sides of the argument, and be able to combine reason, that is theoretical arguments, with the subjective aspects such as feelings, intuitions and compassion for the patient and family involved. Moral theory affords one an objective framework from which to work within. Traditionally two models of moral theory are used, deontological and teleological. Following the outline of both these positions, concrete case studies will be presented enabling you to incorporate the criteria used in these viewpoints. It is essential that you discuss and reflect on these cases with a colleague.