Betty Vos’s research while affiliated with St. Catherine University and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (13)


Restorative Justice Dialogue: A MultiDimensional, Evidence-Based Practice Theory
  • Article

March 2007

·

419 Reads

·

85 Citations

Contemporary Justice Review

·

Robert B. Coates

·

Betty Vos

Restorative justice in the 21st century is a social movement that has moved far beyond its humble and rather marginal beginnings in North America and Europe more than a quarter of a century ago. Today restorative justice policies and practices are developing throughout the world in diverse cultural and national settings, with recent endorsements by the European Union and the United Nations. While still not the mainstream in any nation, restorative justice has clearly moved beyond the margins of social change in many locations and is beginning to enter the mainstream of criminal justice policy. The oldest, most widely used, and empirically grounded expression of this movement is restorative justice dialogue through victim-offender mediation, group conferencing, and peacemaking circles. These and related practices in which victims, offenders, support people, and other community participants have opportunities to enter into dialogue with each other to foster healing and the repair of harm represent the movement's foundation, upon which many other restorative practices and policies are developing. This article describes the underlying characteristics of authentic restorative justice dialogue, including specific indicators of its presence. The article provides assistance to practitioners and policymakers who seek to address issues of program development, evaluation, and measurement.


Responding to Hate Crimes through Restorative Justice Dialogue

March 2006

·

501 Reads

·

28 Citations

Contemporary Justice Review

Hate promotes violence. Dialogue among conflicting parties and groups is one way to decrease hate and help prevent bias-motivated crimes. Restorative justice has emerged in the last three decades as a means of giving all who are stake-holders in a crime—victims, offenders, and the community to which they belong—a voice in how harm can be repaired and future harm prevented. The present article reports on a two-year study of seven communities that utilized elements of a restorative justice dialogue approach as one component of responding to bias-motivated crimes and hate-charged situations. Following presentation of three case studies, the article highlights the invitational nature of such dialogue, the preparation of participants, and the dialogue process. It also examines factors that influence the dialogue, including the intense impact of hate crimes, the role of the media, and the involvement of outside interest groups. Finally, it explores ways to sustain the dialogue after the crisis recedes.


Restorative Justice in the Twenty-First Century: A Social Movement Full of Opportunities and Pitfalls
  • Article
  • Full-text available

January 2006

·

1,461 Reads

·

97 Citations

Marquette Law Review

Download

TABLE 1 Participants Interviewed by Crime Type
Victims of Severe Violence in Mediated Dialogue with Offender: The Impact of the First Multi-Site Study in the U.S

January 2006

·

334 Reads

·

49 Citations

International Review of Victimology

A small but growing number of jurisdictions across the U.S. offer victims of severe violence, including homicide, the opportunity to meet in a mediated dialogue session with their offender if they so desire. Such meetings are victim initiated and involve extensive preparation of the parties. This article reports on an intensive qualitative five-year study of mediated dialogue participants in two of the first states in the U.S. to do so, Texas and Ohio. Descriptions of the two programs and key characteristics of participants are provided, along with outcome data related to the experience of both crime victims and offenders in mediated dialogue in the context of severely violent crime.




Restorative Justice versus Community Justice: Clarifying a Muddle or Generating Confusion?

March 2004

·

188 Reads

·

23 Citations

Contemporary Justice Review

While Paul McCold’s intent to clarify the compatibility of restorative justice and community justice conceptual frameworks is laudable, his effort provides as much confusion as clarity (McCold, 200411. McCold , P . (2004). Paradigm muddle: The threat to restorative justice posed by its merger with community justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 7: 13–35. [Taylor & Francis Online]View all references, this issue). This piece identifies some of the conflicts inherent in the roots of the development and growth of restorative justice. It also raises concerns regarding how restorative justice theoreticians and practitioners consider community, the role of strangers, empowerment, prevention, and punishment within restorative frameworks. The authors of this piece conclude that, while it remains important to safeguard the underlying principles of restorative justice, it is also necessary to remain open to new possibilities and to new ideas.


Restorative Justice Circles: An Exploratory Study

September 2003

·

679 Reads

·

53 Citations

Contemporary Justice Review

Peacemaking circles have received a great deal of attention within the international restorative justice movement. The use of peacemaking circles for structuring communication and decision-making in many diverse cultures is probably as ancient as humankind. Peacemaking circles are particularly integrated and used among the many indigenous tribes of North America. This article reports on the development and use of peacemaking circles in South Saint Paul, Minnesota, representing the first exploratory study of circles in the US. The South Saint Paul initiative represents one of the oldest efforts in the US to adapt circles as a restorative justice approach within the community and schools. Peacemaking circles were found to be an effective approach to involve community members in the process of holding local offenders accountable for repairing the harm they caused, to assist crime victims, and to foster a greater sense of connectedness among all those affected by crime within the community.




Citations (13)


... Case studies have the ability to add depth and context to the understanding of how and why restorative justice policies are considered and adopted. When Washington County Court Services in Minnesota undertook a systemic shift toward restorative justice, the organization asked the Center for Restorative Justice and Peacemaking at the University of Minnesota to document their change process (Coates, Umbreit, & Vos, 2004). The authors found that reform was not prompted by any particular event or crisis, but was rather seen as a slowly evolving process within the context of a long-time progressive government ideology. ...

Reference:

A tale of two states: how U.S. state legislatures consider restorative justice policies
Restorative Justice systemic change: The Washington county experience
  • Citing Article
  • December 2004

Federal Probation

... Hoewel er een aantal gepubliceerde studies te vinden is over dialooggroepen met betrokkenen bij dezelfde feiten (bijv. Hansen & Umbreit, 2018;Umbreit et al., 1994Umbreit et al., , 2000Umbreit et al., , 2001Umbreit et al., , 2006 zijn er, voor zover ons bekend, nauwelijks gepubliceerde studies over de impact van herstelgerichte dialooggroepen (HDG) met betrokkenen van niet-gerelateerde feiten. We vonden drie gepubliceerde rapporten van dergelijke HDG inzake misdaden zoals moord, aanranding, zware mishandeling, huiselijk geweld en inbraken (Armour et al., 2006;Burns, 2002;Lovell et al., 2002). ...

The impact of victim-offender mediation: Two decades of research
  • Citing Article
  • December 2001

Federal Probation

... The outcomes studies have been carried out in family group conferencing in Australia which treats the issue of forgiveness and changes in victim"s perception of the offender in major and minor crimes (Strang, 2002) and VOMD (Victim Offender Mediated Dialogue) in Ohio and Texas (Umbreit et al,2003). The issue of satisfaction in VOM (Victim Offender Mediation) was shown in some programs in North America and Europe which has some data on forgiveness constructs which can set tone for healing (Umbreit, Coates, & Vos, 2002). ...

The impact of restorative justice conferencing: A multi-national perspective
  • Citing Article
  • January 2002

British Journal of Community Justice

... In 2021, the MCPP CPDs were implemented to strengthen relationships between community and the police using a restorative dialogue format. Community-police conflicts and public safetyrelated harms are elements that restorative justice, a practice focused on reconciliation between offenders and victims, are equipped to address (Coates et al., 2003;Newkirk, 2016;Nicholl, 1999). The robust structure of MCPP already in place provided an opportunity to implement dialogues between the community and police. ...

Restorative Justice Circles: An Exploratory Study
  • Citing Article
  • September 2003

Contemporary Justice Review

... Deelnemers aan VOM zijn over het algemeen tevreden. Een review van 63 studies 18 vond hoge niveaus van tevredenheid onder deelnemers ongeacht het type dader of slachtoffer, de locatie of de culturele achtergrond van de partijen (Umbreit et al., 2002). Vergelijkbare resultaten werden gevonden in een meta-analyse van 35 studies, waarvan 27 VOM betroffen (Latimer et al., 2005). ...

The Impact of Restorative Justice Conferencing: A Review of 63 Empirical Studies in 5 Countries

... • A focus on the harm caused by criminal behaviour • Voluntary participation by those most affected by the harm, including the victim, the perpetrator and, in some processes and practices, their supporters or family members, members of a community of interest and appropriate professionals • Preparation of the parties and facilitation of the process by trained restorative practitioners • Dialogue between the parties to arrive at a mutual understanding of what happened and its consequences and an agreement on what should be done • Outcomes of the restorative process vary and may include an expression of remorse and acknowledgement of responsibility by the perpetrator and a commitment to do some reparative action for the victim or for the community • An offer of support to the victim to aid recovery and to the perpetrator to aid reintegration and desistance from further acts of harm. (ONUDC, 2020, p. 4) L'approche réparatrice privilégie la participation active des différentes parties concernées, à savoir la victime, l'auteur du crime et la communauté, en facilitant les communications entre ces parties pour trouver une solution au préjudice causé par le crime (Roche, 2001;Umbreit et al., 2006;Van Ness, 1997;Van Ness et Heetderks Strong, 1997;Zehr et Mika, 1998). En d'autres mots, la justice réparatrice fait jouer un rôle central aux victimes de crimes (Wemmers et Van Camp, 2011). ...

Victims of Severe Violence in Mediated Dialogue with Offender: The Impact of the First Multi-Site Study in the U.S

International Review of Victimology

... Inclusion/exclusion criteria for individual study participation were a) being an active facilitator member of one of the teams in the case study programs, b) active in these teams for at least 6 months before the health-related lockdown (March 2020), and c) having used some type of online tool during the COVID-19 lockdown. Facilitators were chosen as the primary information source of information due to their indispensable role in the construction and development of the restorative process (Umbreit & Vos, 2000;Bazemore & Schiff, 2005;Van Camp & Wemmers, 2013) and as accessible figures, providing a longitudinal view of the adaptation and use of specific tools (ICTs). Placing facilitators in a central role of this research allowed an exploration of the dynamics and implementation of online tools throughout the restorative justice model. ...

Homicide Survivors Meet the Offender Prior to Execution: Restorative Justice through Dialogue
  • Citing Article
  • February 2000

Homicide Studies

... Restorative justice focuses on reducing and repairing harm caused by crime and conflict through accountability, reconciliation, and relationships (Coates et al., 2003;Umbreit et al., 2007;Van Ness & Strong, 2015;Zehr, 2002). Restorative principles and practices have been used in a variety of contexts including schools (Anyon et al., 2016;Bergseth & Bouffard, 2013;Boyes-Watson, 2008;Carey, 2020) and criminal justice contexts as an alternative method to resolve conflict without the traditional punishment-based system (Anyon et al., 2016;Bergseth & Bouffard, 2013;Carey, 2020). ...

Restorative Justice Dialogue: A MultiDimensional, Evidence-Based Practice Theory
  • Citing Article
  • March 2007

Contemporary Justice Review

... The hate crimes paradigm is grounded in retributive justice, which conceives crime as an act against the laws established by the State (Coates, Umbreit and Vos, 2006). This is characterized by a two-party adversarial design in which the offender (who is presumed innocent) and the state (which carries the burden of proving guilt) are pitted against one another (Saulnier and Sivasubramaniam, 2015). ...

Responding to Hate Crimes through Restorative Justice Dialogue
  • Citing Article
  • March 2006

Contemporary Justice Review

... Participants sit in a circle and pass a talking piece around. Only the person holding the object is allowed to speak, ensuring that each person has an opportunity to be heard (Coates, Umbreit and Vos, 2002). As the talking piece 3 The Navajo in the Southern US are doing their own circles in a peacemaking division. ...

A Case Study of Developing a Systemic Approach toward Restorative Justice in Washington County, Minnesota