Benjamin Vernot’s research while affiliated with Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (11)


Human stem cell resources are an inroad to Neandertal DNA functions
  • Preprint

April 2018

·

61 Reads

Michael Dannemann

·

Benjamin Vernot

·

Svante Paabo

·

[...]

·

J. Gray Camp

Pluripotent stem cells from diverse humans offer the potential to study human functional variation in controlled culture environments. A portion of this variation originates from ancient admixture between modern humans and Neandertals, which introduced alleles that left a phenotypic legacy on individual humans today. Here we show that a large repository of human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) harbors extensive Neandertal DNA, including most known functionally relevant Neandertal alleles present in modern humans. This resource contains Neandertal DNA that contributes to human phenotypes and diseases, encodes hundreds of amino acid changes, and alters gene expression in specific tissues. Human iPSCs thus provide an opportunity to experimentally explore the Neandertal contribution to present-day phenotypes, and potentially study Neandertal traits.


The Predecessors Within . . .

March 2018

·

44 Reads

·

6 Citations

Cell

By examining the genomes of present-day people from Asia, researchers show that modern humans met and interbred with Denisovans, distant relatives to Neanderthals, on at least two occasions. As a result, people today carry DNA from two different Denisovan populations. By examining the genomes of present-day people from Asia, researchers show that modern humans met and interbred with Denisovans, distant relatives to Neanderthals, on at least two occasions. As a result, people today carry DNA from two different Denisovan populations.


A high-coverage Neandertal genome from Vindija Cave in Croatia

October 2017

·

627 Reads

·

607 Citations

Science

Revelations from a Vindija Neandertal genome Neandertals clearly interbred with the ancestors of non-African modern humans, but many questions remain about our closest ancient relatives. Prüfer et al. present a 30-fold-coverage genome sequence from 50,000- to 65,000-year-old samples from a Neandertal woman found in Vindija, Croatia, and compared this sequence with genomes obtained from the Altai Neandertal, the Denisovans, and ancient and modern humans (see the Perspective by Bergström and Tyler-Smith). Neandertals likely lived in small groups and had lower genetic diversity than modern humans. The findings increase the number of Neandertal variants identified within populations of modern humans, and they suggest that a larger number of phenotypic and diseaserelated variants with Neandertal ancestry remain in the modern Eurasian gene pool than previously thought. Science , this issue p. 655 ; see also p. 586


Figure 3—source data 2.
  • Data
  • File available

September 2016

·

7 Reads

Results of differential gene expression analyses.Excel file (*.xlsx) with multiple sheets containing results of all differential expression analyses presented in the manuscript as well as GO enrichment analysis for the differentially expressed (DE) genes: Sheet 1: Genes specific to APs, not DE between chimpanzee and human; Sheet 2: GO enrichment analysis for genes of sheet 1; Sheet 3: Genes specific to Neurons, not DE between chimpanzee and human; Sheet 4: GO enrichment analysis for genes of sheet 3; Sheet 5: Genes specific to APs and upregulated to human compared to chimpanzee; Sheet 6: GO enrichment analysis for genes of sheet 6; Sheet 7: Genes specific to Neurons and upregulated to human compared to chimpanzee; Sheet 8: GO enrichment analysis for genes of sheet 7; Sheet 9: Genes specific to APs and upregulated to chimpanzee compared to human; Sheet 10: GO enrichment analysis for genes of sheet 6; Sheet 11: Genes specific to Neurons and upregulated to chimpanzee compared to human; Sheet 12: GO enrichment analysis for genes of sheet 11; Sheet 13: GO enrichment data used to generate Figure 3F.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18683.012

Download

Figure 1—source data 1.

September 2016

·

8 Reads

Processed single-cell RNA-seq data for chimpanzee cells.*.txt file containing processed chimpanzee single-cell RNA-seq data (344 single cells) in log2(FPKM) with genes in columns and cells in rows. The first 7 columns contain metadata for each cell: cortex: assignment of cell to cortex (1) or to other regions within organoid(0); tSNE_1: tSNE1 loading for each cell; tSNE_2: tSNE2 loading for each cell; PC1: PC1 loading for each cell; PC2: PC2 loading for each cell; species: species of origin for each cell; cell_id: unique ID for each cell, with information about the experiment and the age of the organoid of origin for each cell.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18683.004


Figure 3—source data 1.

September 2016

·

11 Reads

Processed single-cell RNA-seq data for human cells.*.txt file containing processed human single-cell RNA-seq data (207 single cells) in log2(FPKM) with metadata in first 4 columns for each cell: cell_id: unique ID for each cell; experiment: the experiment during which each cell was isolated; species: species of origin for each cell; cortex: assignment of cell to cortex (1) or to other regions within organoid (0).DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18683.011


Figure 1. Chimpanzee cerebral organoids recapitulate cortex development. (A) Bright-field image showing a representative chimpanzee organoid (Sandra A, left) and a cryosection from a chimpanzee organoid (PR818-5) immunostained for PAX6 (magenta) and Ctip2 (green) combined with DAPI staining (blue) (right) at day 52. Scale bars, 200 mm. (B, C) Cryosections of cortical regions from chimpanzee (Sandra A) and human (SC102A-1) organoids at day 52 immunostained for PAX6 (magenta), Ctip2 (B, green) and TBR2 (C, green), without (B) and with (C) DAPI staining (blue). Asterisks, ventricular lumen; scale bars, 50 mm. (D) Cartoon showing NSPC types (APs, BPs) and neurons enriched in zones within the neocortex at midneurogenesis. CP, cortical plate; N, neuron. (E) Heatmap showing normalized correlation (Z-score) of single-cell transcriptomes from chimpanzee cerebral organoid cortex with bulk RNA-seq data from laser-microdissected zones (Fietz et al., 2012) from 13 wpc human neocortex. CP, cortical plate. (F) Scatterplot showing NSPC and neuronal signature scores derived from analysis of fetal cerebral cortex single-cell transcriptomes (Figure 1-figure supplement 1) calculated for each chimpanzee cerebral organoid cortical cell. (G) Heatmap showing expression of AP, BP, and neuron (N) marker genes. Each column represents a single cell, each row a gene. Cell type and maximum correlation to bulk RNA-seq data from cortical zones are shown in the top sidebar. APs and BPs were sub-classified based on G1 (light grey) or S-G2-M (dark grey) phases of the cell cycle. (H) Lineage network based on pairwise correlations between chimpanzee cerebral organoid cortical cells reveals a structured topology where VZ-APs connect to cortical plate (CP) neurons (N) through SVZ-BPs. Cells are coloured based on cortical zone (top left) or cell type assignment (bottom left). APs, BPs, and neurons were classified based on maximum correlation with single-cell transcriptomes from the human fetal neocortex. Expression of markers PAX6, TBR2, and MYT1L are shown to the right. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.18683.003 The following source data and figure supplements are available for figure 1: Source data 1. Processed single-cell RNA-seq data for chimpanzee cells. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.18683.004 Source data 2. Genes describing cell populations in the chimpanzee organoids. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.18683.005 Figure supplement 1. Characterization of chimpanzee iPSCs. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.18683.006 Figure supplement 2. Deconstructing cell type composition in chimpanzee cerebral organoids using single-cell RNA-seq. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.18683.007 Figure supplement 3. Fetal human progenitor and neuronal neocortical signatures are recapitulated in chimpanzee cerebral organoids. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.18683.008
Figure 5. Differences in prometaphase-metaphase length between APs of human developing neocortex, human organoids, chimpanzee organoids and mouse developing neocortex. Live tissue imaging of mitotic phases, as reported by chromosomes, in organotypic slice culture of developing neocortex and cerebral organoids. 0 min is anaphase onset. Time-lapse is ~ 1.1 min. (A-D) APs in a coronal slice of 13 wpc human frontal neocortex (A), in a slice of a D30 human cerebral organoid from iPSC line SC102A-1 (B), in a slice of a D30 chimpanzee cerebral organoid from iPSC line Sandra A (C), and in a coronal slice of E14.5 mouse neocortex. The time indicated on each image is when that image was taken, relative to anaphase onset (0 min). White dashed lines, ventricular surface. Scale bar, 5 mm. (E-G) Time between the start of chromosome congression and anaphase onset (referred to as 'prometaphase + metaphase') (E), between the start of chromosome congression and the formation of a metaphase plate (referred to as 'prometaphase') (F), and between the formation of a metaphase plate and anaphase onset (referred to as 'metaphase') (G), for APs in the four tissues described in (A-D). Data include APs from 11-13 wpc human neocortex, organoids from the human iPSC lines SC102A-1 and 409b2, and chimpanzee iPSC lines Sandra A and PR818-5, and are the mean ± SEM of !60 APs from !4 independent experiments each. Bracket with **p<0.01; brackets with ***p<0.001; ***p<0.001 (mouse vs. all primate tissues). DOI: 10.7554/eLife.18683.015 The following source data and figure supplements are available for figure 5:
Elife Website Cover
Differences and similarities between human and chimpanzee neural progenitors during cerebral cortex development

September 2016

·

1,953 Reads

·

216 Citations

eLife

Human neocortex expansion likely contributed to the remarkable cognitive abilities of humans. This expansion is thought to primarily reflect differences in proliferation versus differentiation of neural progenitors during cortical development. Here, we have searched for such differences by analysing cerebral organoids from human and chimpanzees using immunohistofluorescence, live imaging, and single-cell transcriptomics. We find that the cytoarchitecture, cell type composition, and neurogenic gene expression programs of humans and chimpanzees are remarkably similar. Notably, however, live imaging of apical progenitor mitosis uncovered a lengthening of prometaphase-metaphase in humans compared to chimpanzees that is specific to proliferating progenitors and not observed in non-neural cells. Consistent with this, the small set of genes more highly expressed in human apical progenitors points to increased proliferative capacity, and the proportion of neurogenic basal progenitors is lower in humans. These subtle differences in cortical progenitors between humans and chimpanzees may have consequences for human neocortex evolution.




Excavating Neandertal and Denisovan DNA from the genomes of Melanesian individuals

March 2016

·

1,483 Reads

·

401 Citations

Science

Denisovan DNA retained in Melanesians Modern humans carry remnants of DNA from interbreeding events with archaic lineages, such as Neandertals. However, people from Oceania also retain genes from a second ancient lineage, the Denisovans. Vernot et al. surveyed archaic genomic sequences in a worldwide sample of modern humans, including 35 individuals from the Melanesian Islands. All non-African genomes surveyed contained Neandertal DNA, but a significant Denisovan component was found only in the Melanesians. Reconstruction of this genetic history suggests that Neandertals bred with modern humans multiple times, but Denosivans only once, in ancestors of modern-day Melanesians. Science , this issue p. 235


Citations (5)


... Svante Pääbo and his team working alongside their Russian colleagues, reported a ''Denisovan" from the cave in 2010, and subsequent genetic research of hominin fossils and sediment has opened up a new window into the complex history of modern humans and archaic hominin groups [11,12]. The research shows that Neanderthals, Denisovans, and early modern humans had frequent genetic exchanges and, most interestingly, the traces of gene flow into early modern humans from archaic hominin groups is still measurable in contemporary populations, albeit in small proportions [13]. Denisova Cave had remained the only case example with information on this mysterious hominin until Chen and colleagues [14] identified a Denisovan fossil on the eastern edge of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau based on paleoproteomic analysis, minimally dating to 160 ka by Uranium series dating (Fig. 1a, c; Table S1 online). ...

Reference:

The northern dispersal of early modern humans in eastern Eurasia
The Predecessors Within . . .
  • Citing Article
  • March 2018

Cell

... For this analysis, we retained only biallelic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) located within feature boundaries that exhibited minor allele frequencies below 1%. Complete great ape allele information was required for each variant, including data from Neanderthals and Denisovans, Chimpanzee, Bonobo, Gorilla, and Orangutan genomes [109,110,111,112,5]. The final dataset comprised genotype information from 15,746 rare variant sites across 350 individuals, with corresponding variant annotations. ...

A high-coverage Neandertal genome from Vindija Cave in Croatia
  • Citing Article
  • October 2017

Science

... Non-human primate iPSCs have recently been used to generate neural organoids to compare with human brain, revealing human-specific, ape-specific and primate-specific characteristics [5][6][7][8] . Comparisons with our closest living relatives -chimpanzees and bonobos -reveal human-specific features, whereas characteristics shared between human, chimpanzee and gorilla (a more distant great ape) indicate ape-derived features. ...

Differences and similarities between human and chimpanzee neural progenitors during cerebral cortex development

eLife

... The availability of Neanderthal and Denisovan sequencing data has enabled studies on admixture between archaic hominins and modern humans, leading to the discovery of their genetic contributions in human genomes [1][2][3][4][5][6]. All non-Africans carry approximately 2% Neanderthal-derived DNA [1,2,[6][7][8][9], while recent findings indicate that Africans also harbor more Neanderthal ancestry than previously thought [10]. Individuals from Oceania possess ~ 2-5% Denisovan ancestry, with smaller amounts of Denisovan sequences also present in Asian populations [7,8,11,12]. ...

Excavating Neandertal and Denisovan DNA from the genomes of Melanesian individuals
  • Citing Article
  • March 2016

Science

... Elevated introgression is apparent in some genomic regions while others show depleted introgression , consistent with positive selection (due to a fitness advantage of archaic introgressed variants relative to modern human variants) and purifying selection (due to a fitness disadvantage of archaic introgressed variants), respectively. This pattern is further supported by the depletion of archaic variants in conserved and regulatory regions Telis et al. 2020), and by findings that Neanderthal-introgressed variation in Europeans (among whom most genotype-phenotype association data are available) contributes to complex traits and disease (Dannemann and Kelso 2017;Simonti et al. 2016). Of particular interest, archaic introgression appears to have had an adaptive role impacting immunity, including in New Guinean populations (e.g. ...

The phenotypic legacy of admixture between modern humans and Neandertals
  • Citing Article
  • February 2016

Science