Barry N. Taylor’s research while affiliated with National Institute of Standards and Technology and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (29)


CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2018
  • Article

September 2021

·

232 Reads

·

201 Citations

Eite Tiesinga

·

Peter J. Mohr

·

David B. Newell

·

Barry N. Taylor

We report the 2018 self-consistent values of constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data of the International Science Council. The recommended values can also be found at physics.nist.gov/constants. The values are based on a least-squares adjustment that takes into account all theoretical and experimental data available through 31 December 2018. A discussion of the major improvements as well as inconsistencies within the data is given. The former include a decrease in the uncertainty of the dimensionless fine-structure constant and a nearly two orders of magnitude improvement of particle masses expressed in units of kg due to the transition to the revised International System of Units (SI) with an exact value for the Planck constant. Further, because the elementary charge, Boltzmann constant, and Avogadro constant also have exact values in the revised SI, many other constants are either exact or have significantly reduced uncertainties. Inconsistencies remain for the gravitational constant and the muon magnetic-moment anomaly. The proton charge radius puzzle has been partially resolved by improved measurements of hydrogen energy levels.


CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2018

June 2021

·

134 Reads

·

507 Citations

Review of Modern Physics

We report the 2018 self-consistent values of constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data of the International Science Council (CODATA). The recommended values can also be found at physics.nist.gov/constants. The values are based on a least-squares adjustment that takes into account all theoretical and experimental data available through 31 December 2018. A discussion of the major improvements as well as inconsistencies within the data is given. The former include a decrease in the uncertainty of the dimensionless fine-structure constant and a nearly two orders of magnitude improvement of particle masses expressed in units of kg due to the transition to the revised International System of Units (SI) with an exact value for the Planck constant. Further, because the elementary charge, Boltzmann constant, and Avogadro constant also have exact values in the revised SI, many other constants are either exact or have significantly reduced uncertainties. Inconsistencies remain for the gravitational constant and the muon magnetic-moment anomaly. The proton charge radius puzzle has been partially resolved by improved measurements of hydrogen energy levels.


Quantity Calculus, Fundamental Constants, and SI Units

June 2018

·

82 Reads

·

9 Citations

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

A revised International System of Units (SI) is expected to be established by the 26th General Conference on Weights and Measures when it convenes in November 2018 and to be put into practice starting on 20 May 2019, World Metrology Day. In consequence, the article published in this journal in 2011, “The Current SI Seen from the Perspective of the Proposed New SI,” is updated in this paper, which provides an opportunity to again demonstrate the usefulness of the quantity calculus in dealing with quantities and units. The quantity calculus and the seven defining constants of the current and revised SI are reviewed, and expressions for the seven current and revised SI base units are given. Relationships between the magnitudes of revised and current SI units and expressions for the numerical values of current SI defining constants expressed in revised SI units are also obtained using the quantity calculus.


FIG. 3 Values of the Boltzmann constant k inferred from the input data in Table IV, the CODATA 2014 value, and the CODATA 2017 value in chronological order from top to bottom (see Table XI). Dashed values were not included in the final 2017 adjustment. The inner green band is ±5 parts in 10 7 and the outer grey band is ±15 parts in 10 7. AGT:acoustic gas thermometry; DCGT: dielectric constant gas thermometry; JNT: Johnson noise thermometry. 
Data and analysis for the CODATA 2017 Special Fundamental Constants Adjustment
  • Article
  • Full-text available

November 2017

·

573 Reads

·

185 Citations

The special least-squares adjustment of the values of the fundamental constants, carried out by the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) in the summer of 2017, is described in detail. It is based on all relevant data available by 1 July 2017. The purpose of this adjustment is to determine the numerical values of the Planck constant h, elementary charge e, Boltzmann constant k, and Avogadro constant N A for the revised SI expected to be established by the 26th General Conference on Weights and Measures when it convenes on 13-16 November 2018.

Download

CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2014*

December 2016

·

188 Reads

·

411 Citations

This paper gives the 2014 self-consistent set of values of the constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA). These values are based on a least-squares adjustment that takes into account all data available up to 31 December 2014. Details of the data selection and methodology of the adjustment are described. The recommended values may also be found at http://physics.nist.gov/constants. © 2016 AIP Publishing LLC for the National Institute of Standards and Technology.


CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2014

September 2016

·

250 Reads

·

987 Citations

Review of Modern Physics

This paper gives the 2014 self-consistent set of values of the constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA). These values are based on a least-squares adjustment that takes into account all data available up to 31 December 2014. Details of the data selection and methodology of the adjustment are described. The recommended values may also be found at physics.nist.gov/constants.


Table 2 . Concise summary of the coherent derived units in the current SI with special names and symbols that appear in this paper (adapted from Refs. [1, 2] and unchanged in the New SI)
The Current SI Seen From the Perspective of the Proposed New SI

November 2011

·

6,321 Reads

·

9 Citations

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

A revised International System of Units (SI) proposed by the International Committee for Weights and Measures is under consideration by the General Conference on Weights and Measures for eventual adoption. Widely recognized as a significant advance for both metrology and science, it is defined via statements that explicitly fix the numerical values of a selected set of seven reference constants when the values of these constants are expressed in certain specified units. At first sight this approach to defining a system of units appears to be quite different from that used to define the current SI. However, by showing how the definitions of the seven base units of the current SI also fix the numerical values of a set of seven reference constants (broadly interpreted) when the values of these constants are expressed in their coherent SI units, and how the definition of the current SI can be recast into the same form as that of the revised SI under consideration, we show that the revision is not as radical a departure from the current SI as it might initially seem.


Adapting the International System of Units to the twenty-first century

October 2011

·

51 Reads

·

83 Citations

Ian M. Mills

·

Peter J. Mohr

·

Terry J. Quinn

·

[...]

·

Edwin R. Williams

We review the proposal of the International Committee for Weights and Measures (Comité International des Poids et Mesures, CIPM), currently being considered by the General Conference on Weights and Measures (Conférences Générales des Poids et Mesures, CGPM), to revise the International System of Units (Le Système International d'Unitès, SI). The proposal includes new definitions for four of the seven base units of the SI, and a new form of words to present the definitions of all the units. The objective of the proposed changes is to adopt definitions referenced to constants of nature, taken in the widest sense, so that the definitions may be based on what are believed to be true invariants. In particular, whereas in the current SI the kilogram, ampere, kelvin and mole are linked to exact numerical values of the mass of the international prototype of the kilogram, the magnetic constant (permeability of vacuum), the triple-point temperature of water and the molar mass of carbon-12, respectively, in the new SI these units are linked to exact numerical values of the Planck constant, the elementary charge, the Boltzmann constant and the Avogadro constant, respectively. The new wording used expresses the definitions in a simple and unambiguous manner without the need for the distinction between base and derived units. The importance of relations among the fundamental constants to the definitions, and the importance of establishing a mise en pratique for the realization of each definition, are also discussed.


Molar mass and related quantities in the New SI

February 2009

·

79 Reads

·

33 Citations

This letter addresses the calculation of molar mass and related quantities in the updated version of the SI (most often called the 'New SI' but sometimes the 'Quantum SI') currently under discussion by the International Committee for Weights and Measures and its Consultative Committee for Units and which could be adopted by the next General Conference on Weights and Measures in 2011.


Chapter 13 Extensive Calculations of High-Precision Energy Levels in Hydrogen and Deuterium Through a Least-Squares Adjustment

December 2008

·

23 Reads

·

1 Citation

Advances in Quantum Chemistry

Recent high-precision energy level calculations in atomic hydrogen and deuterium are presented. Numerical values are readily available on the web. The procedure found can provide new predictions in a relatively simple way, by relying on results obtained through the latest adjustment of the fundamental constants. The calculations are meant to yield optimal predictions. Some of the predicted transition frequencies have an uncertainty more than an order of magnitude smaller than that of the Landé factor g of the electron, which was previously the most accurate prediction of quantum electrodynamics (QED). These predictions were obtained by combining accurately measured transitions in hydrogen and deuterium with recent QED calculations. A mostly non-technical overview of the relevant adjustment procedures is given in this paper.


Citations (26)


... = 27.211 386 245 988 eV [32]). There have been prior calculations of 1,3 S and 1,3 P e − -Ps elastic scattering below the Ps(n = 2) threshold that employed the Kohn and inverse Kohn variational methods. ...

Reference:

Electron–positronium scattering and Ps photodetachment
CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2018
  • Citing Article
  • September 2021

... It was, however, argued [24,25] that this tension could be plausibly explained by unknown higher-order Zα-expansion terms. So, the recommended value for hydrogen [26] was obtained by assuming the consistency of the Zα-expansion and the all-order results. The optimistic error obtained in this manner nevertheless constituted one of the two primary theoretical uncertainties in the hydrogen Lamb shift [26]. ...

CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2018
  • Citing Article
  • June 2021

Review of Modern Physics

... After going through long-used literature search, it has been found in the present study that the very manner in which two relevant physical quantities are specified along the two axes of coordinates for drawing a graph is totally ambiguous. This is because each of those procedures of specification of two physical quantities along the two axes of coordinates in graph drawing primarily ignores the inherent nature of a "Physical quantity", which has got a numerical value along with a corresponding unit, or more precisely, as per Quantity calculus [4,5], ...

Quantity Calculus, Fundamental Constants, and SI Units
  • Citing Article
  • June 2018

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

... Since 1885, the fixed number of entities in one mole has been measured (with uncertainty) through various experiments, materials, and methods in which the mole is quantified by mass, Becker (2001), Mohr et al (2018), Newell et al (2018). The mass of one atom of carbon-12 is fixed. ...

Data and analysis for the CODATA 2017 Special Fundamental Constants Adjustment

... In their study, Pohl et al. employed laser spectroscopy to measure the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen with unprecedented precision, yielding a proton charge radius of r p = 0.84184(67) fm. This value, which is 10 times more precise than earlier measurements, deviates by 5σ from the CODATA value of r p = 0.8768(69) fm [29]. The experiment leveraged the smaller Bohr radius in muonic hydrogen to enhance sensitivity to the proton's finite-size effects, challenging the consistency of quantum electrodynamics (QED) calculations and suggesting potential refinements to the Rydberg constant or theoretical models. ...

CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2014*
  • Citing Article
  • December 2016

... Three [23]; value derived from measurements of the 1s -2s and 2s -4p intervals in eH [34]; value derived from measurements of the 1s -2s interval and of the 2p -2s Lamb shift in eH [33]; value derived from measurements of the 1s -2s and 1s -3s intervals in eH [30]; value derived from measurements in muonic hydrogen [15]. From top to bottom in (b): Value recommended by CODATA (2014 adjustment) [45]; values recommended by CODATA (2018 adjustment) [23]; result derived from the isotope shift of the 1s -2s interval in the electronic species [12]; value derived from measurements in muonic hydrogen and muonic deuterium [15]. From top to bottom in (c): values derived from the isotope shift of the 2 3 S -2 3 P interval in the electronic species as measured by Shiner et al [38,40] (left) or as measured by Cancio Pastor et al [38,41,42] (right); value derived from the isotope shift of the 2 3 S -2 1 S interval in the electronic species [16,17]; value derived from measurements in muonic 3 He and muonic 4 He [13,18] as redetermined in [19]. ...

CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2014
  • Citing Article
  • September 2016

Review of Modern Physics

... The SI in use at present [2] could also have been formulated in terms of the six defining constants and one defining quantity that had been the most-recently specified by the CGPM, either explicitly or implicitly, prior to November 2018 (see Ref. [10]): The newton (symbol N) is expressed in terms of base units as N = kg m s −2 [2]. Expressions for the hertz, lumen, and watt in terms of base units are found in Section 1. ...

The Current SI Seen From the Perspective of the Proposed New SI

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology

... Max Planck found this formula by assuming G, c, and  were the most important universal constants, and then applied dimensional analysis to derive this formula as well as formulas for the Planck time, Planck mass, and Planck temperature. We can solve the Planck length formula for G and get In 1987, Cohen [6] pointed out correctly that this would only lead to a circular problem as long as no one at that time knew how to find the Planck mass or Planck length independently of first knowing G. ...

The Fundamental Physical Constants
  • Citing Article
  • August 1999

Physics Today

... our model is associated with 3 atomic gravitational constants and one celestial gravitational constant, we call our model as 4G model of Final Unification. Important results pertaining to nuclear physics are [15,16,17,18], 1) All the nucleons are not involved in the nuclear binding energy scheme. ...

CODATA recommended values of the fundamental constants
  • Citing Article
  • November 2000

... Spectroscopic methods have proved to be very useful for studying the properties of molecules. The principle exploratory work in it may now be completed, but the theory is still interesting because of its applications, because of the way it illustrates many principles of quantum mechanics and group theory, and the way theory is used to solve more complex problems, spectroscopy means the energy-level structure charting of the physical systems that measured experimentally [2][3][4][5]. ...

Adjusting the Values of the Fundamental Constants
  • Citing Article
  • March 2001

Physics Today