Barbara Priwitzer’s research while affiliated with Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus - Senftenberg and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (3)


Figure 1: Neuron distribution of dataset #3 (see Table 1) on the MEA for three points in time (a 7 days in vitro (DIV), b 12 DIV, and c 19 DIV). It is clearly visible that the number of neuronal connections increases and the neurons move over time. The black dots indicate the MEA electrodes. The scale is 100 μm
Figure 2: Comparison of spike trains and ISI histogram of both the experimental and simulated data. a The upper row shows snippets of example spike trains of the measured hESC-NNs at five electrodes of dataset #9 (electrode number on the y axis). The middle row shows the raw voltage traces of channel 63. The lower row represents the resulting spike trains of five simulated neurons. Each row shows measurement time point 1, 3 and 5, respectively. The length of the detected bursts is indicated as bars on top of the spikes. b The upper row shows the ISI histogram of one channel/ neuron. On the left, an ISI histogram of channel 63 at measurement time point 5 (22 DIV). On the right, an ISI histogram of a simulated neuron at vMTP 5. The lower row shows the population ISI histogram of dataset #9 at MTP 5 on the left and the population ISI histogram of the neuronal network at vMTP 5. Note that we compare the ISIs of 20 active MEA electrodes where the exact number of recorded neurons is unknown with ISIs of 1000 simulated neurons. Thus, the absolute number of spikes cannot be compared and the main information is in the distribution of the histogram
Figure 3: Development of the neuronal activity over time (measurement time point 1–6). Clockwise: medians and quartiles of the spike rate, the burst rate, the average number of spikes per burst and the burst duration of all wells in the medium activity class, respectively. Note that some outliers are not shown in the last two graphs for visibility reasons. The values of each box plot are represented in Table 3
Figure 4: Proportion of GABAergic cells in neuronal population analyzed at different measurement time points (MTP). Standard deviations for calculated GABA-positive cell percentages in measurement time points 2, 3, 4, and 32 days in vitro (DIV) are 17, 9, 13 and 10 %, respectively. b Representative image of GABA-positive cells. c Representative image of neuronal network double-labeled with GABA. d Cells expressing calcium binding protein Calretinin form a subpopulation of GABAergic cells. e Expression of GABA and GABA synthesizing enzyme glutamate decarboxylase labeled with GAD67 define GABAergic neurons. Nuclei (blue) are stained with DAPI. The used magnification for b and c is ×10 and for d and e ×20
Simulation of developing human neuronal cell networks
  • Article
  • Full-text available

August 2016

·

235 Reads

·

9 Citations

BioMedical Engineering OnLine

Kerstin Lenk

·

Barbara Priwitzer

·

·

[...]

·

Background Microelectrode array (MEA) is a widely used technique to study for example the functional properties of neuronal networks derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESC-NN). With hESC-NN, we can investigate the earliest developmental stages of neuronal network formation in the human brain. Methods In this paper, we propose an in silico model of maturating hESC-NNs based on a phenomenological model called INEX. We focus on simulations of the development of bursts in hESC-NNs, which are the main feature of neuronal activation patterns. The model was developed with data from developing hESC-NN recordings on MEAs which showed increase in the neuronal activity during the investigated six measurement time points in the experimental and simulated data. ResultsOur simulations suggest that the maturation process of hESC-NN, resulting in the formation of bursts, can be explained by the development of synapses. Moreover, spike and burst rate both decreased at the last measurement time point suggesting a pruning of synapses as the weak ones are removed. Conclusions To conclude, our model reflects the assumption that the interaction between excitatory and inhibitory neurons during the maturation of a neuronal network and the spontaneous emergence of bursts are due to increased connectivity caused by the forming of new synapses.

Download

Figure 1 In each row, bursting spike trains of the first ten simulated neurons are displayed. Each dash marks a spike. The time scale (below) is in seconds. 
INEX – A binary neuronal model with inhibitory and excitatory synapses

BMC Neuroscience

Our aim is to develop a simple model which is suitable to simulate concentration-response curves as observed in in-vitro experiments with multielectrode array (MEA) neurochips. In an in-vitro experiment approximately 10.000 neurons of the frontal cortex of embryonic mice [1] are cultivated on a MEA neurochip [2]. Neuro-active substances like bicuculline are added to the network. Based on the recorded data, various features [3] are calculated adapted from spikes and bursts. The features are separately displayed in concentration-response curves [4] which show the logarithm of the substance concentration and the chosen feature. The developed INEX (inhibitory-excitatory) model is a cellular automaton whose cells are neurons with two possible states: ON or OFF. Each neuron obtains several inputs and produces exactly one output (respectively 0 or 1). Furthermore, it is phenomenological model where the neurons are described as black boxes. The probability if a spike occurs in time slice was calculated using a Poisson process [5]. Neurons are connected by either inhibitory or excitatory synapses with varying strength. The corresponding parameters are called weights. The network is fully connected and has direct feedbacks. Additionally, a spike time history was added. The aim was to vary the parameters of the model in such a way that we obtain a sigmoid concentration-response curve to simulate excitatory and inhibitory effects in neuronal networks. A network with 100 neurons ran over 10 seconds with varying weights and Δt = 1 ms. Ninety inhibitory synapses with weights between -0.2 and 0 and ten excitatory synapses with weights between 0 and 0.7 are used. We detected spikes and bursts (figure (figure1)1) as known from experiments with MEA neurochips. Thereafter, the same network ran over 18 minutes. The excitatory weights are reduced in six steps respectively by 0.05 every 3 minutes. The mean spike rate for each step is calculated and displayed in a concentration-response curve [6]. Figure 1 In each row, bursting spike trains of the first ten simulated neurons are displayed. Each dash marks a spike. The time scale (below) is in seconds. The INEX model shows potential to simulate inhibitory and excitatory effects which are also observed in experiments with MEA neurochips. A sigmoid concentration-response curve can be obtained by the simulation. We will work on parallelisation of processes to decrease the run time of the algorithm.


Citations (1)


... Despite these limitations, we demonstrate that SBI offers several advantages over traditional parameter estimation methods. While trial-and-error methods are common in neuronal modeling studies, they lack systematicity and often yield singular solutions [10,29,30]. Similarly, parametersearching methods, such as grid searches or evolutionary algorithms, require defining distance measures to experimental observations, necessitate numerous simulations for every experimental observation, and provide only one optimal parameter set without quantifying uncertainty or parameter importance [12,13]. ...

Reference:

Automated inference of disease mechanisms in patient-hiPSC-derived neuronal networks
Simulation of developing human neuronal cell networks

BioMedical Engineering OnLine