BRUNO S. PRIESTLEY's scientific contributions
What is this page?
This page lists the scientific contributions of an author, who either does not have a ResearchGate profile, or has not yet added these contributions to their profile.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
It was automatically created by ResearchGate to create a record of this author's body of work. We create such pages to advance our goal of creating and maintaining the most comprehensive scientific repository possible. In doing so, we process publicly available (personal) data relating to the author as a member of the scientific community.
If you're a ResearchGate member, you can follow this page to keep up with this author's work.
If you are this author, and you don't want us to display this page anymore, please let us know.
Publication (1)
ALTHOUGH it may seem a far-fetched endeavor to use the ponderous tool of genetics in the interpretation of everyday problems in strabismus, the hereditary approach, nevertheless, yields many clues in the etiology and management of strabismus. The aim of the present study was to analyze the multiple factors in the pathogenesis and etiology of strabi...
Citations
... The global distribution of the 141 studies and their cohort sizes is shown in Figure 2, panel B. After adjustment of the female numbers to take into account the unequal sex ratio in the general population, there were 78 442 males and 85 732 females [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][11][12][13][18][19][20][21][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136]138,139,. Among the clinic-based studies, 40 studies detailed gender information for esotropia (4983 males and 5526 females, adjusted for the sex ratio) [4,12,13,20,99,101,119,122,132,133,136,139,143,144,146,150,154,160,163,164,167,174,176,180,187,198,200,209,211,213,[219][220][221]229], and 51 studies detailed gender information for exotropia (4056 males and 5122 females, adjusted for the sex ratio) [1,4,6,8,9,12,13,[19][20][21]99,[104][105][106][107]111,112,115,117,119,122,128,132,133,136,139,143,144,150,154,160,[162][163][164]174,176,180,184,194,198,200,201,209,211,213,[217][218][219][220][221]229]. [28]. ...
