Aura Piha’s research while affiliated with University of Helsinki and other places

What is this page?


This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.

Publications (1)


Examples of burned plots 8 years after fire: (a) a younger stand (Y1) with low tree mortality and poor regeneration of trees or ground vegetation; (b) a younger stand (Y3) with high mortality, canopy opening, and regeneration; and (c) an older stand (O7) with low mortality and poor regeneration
The percentage of scarred trees out of remaining living trees in the study plots 8 years after fire. Y, the younger stands (30–35 years at time of burning); O, the older age group (45 years at time of burning)
Main characteristics of fire scars: (a) length distribution of fire scars, (b) width distribution of fire scars, and (c) distribution of height from ground (measured as height from ground to the lowest point in the scar), the latter two divided into two scar length classses (>2 m and <2 m)
Examples of fire scars in the study plots: (a) fire scar with clearly thickened edges and resin, formed underneath a branch (blackened branch stub); (b) scar of an irregular shape near the base of the tree, there is some resin, but the edges are not thickened; (c) typical small scar, 2 cm × 2 cm, with some resin on the sides and a branch stub on the right, edges are not thickened; (d) three separate scars reaching up to 2.5 m, some scars end underneath a branch, some new growth can be seen at the base of the tree, on the left side (light-coloured thickened edge), there is little resin; (e) scar with resin on the sides and a thickened edge on the top left, there is a branch knot on both sides; (f) small fire scar with a clear rope-like thickened edge on the right, clumps of resin can be seen and a branch stub on the left; (g) long scar with some resin but no sign of new growth (no thickened edges), the scar ends underneath a branch; (h) scar formed at a height of 2 m, the bark is showing signs of initiating new growth and there is resin along the edges. Many fire scars seemed to form adjacent to the knots of the lower dried out branches. This was not recorded in a systematic manner during field measurements but was analysed later from photographs taken of each fire scar. Of all scars, 49% were adjacent to branch knots. The scars were most often underneath the branch knot, sometimes on the sides, but never on top. There seemed to be two types of scars adjacent to branches: small, round scars where the scar seemed to have formed because of the branch, perhaps due to flames lingering there (seen in Fig. 4a), or scars that formed some distance underneath or to the side of the knot, and the knot stopped the advancement of the scar (seen in Figs. 4d and 4g)
Stand characteristics of the experimental plots (adapted from K. Sidoroff, unpublished data)

+3

Can scar-based fire history reconstructions be biased? An experimental study in boreal Scots pine
  • Article
  • Full-text available

April 2013

·

1,463 Reads

·

14 Citations

Aura Piha

·

·

Henrik Lindberg

·

Determining forest fire history is commonly based on fire scar dating with dendrochronological methods. We used an experimental setup to investigate the impacts of low-intensity prescribed fire on fire scar formation 8 years after fire in 12 young managed Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands. Five stands were between 30 and 35 years old and seven were 45 years old at the time of burning. A total of 217 fire scars were recorded in 142 trees. The number of separate scars per tree originating from a single fire ranged from 1 to 6, with 67% of the trees having just one scar. The proportion of fire-scarred trees out of all trees per plot ranged from 0% to 30%, averaging 16.5% in young stands and 2.8% in older stands. Four of the 12 burned plots did not have any trees with fire scars, and these were all in the older age group. This means that in the older stands, in only three of seven plots (43%) did the fire leave scars from which fire can potentially be detected and dated afterwards. Our results suggest that fire scar dating in Scots pine dominated forests may underestimate fire frequency, area, and the importance of historically common low-intensity surface fires in dendrochronological reconstructions of past fire histories.

Download

Citations (1)


... This suggests that fuel amounts in the study area do not limit fire occurrence, like in hemiboreal and boreal Scots pine forests, where the period of 5-10 years seems to be a minimum time span of the post-fire fuel succession which allows for the consecutive fire spread (Lehtonen et al., 1996;Niklasson and Drakenberg, 2001). Because scarring at such short intervals is weak (Dieterich and Swetnam, 1984;Swetnam and Baisan, 1996;Falk et al., 2011, and literature therein) not all trees might be scarred during such fires [see also Piha et al. (2013)]. ...

Reference:

First Spatial Reconstruction of Past Fires in Temperate Europe Suggests Large Variability of Fire Sizes and an Important Role of Human-Related Ignitions
Can scar-based fire history reconstructions be biased? An experimental study in boreal Scots pine