September 2024
·
7 Reads
Political Research Exchange
What is this page?
This page lists works of an author who doesn't have a ResearchGate profile or hasn't added the works to their profile yet. It is automatically generated from public (personal) data to further our legitimate goal of comprehensive and accurate scientific recordkeeping. If you are this author and want this page removed, please let us know.
Publications (3)
June 2021
·
417 Reads
·
3 Citations
Információs Társadalom
This article adopts a political theoretical perspective to address the problem of AI regulation. By disregarding the political problem of enforceability, it is argued that the applied ethics approach dominant in the discussions on AI regulation is incomplete. Applying realist political theory, the article demonstrates how prescriptive accounts of the development, use, and functioning of AI are necessarily political. First, the political nature of the problem is investigated by focusing on the use of AI in politics on the one hand and the political nature of the AI regulation problem on the other. Second, the article claims that by revisiting some of the oldest political and theoretical questions, the discourse on guidelines and regulation can be enriched through the adoption of AGI and superintelligence as tools for political theoretical inquiry.
January 2021
·
27 Reads
·
2 Citations
This article adopts a political theoretical perspective to address the problem of AI regulation. By disregarding the political problem of enforceability, it is argued that the applied ethics approach dominant in the discussions on AI regulation is incomplete. Applying realist political theory, the article demonstrates how prescriptive accounts of the development, use, and functioning of AI are necessarily political. First, the political nature of the problem is investigated by focusing on the use of AI in politics on the one hand and the political nature of the AI regulation problem on the other. Second, the article claims that by revisiting some of the oldest political and theoretical questions, the discourse on guidelines and regulation can be enriched through the adoption of AGI and superintelligence as tools for political theoretical inquiry.
Citations (2)
... However, a key limitation of these works is the absence of accounting for political struggles over the exact meaning of normative precepts for regulation (what constitutes "fairness" or "transparency" in whose perspective and whose vision of these norms comes to dominate regulation?; see discussion in chapters in section II of this Handbook) both on paper and in practice. Critics of applied ethics approaches to AIT regulation argue that the constant attempt to develop more fine-grained legal and technical fixes for problems such as bias or lack of explainability rules fails to recognize the deeply political nature of rules which can never be specific enough to be unambiguous or self-enforce (Gyulai and Ujlaki 2021). The close examination of struggles over norm interpretation and practice is therefore vital. ...
- Citing Article
January 2021
... The subjection of AI to regulations is becoming global, because the ethical concerns it poses are in the public global space. Gyulai and Ujlaki (2021) The prescriptive accounts of AI development, use, and functioning are essentially political, with the political problem of unenforceability being at the apex. Zuiderwijk et al. (2021) Concrete, multidisciplinary and theoretical foundations for AI use can solve the issues associated with using AI for politics and public governance. ...
- Citing Article
- Full-text available
June 2021
Információs Társadalom